Journal of Physical Education and Sport Management
Subscribe to JPESM
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - 8C7DAB048324


Vol.5(5), pp. 59-65 , October 2014
DOI: 10.5897/JPESM2014.0199
ISSN: 1996-0794



Full Length Research Paper

The 9 credit rule: A look at its impact on academic advising for intercollegiate football athletes



Joshua Castle
  • Joshua Castle
  • Indiana University of Pennsylvania, United States.
  • Google Scholar
Robin Ammon
  • Robin Ammon
  • University of South Dakota, United States.
  • Google Scholar
Les Myers
  • Les Myers
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States.
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 26 August 2014  Accepted: 17 October 2014  Published: 31 October 2014

Copyright © 2014 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine the impact the NCAA’s 2011 9 Credit Rule would have on football academic advising strategies. The legislation requires players to earn nine credit hours in every fall term or be suspended for the first four games the following season. For this study, a survey was distributed to Football Academic Advisors at NCAA Division I institutions. Subjects were asked if the 9 Credit Rule has changed their advising strategies regarding: at-risk students, incoming freshmen, clustering and the use of elective credits. The subjects were also able to provide open ended responses regarding strategies they plan to implement to help students from becoming ineligible. According to the data, due to the 9 Credit Rule, 69.4% of responding advisors planned to change their advising strategies for all student athletes. Additional results specified that 83.1% of the respondents were more likely to change their advising strategy when dealing with at-risk student athletes. Additionally, 73.1% of the responding advisors indicated they were more likely to change their advising strategy for incoming freshmen. Over 58% of the responding academic advisors stated they were more likely to use elective credits earlier in a student-athletes’ career and 60.6% would be more likely to cluster student athletes into specific majors. The responses indicated that, on average, 6.1student athletes/program would have been affected by the rule if the legislation had been enacted in 2010. One respondent went so far as to surmise that 30% of their student athletes would be ineligible for the first four games of the following year. The NCAA’s 9 Credit Rule has the potential to impact numerous athletic departments across the United States. Knowledge and awareness of the implemented legislation is the first step for football academic advisors in the monitoring of their student-athletes. Additional studies will be necessary to determine if the legislation has caused major changes in academic advising for football players including an increase in the clustering of student-athletes in specific academic majors.

Key words: Extracurricular activities, human resource management, mixed methods approach, physical education, volunteer.

Brady E (2008). Athletes' academic choices put advisors in tough balancing act. USA Today. 

View

 

Busch A (2007). Seeking a life after college football. Sports Illustrated.

View

 

Capriccioso R (2006). Tackling favoritism for athletes. Inside Higher Ed.

View

 

Carodine K, Almond K, Grotto K (2001). College student athlete success both in and out of the classroom. New Directions for Student Services, 93:19-33.

 

Case B, Greer HS, Brown J (1987). Academic clustering in athletics: Myth or reality? Arena Rev. 11: 48-56.

 

Castle J (2010). The impact of the academic progress rating on the retention and recruiting strategies of NCAA Division I football programs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.

 

Christy K, Seifried C, Pastore D (2008). Intercollegiate athletics: A preliminary study examining the opinions on the impact of the academic performance rate (APR). J. Issues Intercollegiate Athletics. 1:1-10.

 

Fountain JJ, Finley PS (2009). Academic majors of upperclassmen football players in the Atlantic Coast Conference: An analysis of academic clustering comparing white and minority players. J. Issues Intercollegiate Athletics 2:1-13.

 

Fountain JJ, Finley PS (2011). Academic Clustering: A longitudinal analysis of a Division I football program. J. Issues Intercollegiate Athletics 4: 24-41.

 

Ganim S (2014). UNC fake class scandal and NCAA's response wind their way to Washington. CNN.

View

 

Grasgreen A (2012). More credits, more clusters. Inside Higher Ed.

View

 

Hosick M (2008). Reform's in roads evident with APR release. The NCAA News.

View

 

Hosick M (2011). New rule should boost APR in football. The NCAA News. Retrieved from http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/public/NCAA/Resources/Latest+News/2011/May/New+rule+should+boost+APRs+in+football

 

Kulics J (2006). An analysis of the academic behaviors and beliefs of Division I student-athletes and academic administrators: The impact of the increased percentage toward degree requirements (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from proquest.com

 

Lederman D (2003). Major issue: Athletes' studies. USA Today.

View

 

Patti R (1974). Organizational resistance and change: The view from the bottom. Soc. Serv. Rev. 48(3), 367-383.
Crossref

 

Sax L, Gilmartin S, Bryant A (2003). Assessing response rate and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Res. Higher Educ. 44(4):409-432.

 

Schneider R, Ross S, Fisher M (2010). Academic clustering and major selection of intercollegiate student-athletes. College Student J. 44(1):64-70.

 

Sherman M (2012). New eligibility standards on the way. ESPN.com.

View

 

Slack T, Parent M (2006). Understanding sports organizations. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

 

Staff. (2011). Top 5 'pay to play' scandals rocking college football. The Week.

View

 

Steeg J (2008). UNLV athletes question degrees in university studies. USA Today.

View

 

Steeg J, Upton J, Bohn P, Berkowitz S (2008). College athlete's studies guided toward 'major in eligibility'. USA Today.

View

 

Suggs W (2003). Jock majors. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

View

 

Suter W (1998). Primer Educ. Res. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

 

Wolverton B (2010). NCAA agrees to $10.8-billion deal to broadcast its men's basketball tournament. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

View

 


APA Castle, J., Ammon, R., & Myers, L. (2014). The 9 credit rule: A look at its impact on academic advising for intercollegiate football athletes. Journal of Physical Education and Sport Management, 5(5), 59-65.
Chicago Joshua Castle, Robin Ammon and Les Myers. "The 9 credit rule: A look at its impact on academic advising for intercollegiate football athletes." Journal of Physical Education and Sport Management 5, no. 5 (2014): 59-65.
MLA Joshua Castle, Robin Ammon and Les Myers. "The 9 credit rule: A look at its impact on academic advising for intercollegiate football athletes." Journal of Physical Education and Sport Management 5.5 (2014): 59-65.
   
DOI 10.5897/JPESM2014.0199
URL http://www.academicjournals.org/journal/JPESM/article-abstract/8C7DAB048324

Subscription Form