Journal of Fine and Studio Art
Subscribe to JFSA
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - 502FA2F55648

Vol.5(2), pp. 6-17 , October 2015
ISSN: 2141-6524

 Total Views: 0
 Downloaded: 0

Full Length Research Paper

Bharatanatyam and Mathematics: Teaching Geometry Through Dance

Iyengar Mukunda Kalpana
  • Iyengar Mukunda Kalpana
  • San Antonio Writing Project (Department of Interdisciplinary Learning and Teaching) University of Texas at San Antonio, United States.
  • Google Scholar

 Received: 18 August 2015  Accepted: 18 September 2015  Published: 31 October 2015

Copyright © 2015 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

Bharatanatyam is a highly codified and schematized Asian Indian style of classical dance that accommodates the different kinds of learners. This dance is culturally relevant to Asian Indian American students, but the findings are applicable to students from other demographics that are interested in learning math through dance. Many Asian Indian students learn Bharatanatyam for cultural maintenance and preservation. Dance is also a beneficial medium to teach basic geometric shapes to young children because dance is an engaging art curriculum that can be used in schools.  This mixed methods study informed by categorical content analysis is designed to recommend a framework for exploring how Asian Indian students can learn basic geometric shapes through Bharatanatyam. The study investigates dance movements called adavus, cultural relevance, and integration of elements from dance and geometry and the implementation of alternate strategies such as dance instruction to teach and learn basic geometric shapes. The data analysis revealed the benefits of dance and math integration.


Key words: Asian Indian students, Bharatanatyam, geometry, learning styles, teaching and learning.

Banerjee S (2013). Adaptation of Bharatanatyam dance pedagogy for multicultural classrooms: Questions and relevance in North American university setting. Research in Dance Education 14(1):28-38.


Barthes R (1987). Mythologies. New York, NY: Hill & Wang.


Bracilovic A (2009). Essential dance medicine. New York, NY: Humana Press.


Brillon R (2014). Choreography math: Teaching geometric concepts through dance movement and design. Ph.D. diss., ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing. (accessed on August 10, 2015).


Cook SW, Yip T, Meadow S (2013). Gestures, but not meaningless movements, lighten working memory load when explaining math. Lang. Cognit. Processes 27(4):594-610.


Chodorow J (2013). Dance therapy and depth psychology: The moving imagination. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis. (accessed June 5, 2015).


Cornell C (1999). I hate math! I couldn't learn it, and I can't teach it. Childhood Education 75(4):68-72., (accessed June 10, 2015).


Dale E (1946). Audio-visual methods in teaching. New York, NY: Dryden Press.


Dale E (1996). The cone of experience. In Classic writings on instructional technology, ed. D. P. Ely and T. Plomp, 169-180. Englewood, CA. Erlbaum.


Devichi C, Munier V (2013). About the concept of angle in elementary school: misconceptions and teaching sequences. J Math. Behav., 32(1):1-19 (accessed August 10, 2015).


Dunn R, Dunn K (2012). Thirty-five years of research on perceptual strengths: Essential strategies to promote learning. Clearing House: J. Educ. Strat. 78(6):273-276.


Duru A (2010). The experimental teaching in some of topics geometry. Educ. Res. Rev. 5(10):584-592.


Dietiker LC, Brakoniecki A (2014). Reading geometrically: The negotiation of the expected meaning of diagrams in geometry textbooks. Paper presented at the International Conference on Mathematics Textbook Research and Development, San Francisco, CA.


Gardner H (1988). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books, Inc (accessed August 10, 2015).


Gardner H (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic Books.


Galeet W (2012). Dance, mathematics, and rote memorization. J. Phys. Educ. Recreation Dance 73(6):12-15.


Hansen HG (2005). Looking in the lozanov mirror. Paper presented at the Shapes of Education Convention, Sofia, Bulgaria.


Jensen E (2000). Moving with the brain in mind. Educational Leadership 58(3):34-37.


Jiesamfoek H (2012). Dance and play. In Young children and the arts: Nurturing imagination and creativity, ed. C. Korn-Bursztyn, 195-207. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Pub.


Klingenberg OG (2012). Conceptual understanding of shape and space by Norwegi-reading: Norwegian students in elementary school. J. Vis. Impair. Blin. 106(8):453-465


Lazonov G (1981). Suggestology and outlines of suggestopedy. Mahwah, NJ: Gordon & Breach.


Leiblich A, Tuval-Mashiach R, Zilber T (1998). Narrative analysis: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.


Magee AP, Leeth JH (2014). Using transmediation in elementary preservice teacher education: A literacy and science collaborative. J Adol. Adult Lit. 58(4):327-336. df, (accessed on June 5, 2015).


Meekums B (2015). Dance movement therapy for depression. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2(1):9CD009895., (accessed June 5, 2015).


Mertens DM (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.


Magee AP, Leeth JH (2014). Using transmediation in elementary preservice teacher education: A literacy and science collaborative. J Adol. Adult Lit. 58(4): 327-336. Retrieved from: (accessed August 10, 2015).


McCarthy-Brown N (2014). Decolonizing dance curriculum in higher education: One credit at a time. J Dance Educ. 14(4):125-129. Retrieved from:, (accessed on July, 20, 2015).


Moore C, Linder S (2012). Using dance to deepen students understanding of geometry. J Dance Educ. 12(3):104-108., (accessed on 6 June, 2015).


Noweck RS (2011). Agents of integration: Understanding transfer as a rhetorical act. National Council of Teachers of English Publication. Chicago, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.


Prichard A, Taylor J (1981). A demonstration of the concept of "hyperlearning." J Lear. Disabilities 14(1):19-47.


Poursabahian JP (2012). Teaching an ancient performing art in a modern context. J Physical Educ., Recreation, and Dance 83(1): 24-26.


Ramanath BS (2009). Body uncovered. Lecture Demonstration at the Multicultural Conference on Body Uncovered, San Antonio, TX.


Rosenfeld M (2013). Making math and making dance: A closer look at integration. Teach. Artist J 11(4):205-214., (accessed April 10, 2015).


Samson L (2010). Rukmini devi: A life. Delhi, India: Penguin Books.


Sangeetha S, Ragothaman Y (2014). Bhartanatyam and the worldwideweb: What's happening in the world of bhartanatyam? (accessed March15, 2015).


Siegel M (1995). More than Words: The Generative Power of transmediation for learning. Canadian J. Educ. / Revue canadienne de l'éducation 20(4):455-475.


SHINE FOR GIRLS. N.d. In Shine., (accessed March 20, 2015).


Sipe LR (1998). How picture books work: A semiotically framed theory of text-picture relationships. Children's Literature in Education 29(2):97-108.


Steedman P (2000). On the relations between seeing, interpreting and knowing. In Steier, Research and reflexivity, ed. F. Steier, 53-62, London: Sage.


Tembrioti L, Tsangaridou N (2014). Cultural awareness. Res. Dance Educ. 15(1):4-22.


Tomlinson B (2011). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press., (accessed June 05, 2015).


Ultanir E (2012). An epistemological glance at the constructivist approach: Consructivist learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. Int. J. Instruction 5(2):195-212.


Vygotsky LS (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological Processes. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.


Westreich, G. (2002). Dance, mathematics, and rote memorization. J. Physi. Educ. Recreation Dance 73(6):12-12+. Retrieved from


Yang W, Weiping, D (2011). "Rote Memorization of Vocabulary and Vocabulary Development." English Lang. Teach. 4(4):61-64.


Young R, Collin A (2004). Introduction: constructivism and social constructionism in the career field. J. Vocat. Behav. 64(3):373-388.


Zakaria E, Solfitri T, Yosoff D, Abidin Z (2013). Effect of cooperative learning on secondary school students' mathematics achievement. Creative Educ. 4(2):98-100.


Zuckerbros N (2011). From reader's theater to math dances: Bright ideas to differentiation happen. ERIC 120(5):31-35., (accessed June 2, 2015).


APA Kalpana, I. M. (2015). Bharatanatyam and Mathematics: Teaching Geometry Through Dance. Journal of Fine and Studio Art, 5(2), 6-17.
Chicago Iyengar Mukunda Kalpana. "Bharatanatyam and Mathematics: Teaching Geometry Through Dance." Journal of Fine and Studio Art 5, no. 2 (2015): 6-17.
MLA Iyengar Mukunda Kalpana. "Bharatanatyam and Mathematics: Teaching Geometry Through Dance." Journal of Fine and Studio Art 5.2 (2015): 6-17.

Subscription Form