International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation
Subscribe to IJBC
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - B37487C11631


Vol.5(10), pp. 666-670 , October 2013
DOI: 10.5897/IJBC2013.0544
ISSN: 2141-243X
 Total Views: 318
 Downloaded: 328


Full Length Research Paper

Hymenopteran diversity in a deciduous forest from South India


 

Anita Kannagi1*, V. Sivakumar2, V. Santhi1 and Jemima Florence Borgia1




 

1Department of Zoology, Jayaraj Annapackiam College for Women (A), Periyakulam, Theni-625 601, Tamil Nadu, India.

2Department of Zoology, V. O. Chidambaram College, Thoothukudi -628 008, Tamilnadu, India.


Email: anitaarul1911@gmail.com






 Accepted: 27 July 2013  Published: 31 October 2013

Copyright © 2013 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


 

Hymenoptera diversity was investigated in a deciduous forest from South India during July 2009 to June 2010. Among the 38 collected species, the identified 36 species belong to 21 genera and nine families. The dominant families include Vespidae, Apidae, Formicidae, Sphecidae and Megachilidae, respectively. In the present study, the hymenopterans like the carpenter bees, honey bees, leaf cutter bees and ants were abundantly seen during March, April and May. The highest hymenopteran diversity was found during May 2010, where the Shannon’s overall index of diversity was 1.95. The evenness index (E1) was high during September indicating that there is less variation in communities between the species. Most of the Hymenopterans recorded were good pollinators and were seen in plants such asAncardium occidentaleLantana camara and Calotropis gigantea present in the study area. The study indicates a rich and diverse hymenopteran fauna in the deciduous forest.

 

Key words: Hymenoptera, biodiversity, deciduous forest.

Anonymous (2005). Millennium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis. Island Press, Washington DC. http://www. millennium assessment.org/en/index.aspx.
 
Assad YOH, Torto B, Hassanali A, Njagi PGN, Bashir NHH, Mahamat H (1997). Seasonal variation in the essential oil composition of Commiphora quadricincta and its effect on the maturation of immature adults of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. Phytochemistry 44(5):833-841.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(96)00559-6
 
Biesmeije JC, Roberts SPM, Reemer M, Ohlemüller R, Eswards M, Peeters T, Schaffers AP, Potts SG, Kleukers R, Thomas CD, Settele J, Kunin WE (2006). Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313:351-354.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1127863
PMid:16857940
 
Bulte E, Hector A, Larigauderie A (2005). Ecoservices assessing the impact of biodiversity changes on ecosystem functioning and services. Swcience Plan and Implementation Strategy. Diversitas Report p. 3.
 
Forup ML, Henson KSE, Craze PG, Memmott J (2008). The restoration of ecological interactions: plant–pollinator networks on ancient and restored heath lands. J. Appl. Ecol. 45:742-752.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01390.x
 
Itioka M, Inoue T, Kalian M, Kato M (2001). Six year population fluctuation of the giant honey bee Apis dorsata (Hymenoptera:Apidae) in a tropical low land dipterocarp forest in Sarawak. Annuals of the entomological Society of Americ. 94:545- 549.
 
Kato M, Kosaka Y, Kawakita A, Okuyama Y, Kobayashi C, Phimminith T, Thongphan D (2008). Plant pollinator interactions in tropical monsoon forests in South East Asia. Am. J. Bot. 95(11):1375- 1394.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800114
PMid:21628146
 
Kremen C, Williams NM, Aizen MA, Gemmill-Herren B, LeBuhn G, Minckley R, Packer L, Potts SG, Roulston T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Vázquez DP, Winfree R, Adams L, Crone EE, Greenleaf SS, Keitt TH, Klein AM, Regetz J, Ricketts TH (2007). Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol. Lett. 10:299-314.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01018.x
PMid:17355569
 
La Salle J, Gauld ID (1993). Hymenoptera: their diversity, and their impact on the diversity of other organisms. In: La Salle, J and I.D. Gauld (eds.). Hymenoptera and Biodiversity. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. pp. 1-26.
 
Lázaro A, Lundgren R, Totland Ø (2009). Co-flowering neighbors influence the diversity and identity of pollinator groups visiting plant species. Oikos, 118:691-702.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17168.x
 
Mathew G, Shamsudeen RSM, Brijesh CM (2007). Insect fauna of Neyyar wildlife Sanctuary, Kerala, India. Zoo's print J. 22(12):2930- 2933.
http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.1575.2930-3
 
Mathew G, Shamsudeen RSM, Rashmi C (2005). Insect fauna of Peechi-Vazhani wildlife Sanctuary, Kerala, India. Zoo's Print J. 20(8):1955-1960.
http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.1280.1955-60
 
Mathew G, Shamsudeen RSM, Rashmi C, Brijesh CM (2004). Insect fauna of Peppara wildlife Sanctuary, Kerala, India. Zoo's Print J. 19(11):1680-1683.
http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.1063.1680-3
 
Mishra RM, Gupta P, Yadav GP (2004). Intensity and diversity of flower visiting insects in relation to plant density of Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk. Trop. Ecol. 45(2):263-270.
 
Perfectti F, Gómez JM, Bosch J (2009). The functional consequences of diversity in plant-pollinator interactions. Oikos 118:1430-1440.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17491.x
 
Potts SG, Woodcock BA, Roberts SPM, Tscheulin T, Pilgrim ES, Brown VK, Tallowin JR (2009). Enhancing pollinator biodiversity in intensive grasslands. J. Appl. Ecol. 46:369-379.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01609.x
 
Singh OT, Chakravorty J, Varatharajan R (2010). Entomofauna of Kane wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh, North eastern India. J. Threatened Taxa. 2(13):1392- 1400.
http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o1946.1392-400
 
Sparks TH, Greatorexdavies JN, Mountford JO, Hall ML, Marrs RH (1996). The effects of shade on the plant communities of rides in plantation woodlands and implications for butterfly conservation. For. Ecol. Manage. 80(1-3):197-207.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(95)03639-3
 
Sparks TH, Parish T (1995). Factors affecting the abundance of Butterflies in the field boundaries in Swaresey fens, Cambridge, UK. Biological conservation. 73(3):221.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(94)00112-4
 
Steffan-Dewenter I, Westphal C (2008). The interplay of pollinator diversity, pollination services and landscape change. J. Appl. Ecol. 45:737-774.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01483.x
 
Suresh PV, Sudheenadrakumar VV, Binoy CF, George Mathew, Narendran TC (1999). The macro hymenopteran fauna of Parambikulam wildlife sanctuary. Zoo's Print. 14:4.

 


APA (2013). Hymenopteran diversity in a deciduous forest from South India. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 5(10), 666-670.
Chicago   Anita Kannagi, V. Sivakumar, V. Santhi and Jemima Florence Borgia. "Hymenopteran diversity in a deciduous forest from South India." International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation 5, no. 10 (2013): 666-670.
MLA Anita Kannagi, et al. "Hymenopteran diversity in a deciduous forest from South India." International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation 5.10 (2013): 666-670.
   
DOI 10.5897/IJBC2013.0544
URL http://www.academicjournals.org/journal/IJBC/article-abstract/B37487C11631

Subscription Form