Scientific Research and Essays
Subscribe to SRE
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - 784562965379


Vol.12(12), pp. 113-119 , June 2017
DOI: 10.5897/SRE2017.6509
ISSN: 1992-2248



Full Length Research Paper

Optimizing the life cycle of an office building at semiarid region



Pooya Pakmehr
  • Pooya Pakmehr
  • Department of Engineering and Technology, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, 34437, Turkey.
  • Google Scholar
Mustafa Erkan Karaguler
  • Mustafa Erkan Karaguler
  • Department of Architecture, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, 34437, Turkey.
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 19 April 2017  Accepted: 29 June 2017  Published: 30 June 2017

Copyright © 2017 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


Energy consumption by occupants during utilization phase concerns the increase of global warming potential and a shortage of energy resources. Energy consumption in an effective way decreases the risk of global warming. Use of materials with high embodied energy and embodied carbon in building components may improve the energy performance of the building, but it can ameliorate global warming. The issue of Life Cycle is quite new in the Middle East, so is it effective or does it work in developing countries. One of the goals of this study is to use three different wall types in a two-story office with close embodied energy and U-value (overall heat transfer coefficient) and compare the performance of each wall in the building from the Life Cycle point of view. Subsequently, analyzing the importance of other factors such as embodied carbon and transportation in choosing appropriate material in the construction sector. According to this study, even in countries like Iran (‘‘which holds the world's fourth-largest proved crude oil reserves and the world's second-largest natural gas reserves’’) with very low amount of database about the embodied energy, the right material should be chosen to reduce the fuel consumption and CO2 emission.

 

Key words: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), office, embodied energy.

Adalberth K (1997). Energy Use during the Life Cycle of Buildings: A Method. Build. Environ. 32(4):317-320.
Crossref

 

Ascione F, Bianco N, Francesca De Masi R, de'Rossi F, Peter VG (2014). Energy Refurbishment of Existing Buildings Through The Use of Phase Change Materials. Energy Savings and Indoor Comfort in the Cooling Season. Appl. Ener. 113:990-1007.
Crossref

 
 

Azari R (2014). Integrated energy and environmental life cycle assessment of office building envelopes. Ener. Build. 82:156-162.
Crossref

 
 

Azzouz A, Borchersb M, Moreirab J, Mavrogiannia A (2017). Life cycle assessment of energy conservation measures during early stage office building design: A case study in London, UK. Ener. Build. 139:547-568.
Crossref

 
 

Bribian IZ, Capilla AV, Uson AA (2011). Life Cycle Assessment of Building Materials: Comparative Analysis of Energy and Environmental Impacts and Evaluation of the Eco-Efficiency Improvement Potential. The University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.

 
 

Cabeza LF, Barreneche C, Miro L, Morera J, Bartoli E, Fernandez IA (2013). Low Carbon And Low Embodied Energy Materials In Buildings: A review. Renewable Sustain. Ener. Rev. 23:536-542.
Crossref

 
 

Geng S, Wang Y, Zuo J, Zhou Z, Du H, Mao G (2017). Building life cycle assessment research: A review by bibliometric analysis. Renewable and Sustain. Ener. Rev. 76:176-184.
Crossref

 
 

Ghose A, McLarena S, Dowdellb D, Phipps R (2017). Environmental assessment of deep energy refurbishment for energy efficiency-case study of an office building in New Zealand. Build. Environ. 117:274-287.
Crossref

 
 

Hammond G, Jones C (2008). Inventory of Carbon and Energy (ICE). Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, UK.

 
 

Jayamaha L (2007). Energy Efficient Building Systems: Green Strategies for Operation and Maintenance. McGraw-Hill, New York.

 
 

Luo Z, Yang L, Liu J (2016) Embodied carbon emissions of office building: A case study of China's 78 office buildings. Build. Environ. 95:365-371.
Crossref

 
 

Ma J, Dua G, Zhanga Z, Wang P, Xiea B (2017). Life cycle analysis of energy consumption and CO2 emissions from a typical large office building in Tianjin, China. Build. Environ. 117:36-48.
Crossref

 
 

Menzies GF (2011). Life Cycle Energy and Environmental Analysis of Partition Wall Systems in the UK. International Conference on Green Buildings and Sustainable Cities.Procedia Engineering. pp. 864-873.

 
 

Ooteghem P, Xu L (2012). The life-cycle assessment of a single-storey retail building in Canada. Build. Environ. 49:212-226.
Crossref

 
 

Pfundstein M, Gellert R, Spitzner M, Rudolphi A (2008). Insulating Materials, Principles Materials Applications. Aumuller Druck, Regensburg. pp. 9-99.
Crossref

 
 

Ramesh T, Prakash R, Shukla KK (2012). Life Cycle Energy Analysis of a Residential Building with Different Envelopes and Climates in Indian Context. Appl. Energy 89:193-202.
Crossref

 
 

Reddy BV, Jagadish KS (2003). Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies. pp. 129-137.

 
 

Sartori I, Hestnes AG (2007). Energy Use in the Life Cycle of Conventional and Low Energy Buildings: A Review Article. Energy Build. 39:249-257.
Crossref

 
 

Suzuki M, Oka T (1998). Estimation of Life Cycle Energy Consumption and CO2 Emission of Office Buildings in Japan. Ener. Build. 28:33-41.
Crossref

 
 

Thiel Cl, Campion N, Lanndis AE, Jones AK, Schaefer LA (2013). A Materials Life Cycle Assessment of a Net-Zero Energy Building. Energies 6:1125-1141.
Crossref

 
 

Turkish Standard Regulation on the Energy Performance of Buildings (2008). No: 27075 and 26847.

 

 


APA Pakmehr, P., & Karaguler, M. E. (2017). Optimizing the life cycle of an office building at semiarid region. Scientific Research and Essays, 12(12), 113-119.
Chicago Pooya Pakmehr and Mustafa Erkan Karaguler. "Optimizing the life cycle of an office building at semiarid region." Scientific Research and Essays 12, no. 12 (2017): 113-119.
MLA Pooya Pakmehr and Mustafa Erkan Karaguler. "Optimizing the life cycle of an office building at semiarid region." Scientific Research and Essays 12.12 (2017): 113-119.
   
DOI 10.5897/SRE2017.6509
URL http://www.academicjournals.org/journal/SRE/article-abstract/784562965379

Subscription Form