International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation
Subscribe to IJBC
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - E89274067127


Vol.10(1), pp. 39-51 , January 2018
https://doi.org/10.5897/IJBC2017.1113
ISSN: 2141-243X


 Total Views: 0
 Downloaded: 0

Full Length Research Paper

A cost-benefit analysis of protecting Lake George wetland resources in Queen Elizabeth National Park, South Western Uganda



Nabalegwa M. Wambede
  • Nabalegwa M. Wambede
  • Department of Geography and Social Studies, Kyambogo University, Kyambogo, Uganda.
  • Google Scholar
Asaba Joyfred
  • Asaba Joyfred
  • Department of Geography and Social Studies, Kyambogo University, Kyambogo, Uganda.
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 15 May 2017  Accepted: 12 October 2017  Published: 31 January 2018

Copyright © 2018 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


This study estimates the full range of benefits for protecting the use and non-use values of the Lake George wetlands, and the costs of maintaining the benefits flowing from them, so as to derive an estimate of its economic performance. The results indicated that, the Lake George wetlands supplied tangible benefits to the fishing communities, amounting to 0.44% only of all the annual economic benefits of Lake George wetlands in 2004. The intangible but nonetheless important services to the peoples’ livelihoods in the fishing villages accounted for about 99.56% during the same period. Management accounted for at least 3% while wildlife related damage costs (borne by the villages) were the highest at 53.5%. The net social cost benefit of conserving the Lake George wetlands in 2004 was USD 56.4 million or UGS 101.2 billion while the NPV (R = 10.64; t = 25) was USD 491 million. Whereas protection of the Lake George wetlands still remains a viable option, the tangible benefits from the wetlands still remain to be fully realized; the tangible benefits of wetlands are minimal and the local peoples’ interest in protecting the wetland is therefore low. It is recommended that in Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA), 1) tangible benefits as further motivation and creation of local interest in the wetland should be considered, 2) the linkages between use values and ecosystem functions of the wetland must be stressed, and 3) ways of reducing wildlife related damage to the fishing village community lives and property should be discovered.
 
Key words: Use and non-use values, costs and benefits, net present value.

Bakema RJ, Iyango L (2000). Engaging Local Users in the Management of Wetland Resources: The case of the National Wetlands Programme, Uganda.

 

Costanza R, d'Arge R, de'Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S O'Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P (1995). In Muramira, E. (2004). Assessment of the economic value of the wetlands of Bushenyi District in Western Uganda. IUCN, Uganda.

 
 

Dunn I (1989). Fisheries Management Study in the Queen Elizabeth National Park, Uganda. Agriconsulting Economic Analysis: Final Report. Lake Victoria Environnent Management Project.

 
 

Emerton L (1998). Economic Tools for Valuing Wetlands in Eastern Africa. IUCN Eastern Africa Programme, Economics and Biodiversity Programme, IUCN.

 
 

Emerton L, Muramira E (1999). Uganda Biodiversity: Economic Assessment. A report Prepared by IUCN with the National Environment Management Authority as Part of Uganda National Strategy and Action Plan. IUCN, Nairobi.

 
 

Ganf GG (1969). Physiological and Ecological Aspects of the Phytoplankton of Lake George, Uganda. Ph. D Thesis, University of Lancaster. Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise-Use of Biodiversity. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Ministry of Environment and Forests, India.

 
 

Haskoning (2001d). Cost Benefit Analysis of Wetland Resources, Uganda, Part IV.

 
 

Howard P (1995). The Economics of Protected Areas in Uganda: Costs, Benefits and Policy Issues. M.Sc Dissertation. University of Edinburgh.

 
 

Infield M (1989).Socio Economic Survey in the Queen Elizabeth National Park, Uganda, AGRICONSULTING.

 
 

Ministry of Natural Resources (1998). National Ramsar Convention Committee Report.

 
 

Russi D, ten Brink P, Farmer A, Badura T, Coates D, Förster J, Kumar R, Davidson N (2013). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity For Water and Wetlands. London and Brussels: The Institute for European Environmental Policy.

 
 

Schreiber U, Endo T, Mi H, Asada K (1995). Cited in Litlere, T. and A. O. Pedersen (1995). Sustainable Utilization of Papyrus Swamps (Cyperus papyrus) by fishing communities in Queen Elizabeth National Park. M.Sc Thesis. Agricultural University of Norway.

 
 

Springate-Baginski O, Allen D, Darwall WRT (eds.) (2009). An Integrated Wetland Assessment Toolkit: A guide to good practice. Gland: IUCN Species Programme.

 
 

Stelk MJ, Christie J (2014). Ecosystem Service Valuation for Wetland Restoration: What It Is, How To Do It, and Best Practice Recommendations. Association of State Wetland Managers, Windham, Maine.

 
 

The Republic of Uganda (1995). The National Policy for the Conservation and Management of Wetland Resources.

 
 

Turpie J, Smith B, Emerton L, Barnes J (1998). Economic Value of the Zambezi Basin Wetlands. Phase I Report of the Network and Capacity Building Project and Zambezi Basin Wetlands Conservation and Resource Utilization Project. IUCN ROSA, Harare.

 
 

Uganda Wildlife Authority (2000). Queen Elizabeth National Park, Kyambura Wildlife Reserve, Kigezi Wildlife Reserve. General Management Plan. Uganda.

 

 


APA Wambede, N. M., & Joyfred, A. (2018). A cost-benefit analysis of protecting Lake George wetland resources in Queen Elizabeth National Park, South Western Uganda. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 10(1), 39-51.
Chicago Nabalegwa M. Wambede and Asaba Joyfred. "A cost-benefit analysis of protecting Lake George wetland resources in Queen Elizabeth National Park, South Western Uganda." International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation 10, no. 1 (2018): 39-51.
MLA Nabalegwa M. Wambede and Asaba Joyfred. "A cost-benefit analysis of protecting Lake George wetland resources in Queen Elizabeth National Park, South Western Uganda." International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation 10.1 (2018): 39-51.
   
DOI https://doi.org/10.5897/IJBC2017.1113
URL http://www.academicjournals.org/journal/IJBC/article-abstract/E89274067127

Subscription Form