Full Length Research Paper
Abstract
The current study is designed to find the comparative effects of direct feedback method and indirect feedback method of error treatment on Urdu EFL learners’ writings at intermediate level. To find out the comparative results about these two treatment methods, 46 students having Urdu as their mother tongue were divided into two groups. Errors in writings of one group were treated by direct feedback method while indirect feedback method was adopted to treat the errors of the other group. Repeated measure experimental research design was used to find the accuracy in students’ writings. The study revealed that both methods helped the students to decrease the errors and created accuracy over the time but direct feedback method yielded better results in comparison to indirect feedback group. Comparative effects of two methods on error categories showed that for verb errors, article errors and sentence structure errors direct feedback method was more helpful. While for noun ending errors, wrong word errors, indirect feedback method of error treatment was more useful.
Key words: Comparative study, effectiveness, feedback, EFL learners, writings.
Copyright © 2024 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0