Journal of Ecology and The Natural Environment
Subscribe to JENE
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - 859932242855

Vol.6(2), pp. 56-64 , February 2014
DOI: 10.5897/JENE2013.0424
ISSN: 2006-9847
 Total Views: 689
 Downloaded: 566

Full Length Research Paper

Effect of passive acoustic sampling methodology on detecting bats after declines from white nose syndrome

Laci S. Coleman
  • Laci S. Coleman
  • Eco-Tech Consultants, Inc. 1220 Kennestone Circle Suite 100 Marietta, GA 30066.
  • Google Scholar
W. Mark Ford
  • W. Mark Ford
  • U.S. Geological Survey, Virginia Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, 106 Cheatham Hall Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA.
  • Google Scholar
Chris A. Dobony
  • Chris A. Dobony
  • Fort Drum Military Installation, Natural Resources Branch, 85 First Street West, IMNE-DRM-PWE, Fort Drum, New York 13602, USA.
  • Google Scholar
Eric R. Britzke
  • Eric R. Britzke
  • U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, Mississippi 39180, USA
  • Google Scholar

 Accepted: 09 December 2013  Published: 28 February 2014

Copyright © 2014 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

Concomitant with the emergence and spread of white-nose syndrome (WNS) and precipitous decline of many bat species in North America, natural resource managers need modified and/or new techniques for bat inventory and monitoring that provide robust occupancy estimates. We used Anabat acoustic detectors to determine the most efficient passive acoustic sampling design for optimizing detection probabilities of multiple bat species in a WNS-impacted environment in New York, USA. Our sampling protocol included: six acoustic stations deployed for the entire duration of monitoring as well as a 4 x 4 grid and five transects of 5-10 acoustic units that were deployed for 6-8 night sample durations surveyed during the summers of 2011-2012. We used Program PRESENCE to determine detection probability and site occupancy estimates. Overall, the grid produced the highest detection probabilities for most species because it contained the most detectors and intercepted the greatest spatial area. However, big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) and species not impacted by WNS were detected easily regardless of sampling array. Endangered Indiana (Myotis sodalis) and little brown (Myotis lucifugus) and tri-colored bats (Perimyotis subflavus) showed declines in detection probabilities over our study, potentially indicative of continued WNS-associated declines. Identification of species presence through efficient methodologies is vital for future conservation efforts as bat populations decline further due to WNS and other factors.   


Key words: White-nose syndrome, detection probability, Indiana bat, little brown bat.

Barclay RMR (1999). Bats are not birds: A cautionary note on using echolocation calls to identify bats: A comment. J. Mammal. 80:290-296.
Betts BJ (1998). Effects of interindividual variation in echolocation calls on identification of big brown and silver-haired bats. J. Wildl. Manage. 62:1003-1010.
Blehert DS, Hicks AC, Behr M, Meteyer CU, Berlowski-Zier BM, Buckles EL, Coleman JTH, Darling SR, Gargas A, Niver R, Okoniewski JC, Rudd RJ, Stone WB (2009). Bat white-nose syndrome: an emerging fungal pathogen? Science 323:227-227.
Britzke ER (2003). Use of ultrasonic detectors for acoustic identification and study of bat ecology in the eastern United States. Diss., Tenn. Tech. Univ., Cookeville, USA.
Britzke ER, Duchamp JE, Murray KL, Swihart RK, Robbins LW (2011). Acoustic identification of bats in the eastern United States: A comparison of parametric and nonparametric methods. J. Wildl. Manage. 75:660-667.
Britzke ER, Murray KL, Heywood JS, Robbins LW (2002). Acoustic Identification. In: A. Kurta, and J. Kennedy, editors. The Indiana bat: biology and management of an endangered species. Bat Cons. Int., Austin, Texas, USA. pp. 220-224.
Britzke ER, Slack BA, Armstrong MP, Loeb SC (2010). Effects of orientation and weatherproofing on the detection of bat echolocation calls. J. Fish Wildl. Manage. 1:136-141.
Brooks RT, Ford WM (2005). Bat activity in a forest landscape of central Massachusetts. Northeast. Nat. 12:447-462.
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002). Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York, USA.
Davis WH, Hitchcock HB (1965). Biology and migration of the bat, Myotis lucifugus, in New England. J. Mammal. 46:296-313.
Dobony CA, Hicks AC, Langwig KE, v. Linden RI, Okoniewski JC, Rainbolt RE (2011). Little brown myotis persist despite exposure to white-nose syndrome. J. Fish Wildl. Manage. 2: 190-195.
Duchamp JE, Yates M, Muzika RM, Swihart RK (2006). Estimating probabilities of detection for bat echolocation calls: an application of the double observer method. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 34:408-412.
DzaL Y, McGuire LP, Veselka N, Fenton MB (2011). Going, going, gone: the impact of white-nose syndrome on the summer activity of the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus). Biol. Lett. 7:392-394.
[ESA] Endangered Species Act of 1973, Pub. L. No. 93-205, 87 Stat. 884 (Dec. 28, 1973).
Fenton MB (1966). Myotis sodalis in caves near Watertown, New York. J. Mammal. 47:526.
Ford WM, Britzke ER, Dobony CA, Rodrigue JL, Johnson JB (2011). Patterns of acoustical activity of bats prior to and following white-nose syndrome occurrence. J. Fish Wildl. Manage. 2:125-134.
Ford WM, Menzel JM, Menzel MA, Edwards JW, Kilgo JC (2006). Presence and absence of bats across habitat scales in the upper coastal plain of South Carolina. J. Wildl. Manage. 70: 1200-1209.
Ford WM, Menzel MA, Rodrigue JL, Menzel JM, Johnson JB (2005). Relating bat species presence to simple habitat measures in a central Appalachian forest. Biological Conservation 126:528-539.
Frick WF, Pollock JF, Hicks AC, Langwig KE, Reynolds DS, Turner GG, Butchkoski CM, Kunz TH (2010). An emerging disease causes regional population collapse of a common North American bat species. Science 329:679-682.
Gorresen PM, Miles AC, Todd CM, Bonaccorso FJ, Weller TJ (2008). Assessing bat detectability and occupancy with multiple automated echolocation detectors. J. Mammal. 89:11-17.
Hein CD, Castleberry SB, Miller KV (2009). Site-occupancy of bats in relation to forested corridors. For. Ecol. Manage. 257:1200-1207.
Ingersoll TE, Sewall BJ, Amelon SK (2013). Improved analysis of long-term monitoring data demonstrates marked regional declines of bat populations in the eastern United States. Plos One 8: e65907.
Johnson JB, Edwards JW, Ford WM, Cunningham K, Rodrigue JL (2011a). Fort Drum Millitary Installation Cantonment Area Indiana myotis survey. in Green Mountain Agreement, US Forest Service. #09-PA-11092000-016, pp. 1-61.
Johnson JB, Menzel MA, Edwards JW, Ford WM (2002). A comparison of 2 acoustical bat survey techniques. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 30: 931-936.
Johnson JS, Watrous KS, Giumarro GJ, Peterson TS, Boyden SA, Lacki MJ (2011b). Seasonal and graphical trends in acoustic detection of treeroosting bats. Acta Chiropterol. 13: 157-168.
Kunz TH, Reichard JD (2010). Status review of the little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus) and determination that immediate listing under the Endangered Species Act is scientifically and legally warranted. Boston University. 
Larson DJ, Hayes JP (2000). Variability in sensitivity of Anabat II bat detectors and a method of calibration. Acta Chiropterol. 2: 209-213.
MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Royle JA, Langtimm CA (2002). Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83:2248-2255.
MacKenzie DI, Royle JA (2005). Designing occupancy studies: General advice and allocating survey effort. J. Appl. Ecol. 42:1105-1114.
Milne DJ, Armstrong M, Fisher A, Flores T, Pavey R (2004). A comparison of three survey methods for collecting bat echolocation calls and speciesaccumulation rates from nightly Anabat recordings. Wildl. Res. 31:57-63.
Murray KL, Britzke ER, Hadley BM (1999). Surveying bat communities: a comparison between mist nets and the Anabat II bat detector system. Acta Chiropterol. 1: 105-112.
O'Farrell MJ (1998). A passive monitoring system for Anabat II using a laptop computer. Bat Res. News 39:147-150.
O'Farrell MJ, Gannon WL (1999). A comparison of acoustic versus capture techniques for the inventory of bats. J. Mammal. 80:24-30.
O'Farrell MJ, Miller BW, Gannon WL (1999). Qualitative identification of free-flying bats using the Anabat detector. J. Mammal. 80:11-23.
Turner GG, Reeder DM, Coleman JTH (2011). A five-year assessment of mortality and geographic spread of white-nose syndrome in North American bats and a look to the future. Bat Res. News 52:13-27.
[USFWS] United States Fish and Wildlife Service (2013). White-nose North America's Response to the Devastating Bat Disease.
Weller TJ (2008). Using occupancy estimation to assess the effectiveness of a regional multiple-species conservation plan: Bats in the Pacific Northwest. Biol. Conserv. 141:2279-2289.
Wintle BA, Walshe TV, Parris KM, McCarth MA (2012). Designing occupancy surveys and interpreting non-detection when observations are imperfect. Divers. Distrib. 18:417-424
Yates MD, Muzika RM (2006). Effect of forest structure and fragmentation on site occupancy of bat species in Missouri Ozark forests. J. Wildl. Manage. 70:1238-1248.


APA Laci, S. C., Mark, F. W., Chris, A. D., & Eric, R. B. (2014). Effect of passive acoustic sampling methodology on detecting bats after declines from white nose syndrome. Journal of Ecology and The Natural Environment, 6(2), 56-64.
Chicago Laci S. Coleman, W. Mark Ford, Chris A. Dobony and Eric R. Britzke. "Effect of passive acoustic sampling methodology on detecting bats after declines from white nose syndrome." Journal of Ecology and The Natural Environment 6, no. 2 (2014): 56-64.
MLA Laci S. Coleman, et al. "Effect of passive acoustic sampling methodology on detecting bats after declines from white nose syndrome." Journal of Ecology and The Natural Environment 6.2 (2014): 56-64.
DOI 10.5897/JENE2013.0424

Subscription Form