OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS

           
home about us journals search

Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Reviews

     
   BMBR Home
   About BMBR
   Submit Manuscripts
   Instructions for Authors
   Editors
   Call For Paper
   Archive
   Faculty 1000
   Conferences
   Associations

Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. Rev.


Vol. 6 No. 3



Viewing options:


 • Abstract
 • Full text
 • Reprint (PDF) (297K)

Search Pubmed for articles by:

 

 Singh B

 Satyanarayana T

 

Other links:

PubMed Citation

Related articles in PubMed

 

 

Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Reviews Vol. 6(3), pp. 69–87, March 2011

ISSN 1538-2273 ©2011 Academic Journals

 

 

Review

 

Developments in biochemical aspects and biotechnological applications of microbial phytases

 

Bijender Singh1*, Gotthard Kunze3 and T. Satyanarayana2

 

1Department of Microbiology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak- 124 001, India.

2Department of Microbiology, University of Delhi South Campus, Benito Juarez Road, New Delhi-110 021, India.

3Leibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK), Corrensstr. 3, D-06466 Gatersleben, Germany.

 

*Corresponding author. E-mail: ohlanbs@gmail.comFax: 091-11-24115270.     

 

Accepted 8 December, 2010

   

Abstract

 

Abstract
Introduction
Phytic acid
Phytases
An idea
Biochemical
Crystal
Directed
Multifarious
Conclusion
References

 

 

Phytases belong to the class of phosphatases, which catalyze the hydrolysis of phytic acid to inorganic phosphate and myo-inositol phosphate derivatives. The enzyme has potential applications in food and feed industries for ameliorating digestibility and assimilation of nutrients of foods and feeds by mitigating the anti-nutritional effects of phytic acid. Phytases have been shown to be useful in improving growth of poultry, pigs and fishes, and they play a role in promoting growth of plants, as well as improve the nutritional quality of bread, soymilk and oil seed cakes by dephytinization. The crystal structures of some phytases have been analyzed for understanding the reaction mechanism. The phytases with desirable properties have been generated through protein engineering approaches, since native phytases do not possess all the properties of an ideal additive feed/food. Recent developments on the characteristics of an ideal phytase, crystal structure, protein engineering, and the potential biotechnological applications of microbial phytases with special reference to their utility in improving growth performance of monogastrics, dephytinization of foods and feeds, plant growth promotion, and combating environmental phosphorus pollution will be discussed in this review.

 

Key words: Phytic acid, microbial phytase, crystal structure, monogastrics, protein engineering, dephytinization, plant growth promotion.

 

 

 

 

Introduction

 

Abstract
Introduction
Phytic acid
Phytases
An idea
Biochemical
Crystal
Directed
Multifarious
Conclusion
References

 

 

The hydrolysis of phytic acid to myo-inositol and inorganic phosphate by phytases (myo-inositol hexakisphosphate phosphohydrolase) is an important reaction for energy metabolism, metabolic regulation and signal transduction pathways in biological systems. Although phytic acid (myo-inositolhexakis phosphate), which is an organic form of phosphorus (P), is abundantly present in plants’ materials (1 to 5% by weight) such as edible legumes, cereals, oilseeds, pollen and nuts, it is largely unavailable to monogastrics like poultry birds, pigs, fishes and humans, due to the lack of adequate levels of phytases (Wodzinski and Ullah, 1996; Vohra and Satyanarayana, 2003; Vats and Banerjee, 2004; Greiner and Konietzny,  2006;   Rao   et   al.,  2009).  The phytic acid present in the plant derived foods acts as an anti-nutritional factor, since it causes mineral deficiency due to efficient chelation of metal ions such as Ca2+, Mg2+, Zn2+ and Fe2+, which form complexes with proteins, and thus affect their digestion and also inhibit certain digestive enzymes like a-amylase, trypsin, acid phosphatase and tyrosinase (Harland and Morris, 1995). Due to the lack of adequate levels of phytases in monogastric animals, phytic acid is excreted in faeces, which on degradation by soil microorganisms, release phosphorus in the soil. The phosphorus reaches aquatic bodies that cause eutrophication (Mullaney et al., 2000). Phytic acid can be removed by some physical (autoclaving, cooking and steeping) and chemical (ion exchange and acid hydrolysis) methods, but these methods decrease the nutritional value of foods. The reduction of phytic acid content in foods and feeds by enzymatic hydrolysis using phytase is desirable since it improves  their  nutritional  value. Besides its immense commercial value in food and feed industries, the enzyme has potential applications in other fields too. The annual sale of commercial supplemental phytase is estimated at US$ 50 million, which is one-third of the entire feed enzyme market (Sheppy, 2001) and recently increased to 150 million euro (Greiner and Konietzny, 2006). The term phytase has been used in this article to mean microbial.

During the last 15 years, phytases have attracted considerable attention from both scientists and entrepreneurs in the areas of nutrition, environmental protection and biotechnology. Undoubtedly, increasing public concern regarding the environmental impact of high phosphorus levels in animal excreta has driven the biotechnological development of phytase and its application in animal nutrition. The feeding trials have shown the effectiveness of supplemental microbial phytases in improving utilization of phytate-P and the phytate-bound minerals by swine, poultry and fishes (Lei and Stahl, 2001; Singh et al., 2006; Cao et al., 2007; Selle and Ravindran, 2007, 2008; Rao et al., 2009). Inorganic P supplementation of the diets for swine and poultry can be obviated by including adequate amounts of phytase along with an appropriate manipulation of other dietary factors (Han et al., 1997). As a result, the P excretion of these animals may be reduced by about 50% (Lei et al., 1993a, b; Satyanarayana and Vohra, 2003; Vohra et al., 2006). The cost and thermotolerance constraints  of  the  current  commercial  phytases   have, however, precluded the widespread use of these enzymes in animal feeds.

   Several reviews have been published recently on the phytases, which mainly focused on the production, characteristics and their basic applications (Pandey et al., 2001; Vohra and Satyanarayana, 2003; Vats and Banerjee, 2004; Greiner and Konietzny, 2006; Kaur et al., 2007; Fu et al., 2008; Rao et al., 2009). None of these dealt with the ideal and designer phytase, crystal structure and the directed evolution and protein engineering of phytases; and therefore, a comprehensive account is given in this review on the recent developments on all these aspects of microbial phytases and their potential biotechnological applications.

 

 

 

 

Phytic acid: A friend or foe

 
Abstract
Introduction
Phytic acid
Phytases
An idea
Biochemical
Crystal
Directed
Multifarious
Conclusion
References
 

 

Phytic acid is the major storage form of phosphorus in cereals, legumes and oilseeds (Maga, 1982; Tyagi et al., 1998). It has several physiological roles and also affects the functional and nutritional properties of food ingredients. The correct chemical description of phytic acid is myo-inositol 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6-hexakis dihydrogen phosphate (IUPAC-IUB, 1977). Phytic acid occurs primarily as salts of mono- and divalent cations (for example, potassium-magnesium salt in rice and calcium-magnesium-potassium salt in soybeans) in discrete regions   of   cereal   grains   and  legumes  (Figure  1).  It accumulates in seeds and grains during ripening along with other storage substances such as starch and lipids. In cereals and legumes, phytic acid accumulates in the aleurone particles and globoid crystals, respectively (Reddy et al., 1982; Tyagi et al., 1998).

Besides phosphate storage, phytate acts as a strong chelator for divalent metal cations and exists as a stable metal-phytate complex with metal ions in plants (Asada et al., 1969; Reddy et al., 1982). Phytic acid in seeds and grains serves as a phosphorus store, an energy store, a source of cations, a source of myo-inositol, and also helps in initiating dormancy. Phytic acid may also serve several other unknown functions in seeds (Reddy et al., 1982). Graf et al. (1987) suggested that the role of phytic acid in seeds is a natural antioxidant during dormancy. Phytic acid has been shown to exert an antineoplastic effect in animal models of both colon and breast carcinomas. The presence of undigested phytic acid in the colon may protect against the development of colonic carcinoma (Iqbal et al., 1994). The inositol phosphate intermediates play an important role in the transport of materials into the cell, and the role of inositol triphosphates, especially in signal transduction and regulation of cell functions in plant and animal cells, is a very active area of research in order to understand signaling pathways (Wodzinski and Ullah, 1996; Vohra and Satyanarayana, 2003; Greiner and Konietzny, 2006; Rao et al., 2009). Besides these functions, phytic acid also acts as an anti-nutritional factor in several ways due to the interactions with metal ions, proteins and enzymes.

 

 

                                                                      

                                                  Figure 1. Interaction of phytic acid with metals, proteins and carbohydrate.

 

 

   

Phytases

 
Abstract
Introduction
Phytic acid
Phytases
An idea
Biochemical
Crystal
Directed
Multifarious
Conclusion
References
 

 

Phytases myo-inositolhexaphosphate phosphohydrolase) hydrolyze phytic acid to myo-inositol and inorganic phosphates through a series of myo-inositol phosphate intermediates, and eliminate its anti-nutritional characteristics. Phytase is widespread in nature, and it occurs in microorganisms, plants and some animals (Wodzinski and Ullah, 1996; Vohra and Satyanarayana, 2003; Angelis et al., 2003; Vats and Banerjee, 2004; Kaur et al., 2007; Fu et al., 2008; Rao et al., 2009; Raghavendra and Halami, 2009). A large number of bacteria, filamentous fungi and yeasts have been reported to produce phytase extra- and intra-cellularly as well as in the cell-bound form (Shieh and Ware, 1968; Wodzinski and Ullah, 1996; Pandey et al., 2001; Vohra and Satyanarayana, 2003; Vats and Banerjee, 2004; Kaur et al., 2007; Fu et al., 2008; Rao et al., 2009). A list of phytase producing organisms is given in Table 1. There are two types of phytases as classified by Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (NC-IUBMB) in consultation with the IUPAC-IUBMB Joint Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature (JCBN): 3-phytase (EC 3.1.3.8)  that  first  hydrolyses  the  ester  bond  at  the   3 position of myo-inositol hexakisphosphate, and is mainly reported in microorganisms; and the 6-phytase (EC 3.1.3.26) that first hydrolyses the ester bond at the 6 position of myo-inositol hexakisphosphate, and is mostly reported in plants. This had also been reported in some basidiomycetous fungi (Lassen et al., 2001). An alkaline 5-phytase from lily pollen was found to start phytate hydrolysis at the D-5 position (Barrientos et al., 1994). Phytases can be broadly categorized into two major classes based on the pH for activity: acid phytases and alkaline phytases (Figure 2). More focus has been on acidic phytases because of their applicability in animal feeds and broader substrate specificity than those of alkaline phytases. Recently, phytases have also been classified as HAP (Histidine acid phosphatase), BPP (b-Propeller phytase), CP (cysteine phosphatase) and PAP (purple acid phosphatase) based on their catalytic properties (Mullaney and Ullah, 2003).

 

 

 

  Table 1. Optimized culture conditions for the production of phytase by various microorganisms.     

 

Culture conditions

Microbial strain

pHopt

Topt

Fermentation

Carbon source

Nitrogen source

Reference           

Filamentous fungi

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. fumigatus SRRC 322

5.0

37

SmF*

Hylon starch

NaNO3

Mullaney et al. (2000)        

A. niger

5.5

30

SmF

Glucose starch

--

Vats and Banerjee (2005)

A. ficuum

5.0

30

SmF

Corn starch, glucose

NaNO3

Shieh and Ware (1968)

A. oryzae

6.4

37

SmF

Glucose

(NH4)2SO4

Shimizu (1993)

Rhizopus oligosporus

5.5

27

SmF

Corn starch, glucose

NaNO3

Casey and Walsh (2004)

R. oryzae

5.5

30

SSF#

Glucose

NH4NO3

Ramachandaran et al. (2005)

Mucor racemosus

5.5

30

SSF

Starch

NaNO3

Roopesh et al. (2005)        

Peniophora lycii

5.5

26

SmF

Maltodextrin, soya flour

Peptone

Lassen et al. (2001)

Thermoascus aurantiacus

5.5

45

SmF

Starch, glucose, wheat bran

Peptone

Nampoothiri et al. (2004)

Rhizomucor pusillus

8.0

50

SSF

Wheat bran

Asparagine

Chadha et al. (2004)

Myceliopthora thermophila

5.5

45

SmF

Glucose

NaNO3

Mitchell et al. (1997)

Sporotrichum thermophile

5.0

45

SmF

Starch, glucose

Peptone

Singh and Satyanarayana                 (2008a) 

S. thermophile

5.0

45

SSF

Sesame oil cake, glucose

(NH4)2SO4

Singh and Satyanarayana (2006a)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yeasts

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pichia anomala

6.0

25

SmF

Glucose

Beef extract

Vohra and Satyanarayana                 (2001)

Schwanniomyces castellii

4.4

77

SmF

Galactose

(NH4)2SO4

Segueilha et al. (1992)

Arxula adeninivorans

5.5

28

SmF

Galactose

Yeast extract

Sano et al. (1999)

P. rhodanensis

4.5

70

SmF

Glucose

-

Nakamura et al. (2000)

P. spartinae

4.5

75

SmF

Glucose

-

Nakamura et al. (2000)

Candida krusei

4.6

40

SmF

Glucose

Polypeptone

Quan et al. (2001)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bacteria

 

 

 

 

 

 

B. subtilis

7.0

37

SmF

Glucose

NH4NO3

Kerovuo et al. (1998)

B. amyloliquefaciens

6.8

37

SmF

Glucose

Casein, peptone

Idriss et al. (2002)

Escherichia coli

7.0

37

SmF

--

Tryptone

Sunita et al. (2000)

Klebsiella aerogenes

7.0

30

SmF

Sodium phytate

Yeast extract

Tambe et al. (1994)

Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis*

5.5

37

SmF

Maltose, glucose

Yeast extract

Angelis et al. (2003)

L. fructivorans*

5.5

37

SmF

Maltose, glucose

Yeast extract

Angelis et al. (2003)

L. lactis subsp lactis*

5.5

37

SmF

Maltose, glucose

Yeast extract

Angelis et al. (2003)

L. rhamnosus*

6.5

37

SmF

Glucose

Yeast extract

Raghavendra and Halami (                2009)

L. amylovorus*

6.5

37

SmF

Glucose

Yeast extract

Raghavendra and Halami                 (2009)

Pediococcus pentosaceus*

6.5

37

SmF

Glucose

Yeast extract

Raghavendra and Halami (                2009)

 

       *SmF = Submerged fermentation, #SSF = Solid state fermentation.

 

 

 

           Figure 2. Schematic representation of the hydrolysis of substrate by histidine acid phytase and b-propeller phytase.

 

 

   

An ideal phytase and its designing

 

Abstract
Introduction
Phytic acid
Phytases
An idea
Biochemical
Crystal
Directed
Multifarious
Conclusion
References
 

 

The phytase that has the desirable characteristics for application in animal feed industry can be called an ‘ideal phytase’, which should be active in the stomach, stable during animal feed processing and storage, and easily processed by the feed manufacturer for its suitability as an animal feed additive.

Phytase should not be detected at the end of the small intestine. This is necessary because in this way the phytase produced by genetically modified organisms should not enter the environment (Jongbloed et al., 1992). Furthermore, it should be effective in releasing phytate-P in the digestive tract and stable to resist proteases (trypsin and pepsin) and inactivation by heat during feed pelleting and storage with low cost of production. The ability of any given phytase to hydrolyze phytate-P in the digestive tract is determined by its properties, such as catalytic efficiency, substrate specificity, temperature and pH optima, which are resistance to proteases. As the stomach is the main functional site of supplemental phytase, a phytase with pH optimum in the acidic range is desirable for improving nutrition. Also, phytase must exhibit resistance to pepsin and trypsin, which are encountered in the intestine. Since the food and feeds are often processed through a pelleting machine at 65 to 80°C with steam to eliminate salmonellae, an ideal phytase must be able to withstand the high temperature and steam encountered during the pelleting process.

Similarly, an enzyme that can tolerate long-term storage or transport at ambient temperature is generally preferred for food and feed industry. Finally, a phytase produced in high yield and purity by a relatively inexpensive system is attracting for food industries worldwide. It is now realized that any single phytase may never be ‘ideal’ for all feeds and foods. For example, the stomach pH in finishing pigs is much more acidic than that of weanling pigs (Radcliffe et al., 1998). Thus, phytase with optimum pH close to 3.0 will perform better in the former than in the latter. For poultry, an enzyme would be beneficial if it is active over broad pH range, that is, acidic (stomach) to neutral pH (crop) (Riley and Austic, 1984). Phytases used for aquaculture application require a lower temperature that is optimum than the swine or poultry (Ramseyer et al., 1999). The choice of an organism for phytase production is, therefore, dependent upon the target application. Nowadays, there is a great demand for the development of an ideal phytase using directed evolution and protein engineering.

Based on this, the desirable and ideal phytase could be designed as per target application. All these features are not present within a single phytase, and therefore, based on the sequence of the available phytases, a consensus phytase could be designed (Lehman et al., 2000a, b, c). Genetic engineering techniques such as site directed mutagenesis could be employed for further ameliorating the properties. The strategies used for the designing and developing of an ideal phytase are presented in Figure 3.

 


 

   


                                                     Figure 3. Designing an ideal phytase for biotechnological applications.

 

 

 

   

Biochemical and molecular characteristics of phytases

 

Abstract
Introduction
Phytic acid
Phytases
An idea
Biochemical
Crystal
Directed
Multifarious
Conclusion
References
 

 

The major properties of enzymes are useful in determining their potential in different industries. The biochemical and molecular properties of some phytases are presented in Table 2.

Phytases with high temperature optima are desirable in the animal feed industry because feed pelleting involves a step of 80 to 85°C for few seconds (Wyss et al., 1999a). Phytase of A. fumigatus (Pasamontes et al., 1997b) and A. niger NRRL 3135 (Howson and Davis, 1983) exhibited optimum activity at 37°C and at 55°C, respectively. Phytase of S. castellii was optimally active at 77°C (Segueilha et al., 1992) and that of Arxula adeninivorans at 75°C (Sano et al., 1999). The phytases from Pichia rhodanensis and P. spartinae showed optimal reaction temperature at 70 to 75°C and 75 to 80°C, respectively (Nakamura et al., 2000), while that of Pichia anomala showed optimal activity at 60°C (Vohra and Satyanarayana,  2002).  Among  the  thermophilic   fungi, Thermomyces lanuginosus phytase exhibited optimum activity (Berka et al., 1998), and that of Rhizomucor pusillus at 70°C (Chadha et al., 2004). Phytases of Thermoascus aurantiacus (Nampoothiri et al., 2004) and S. thermophile (Singh and Satyanarayana, 2009) were optimally active at 55°C and 60°C, respectively (Table 3). Phytase from B. subtilis (Powar and Jagannathan, 1982), E. coli (Greiner et al., 1993), Klebsiella aerogenes (Tambe et al., 1994), Enterobacter sp.4 (Yoon et al., 1996), K. oxytoca MO-3 (Jareonkitmongkol et al., 1997), Selenomonas ruminantium (Yanke et al., 1998) were optimally active in the temperature range between 50 and 60°C, while phytase of Aerobacter aerogenes had an optima at 25°C (Greaves et al., 1967), and that of Bacillus sp. DS11 at 70°C (Kim et al., 1998).

Most microbial phytases studied so far show their optimum activity in the acidic pH range (Pandey et al., 2001;    Vohra   and   Satyanarayana,   2003;   Vats   and Banerjee, 2004; Singh and Satyanarayana, 2009; Rao et al., 2009). Phytases from fungal origin exhibit optimal activity at pH 4.5 to 5.5, while some bacterial enzymes at pH 6.5 to 7.5. For the phytase of Aerobacter aerogenes (Greaves et al., 1967), Pseudomonas sp. (Irving and Cosgrove, 1971), E. coli (Greiner et al., 1993), Selenomonas ruminantium (Yanke et al., 1998) and Lactobacillus amylovorus (Sreeramulu et al., 1996), the pH optimum was between 4.0 and 5.5. The pH optimum for the phytase of Enterobacter sp.4 (Yoon et al., 1996) and Bacillus sp. DS11 (Kim et al., 1998) was at 7 to 7.5. A. niger NRRL 3135 secreted two different phytases, one with pH optima at 5.5 and 2.5, and the other at 2.0; as such, these enzymes were designated as phyA and phyB, respectively (Howson and Davis, 1983). Phytases of T. lanuginosus (Berka et al., 1998) and A. fumigatus (Pasamontes et al., 1997b) were optimally active at pH 6.0 to 6.5. The yeast phytases showed optimal activity in the pH range of 4.0 to 5.0 (Nakamura  et  al.,  2000).  The cell-bound phytase of Pichia anomala was maximally activated at pH 4.0 (Vohra and Satyanarayana, 2002), while that for S. castellii phytase was at pH 4.4 (Segueilha et al., 1992) and Arxula adeninivorans was at pH 4.5 (Sano et al., 1999). Phytases of plant origin have pH optima in the range between 4.0 and 5.6. Recently, alkaline phytase having maximum activity at pH 8.0 was reported from legume seeds (Scott, 1986). Another alkaline phytase was detected in the mature lily pollen that exhibited optimal activity at pH 8.0 (Hara et al., 1985).

Phytases usually show broad substrate spectrum with the highest affinity for phytate. The A. fumigatus, Emericella nidulans and M. thermophila phytases exhibited broad substrate specificity, while phytases of A. niger, A. terreus CBS and E. coli were rather specific for phytic acid (Wyss et al., 1999b). Broad substrate specificity was reported for phytases of S. castellii (Segueilha et al., 1992) and S. thermophile (Singh and Satyanarayana, 2009), while cell-bound phytase from P. anomala exhibited broad substrate specificity (Vohra and Satyanarayana, 2002). Only a few phytases have been described as highly specific for phytate such as the alkaline phytases from B. subtilis  (Powar  and  Jagannathan, 1982; Shimizu, 1992), B. amyloliquefaciens (Kim et al., 1998), lily pollen and cattail pollen (Hara et al., 1985). The acid phytases from E. coli (Greiner et al., 1993), A. niger and A. terreus (Wyss et al., 1999a) had also been reported to be rather specific for phytate.

With the exception of the phytases from Emericella nidulans and Myceliophthora thermophila (Mitchell et al., 1997), all phytases hitherto studied follow Michaelis-Menten kinetics. In general, phytases from microbial sources exhibit the highest turnover number with phytate, whereas their plant counterparts yield the highest relative rates of hydrolysis with pyrophosphate and ATP (Greiner and Konietzny, 2006). Most of the phytases characterized so far displayed the highest affinity to phytate among all phosphorylated compounds tested. The Km values of the phytases ranged between 10 and 650 μM (Table 3). Relatively low Km values have been reported for the phytases from A. niger (10 to 40 μM), A. terreus (11 to 23 μM), A. fumigatus (<10 μM), Schwanniomyces castellii (38 μM), K. aerogenes (62 μM) and some plant phytaes (Greiner and Konietzny, 2006). The Km and Vmax values of S. thermophile phytase were 0.156 mM and   83.4  U mg-1   protein s-1   for    phytic    acid, respectively (Singh and Satyanarayana, 2009). The catalytic constants for the degradation of phytate by phytases reported so far ranged between <10 (soybean and maize) and 1744 s-1 (E. coli) [Greiner and Konietzny, 2006]. The kinetic efficiency of an enzyme is validated by means of the kcat/Km values for a given substrate. The phytase of E. coli had a kcat/Km value of 1.34 x 107 M-1 s-1 (Golovan et al., 2001), which is the highest value reported for any phytase. The turnover number of 6209 s-1 and of 4.78 x 107 m-1s-1 was reported for E. coli phytase (Greiner et al., 1993). The kcat/Km value of the recombinant phytase of P. anomala expressed in Hansenula polymorpha is 72.5 (μM−1 s−1) (Kaur et al., 2010).

Phytases are high molecular weight proteins ranging between 40 and 700 kDa (Table 3). The majority of phytases characterized so far acted like monomeric proteins with molecular masses between 40 and 70 kDa. However, some phytate-degrading enzymes appear to be made up of multiple subunits. Phytase of S. castellii has a molecular weight of 490 kDa with a glycosylation of around 31% (Seguilha et al., 1992). The glycosylated protein was tetrameric, with one large subunit (MW 125 kDa) and three identical small  subunits  (MW  70  kDa).  Purified   phytase from A. fumigatus revealed a protein with a molecular mass of 60 kDa by SDS-PAGE (Pasamontes et al., 1997a). The molecular masses of the monomeric form of phyA, phyB and acid phosphatase were estimated by SDS-PAGE as 85, 65 and 85 kDa, respectively. An extracellular phytase and an extracellular acid phosphatase were purified from A. oryzae K1 and their molecular masses were 60 and 70 kDa, respectively (Shimizu, 1993). The phytase of A. niger van Teighem was a 353 kDa homopentameric protein with a monomeric molecular mass of 66 kDa (Vats and Banerjee, 2005), while the phytase of S. thermophile is a homopentameric 456 kDa glycosylated protein with a monomeric mass of 90 kDa (Singh and Satyanarayana, 2009), and that of P. anomala is a homohexamer with a molecular mass of 390 kDa (Kaur et al., 2010). The rat intestine phytase was reported to be a heterodimer comprising 70- and 90-kDa subunits (Yang et al., 1991). However, the phytases isolated from maize roots (Hubel and Beck, 1996), germinating maize seeds (Laboure et al., 1993), tomato roots (Li et al., 1997), soybean seeds (Hegeman and Grabau, 2001) and A. oryzae (Shimizu, 1993) were homodimeric proteins, while a homohexameric structure was proposed for the A. terreus enzyme (Yamamoto et al., 1972). Two different forms of phytases have been reported in K. aerogenes (Tambe et al., 1994). One, possibly the native enzyme, has an exceptionally large size (700 kDa), and the other, may be a fraction of the native enzyme, exhibits an exceedingly small molecular mass (10 to 13 kDa) with full complement of the activity. Fungal and several plant phytases have been found to be glycosylated with a carbohydrate content of 27.3% (Ullah, 1988). Glycosylation may have an effect on the catalytic properties, the stability or the isoelectric point of an enzyme. The molecular mass and the homogeneity of the purified enzyme from Bacillus sp. DS11 were estimated by    gel    filtration    and    SDS-PAGE.    PAGE     under denaturation conditions revealed a single protein band of 44 kDa whose size corresponded well with the molecular mass of 40 kDa obtained by superose-12 column chromatography (Kim et al., 1998). An extracellular phytase of B. subtilis (natto) N-77, purified 322-fold by gel filtration and DEAE chromatography had a molecular mass of 36 kDa (Shimizu, 1992), whereas two periplasmic phytases (P1 and P2) purified from E. coli close to homogeneity, were monomers with a molecular mass of 42 kDa (Greiner et al., 1993).

 

 

 

Table 2. The biochemical properties of phytases from various microbes.

 

Source

MW(kDa)

Topt

pHopt

Km(mM)

pI

Specificity

Reference

Fungi              

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. fumigatus

75

58

5.0

-

-

-

Mullaney et al. (2000)  

A. niger

85

58

2.5 5.0

0.04

4.5

P

Ullah and Gibson (1987)

A. niger SK-57

60

50

5.5, 2.5

0.0187

-

P

Nagashima et al. (1999)

A. niger

-

55

5.5

0.20

4.9

-

Berka et al. (1998)

A. niger

353

55

2.5

0.606

-

P

Vats and Banerjee (2005)

A. oryzae

120–140

50

5.5

0.33

4.15

B

Shimizu (1993)

A. nidulans

77.8

55

5.5

-

-

-

Wyss et al. (1999b)

R. oligosporus

-

55

4.5

0.15

-

-

Sutardi and Buckle (1988)

A. niger ATCC9142

84

65

5.0

0.10

-

B

Casey and Walsh (2003)

R. oligosporus

124

65

5.00

0.010

-

B

Casey and Walsh (2004)

Peniophora lycii

72

50-55

4-4.5

-

3.61

-

Lassen et al. (2001)

Ceriporia sp.

59

55-60

5.5-6.0

-

7.36-8.01

-

Lassen et al. (2001)

Agrocybe pediades

59

50

5.0-6.0

-

4.15-4.86

-

Lassen et al. (2001)

Trametes pubescens

62

50

5.0-5.5

-

3.58

-

Lassen et al. (2001)

Thermomyces lanuginosus

60

65

7.0

0.11

4.7-5.2

B

Berka et al. (1998)

Thermoascus aurantiacus

-

55

-

-

-

-

Nampoothiri et al. (2004)

Rhizomucor pusillus

-

70

5.4

-

-

B

Chadha et al. (2004)

Myceliopthora thermophila

-

37

6.0

-

-

B

Mitchell et al. (1997)

Sporotrichum termophile

456

60

5.5

0.15

4.9

B

Singh and Satyanarayana (2009)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yeasts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

-

45

4.6

-

-

-

Nayini and Markakis (1984)

Schwanomyces castellii

490

77

4.4

0.038

-

B

Segueilha et al. (1992)

Arxula adeninivorans

-

75

4.5

0.25

-

P

Sano et al. (1999)

Candida krusei WZ001#

330

40

4.6

-

-

-

Nakamura et al. (2000)

Pichia anomala#

64

60

4.0

0.20

-

B

Vohra and Satyanarayana (2002)

P. rhodanensis

-

70-75

4.0-4.5

0.25

-

-

Nakamura et al. (2000)

P. spartinae

-

75-80

4.5-5.0

0.33

-

-

Nakamura et al. (2000)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bacteria

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerobactor aerogens*

-

25

4.0-5.0

0.135

-

-

Greaves et al. (1967)

Bacillus sp. DS 11

-

70

7.0

0.55

5.3

P

Kim et al. (1998)

Bacillus subtilis

37

60

7.5

0.04

-

-

Powar and Jagannathan (1982)

B. subtilis (natto)

38

60

6.0–6.5

-

-

-

Shimizu (1992)

B. subtilis

43

55

7.0–7.5

-

6.5

P

Kerovuo et al. (1998)

B. subtilis

44

55

6.0-7.0

-

5.0

P

Tye et al. (2002)

B. icheniformis

47

65

6.0-7.0

-

5.1

-

Tye et al. (2002)

B. amyloliquefaciens

44

70

7.0–7.5

-

-

-

Kim et al. (1998)

Escherichia coli*

42

55

4.5

0.13

6.3-6.5

P

Greiner et al. (1993)

Klebsiella oxytoca

40

55

5.0–6.0

-

-

-

Jareonkitmongkol et al. (1997)

K. aerogenes

700

65

4.5

-

3.7

P

Tambe et al. (1994)

Pseudomonas syringe*

47

40

5.5

0.38

-

P

Cho et al. (2003)           

Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis*

50

45

4.0

-

5.0

B

Angelis et al. (2003)

 

 Phytase location is *intracellular, #Cell bound and in all other cases it is extracellular; B = Broad spectrum, P = Phytate specific.

 

 

  

                     Table 3. List of commercially available microbial phytases (Modified from Cao et al., 2007).

 

Company

Phytase source

Production strain

Trademark

AB Enzymes

Aspergillus awamori

Trichoderma reesei

Finase

Alko Biotechnology

A. oryzae

A. oryzae

SP, TP and SF

Alltech

A. niger

A. niger

Allzyme phytase

BASF

A. niger

A. niger

Natuphos

Biozyme

A. oryzae

A. oryzae

AMAFERM

DSM

P. lycii

A. oryzae

Bio-Feed phytase

Fermic

A. oryzae

A. oryzae

Phyzyme

Finnfeeds International

A. awamori

T. reesei

Avizyme

Roal

A. awamori

T. reesei

Finase

 

 

 

 

Novozyme

Peniophora lycii

A. oryzae

Ronozyme®

Roxazyme®

 

 


 

   

Crystal structure of phytases

 
Abstract
Introduction
Phytic acid
Phytases
An idea
Biochemical
Crystal
Directed
Multifarious
Conclusion
References
 

 

For designing an ideal phytase and its genetic engineering, it is important to have an idea about its structure. Therefore, scientists all over the world are working on this aspect. Recently, the crystal structure of phytase from Klebsiella sp. ASR1 has been determined to 1.7 Å resolution using single-wavelength anomalous-diffraction phasing (Bohm et al., 2010). The phytase is different from the E. coli phytase in its sequence and phytate degradation pathway, but the overall structure of Klebsiella phytase is similar to other histidine-acid phosphatases, such as E. coli phytase and human prostatic-acid phosphatase. The stucture of this phytase consisted of two domains (one α and one α ⁄ β domain) in which the active site is present in a positively charged cleft between these domains.

The crystal structures of the phytases from A. niger (Kostrewa et al., 1997), E. coli (Lim et al., 2000) and B. amyloliquefaciens (Ha et al., 2000) have been determined. The structures of the A. niger and E. coli enzyme closely resembled the overall fold of other histidine acid phosphatases. These structures contained a conserved a/b-domain and a variable a-domain and the active site is present at the interface between these domains.  This  structure  also  provides  the   information about substrate binding and the catalytic mechanism. In case of E. coli phytase, it was shown that the phosphate is co-ordinated by the two arginine residues of the RHGXRXP-motif, as well as by conserved residues downstream, a further arginine residue and the histidine and aspartate residue of the HD-motif. Furthermore, the histidine residue of the RHGXRXP-motif was shown to be oriented for nucleophilic attack. The phytase from S. ruminantium shared no sequence identity with other microbial phytases (Chu et al., 2004). The active site of this phytase is located close to a conserved cysteine-containing (Cys241) P loop. The co-crystallization of myo-inositol hexasulfate, with the enzyme revealed that the inhibitor was bound in a pocket slightly away from Cys241 and at the substrate binding site where the phosphate group to be hydrolyzed is held close to the -SH group of Cys241. Crystal structure of Aspergillus fumigatus phytase was determined at 1.5 Å resolution to understand the structural basis for its high thermostability (Xiang et al., 2004). However, the overall folding has a resemblance with the structure of other phytases.

Crystal forms I and II were obtained with CdCl2 and HgCl2 and diffracted to 1.5 Å and 2.25 Å resolution, respectively (Lim and Jia, 2002). Hg2+ and Cd2+ both acted as molecular bridge(s) and played a crucial role in the crystallization of phytase by bridging neighbouring molecules. Despite a lack of sequence similarity, the structure closely resembled the overall folds of other histidine acid phosphatases (Lim et al., 2000). The crystal structure of a thermostable, calcium-dependent and beta propeller type Bacillus phytase, complexed with inorganic phosphate, revealed that two phosphates and four calcium ions are tightly bound at the active site (Shin et al., 2001). Mutation of the residues involved in the calcium chelation resulted in severe defects in the enzyme activity. One phosphate ion, chelating all of the four calcium ions, is close to a water molecule bridging two of the bound calcium ions. The enzyme has two phosphate binding sites, the ‘cleavage site’, which is responsible for the hydrolysis of a substrate, and the ‘affinity site’, that increases the binding affinity for substrates containing adjacent phosphate groups.

The crystal structure of A. niger NRRL3135 phytase determined at 2.5 Å resolution served to specify all active site residues (Tomschy et al., 2000a, b). Using multiple amino acid sequence alignment approach, Gln27 of A. fumigatus phytase was identified as likely to be involved in substrate binding and/or release and, possibly, to be responsible for the considerably lower specific activity of A. fumigatus phytase as compared to that of A. terreus phytase, which has a ‘leu’ at an equivalent position. Site-directed mutagenesis of Gln27 of A. fumigatus phytase to leu, in fact increased the specific activity, and this and other mutations at position 27 yielded an interesting array of pH activity profiles and substrate specificities. A novel bacterial phytase from a B. amyloliquefaciens strain was crystallized   using   the   hanging-drop    vapour-diffusion method (Ha et al., 1999). High-quality single crystals of the enzyme in the absence of calcium ions were obtained using a precipitant solution containing 20% 2-methyl-2, 4-pentanediol and 0.1 M MES (pH 6.5). The crystals contain one monomer per asymmetric unit. Phytase has a a/b-domain similar to that of rat acid phosphatase and a-domain with a new fold (Kostrewa et al., 1997).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Directed evolution and protein engineering of phytases

 
Abstract
Introduction
Phytic acid
Phytases
An idea
Biochemical
Crystal
Directed
Multifarious
Conclusion
References
 

 

The natural enzymes are adapted in a living cell to perform a particular function, but in most cases, they are poorly suited for industrial applications. Protein engineering is a very active area of research for understanding the structure-function relationships of a particular protein (Lehman et al., 2000a, b, c; Tomschy et al., 2000a, b). In recent years, there has been a widespread enthusiasm for ‘directed evolution’ as a new tool to optimize the properties of an enzyme of interest (Dalboge and Borchert, 2000; Arnold, 2001). Mostly, enzymes are stabilized by the cumulative effects of small improvements at many locations within the protein molecule (Lehman et al., 2000a, b, c; Tomschy et al., 2000a, b; Coco et al., 2001). The engineering of proteins for improved thermostability is an exciting and challenging field because of its applicability for the industrial use of recombinant proteins (Lehman et al., 2000a, b, c; Tomschy et al., 2000a, b).

 

 

Rational design principles and directed evolution

 

The stability of a protein is determined by both local and long-range interactions between the residues (Tomschy et al., 2000a, b). The thermostability of an enzyme can be enhanced by multiple amino acid exchanges, each of which slightly increases the unfolding temperature of the protein. The rational approaches for thermostability engineering involve the comparison of the amino acid sequence of the protein of interest with a more thermostable, homologous counterpart, followed by replacement of selected amino acids (Tomschy et al., 2000a, b). Three-dimensional structure of the protein of interest could be helpful in this regard. The thermostabilization concepts include the introduction of additional disulfide bridges, improvements in the packing of the hydrophobic core, engineering of surface salt bridge networks or α-helix dipole interactions, changes in α-helix propensity and changes in entropy (Haney et al., 1999; Tomschy et al., 2000a, b). All these rational approaches have been used successfully in the engineering of phytases for improved catalytic activity. Site directed mutagenesis of amino acid residue 300 was resulted in a high phytase activity by A. niger NRRL 3135 at pH 3.0 to 5.0, while a single mutation (K300E) resulted

in an enhanced hydrolysis of phytic acid at pH 4.0 and 5.0. In this study, the basic amino acid residue lysine (K) was replaced by acidic residue. However, this replacement with another basic residue, or an uncharged but polar residue, did not significantly alter the activity at pH 4.0; but a replacement with basic residue arginine (R) lowered the activity over the pH range from 2.0 to 6.0 (Mullaney et al., 2002).

In A. fumigatus, a 3D structure of the native A. niger NRRL 3135 phytase was used to identify non-conserved amino acids that were not associated with increased catalytic activity (Tomschy et al., 2000a). Consequently, they changed the single amino acid residue (Q27), and this displayed a significant effect on specific activity, pH profile and substrate specificity. A. niger NRRL 3135 and A. niger T213 wild phytases displayed a 3-fold difference in specific activity, despite only 12 amino acid residues difference (Tomschy et al., 2000b). Out of these 12 amino acid residues, nine were distantly placed from active site, and therefore, are not responsible for catalytic activity. In the remaining 3 residues, R297Q mutation was found to fully account for this difference in catalytic activity, because out of the 3 single mutants (E89D, H292N and R297Q), 2 double mutants (E89D R297Q and H292N R297Q) and a triple mutant (E89D H292N R297Q) revealed a 3-fold increase in specific activity. This specific activity is close to the wild type. Molecular modeling revealed that R297Q may directly interact with the phosphate group of phytic acid. This presumed ionic interactions caused strong binding of the substrate and product indicating the product release as the rate-limiting step of the reaction, which is responsible for lower specific activity.

When expressed in A. niger, several fungal phytases were susceptible to proteases (Wyss et al., 1999b). N-terminal sequences of the fragments revealed that cleavage invariably occurred at exposed loops on the surfaces of the molecules. Site directed mutagenesis at the protease-sensitive sites of Aspergillus fumigatus (S151N and R151L/ R152N) and Emericella nidulans phytase (K186G and R187R) yielded mutants with reduced susceptibility to proteases, without affecting the specific activity. Based on E. coli phytase crystal structure, substitution of C200N in a mutant seems to eliminate the disulfide bond between the G helix and the GH loop in the α-domain of the protein which might be modulating the domain flexibility, and thereby the catalytic efficiency and thermostability of the enzyme (Rodriguez et al., 2000).

 

 

The consensus approach

 

The consensus approach is based on the hypothesis that at a given position in an amino acid sequence alignment of homologous proteins, the respective consensus  amino acid contributes more than average to the stability of the protein than the non-consensus amino acids (Lehman et al., 2000a, b, c). Consequently, substitution of non-consensus by consensus amino acids may be a possible approach for improving the thermostability of a protein. Each amino acid of a protein contributes towards its stability. The mutations responsible for thermostability of a protein with a small effect on the protein stability were combined to generate a consensus protein variant that showed enhanced thermostability (Lehman et al., 2000 a, b, c).

Lehman et al. (2000a) used a computer program to calculate an entire consensus sequence from 13 homologous amino acid sequences of wild-type phytases from mesophilic fungi. This phytase showed an identity of 58.3 to 80% with the parent phytases. The recombinant expression of a synthetic gene gave rise to a consensus phytase (consensus phytase-1) that was 15 to 26°C more thermostable and showing 15 to 22°C more denaturing temperature than the wild-type. The backbone of this consensus phytase was modified by Lehman et al. (2000b). They modified the catalytic property by replacing a part of the active site with the corresponding residue of A. niger NRRL3135 phytase, which displayed a pronounced difference in specific activity, substrate specificity and pH profile. This exchange of active site resulted in a decrease in denaturing temperature, but the consensus phytase was still more thermostable than its parents. Further addition of wild-type sequences in the alignment resulted in consensus phytase-10, which displayed a further 7.4°C increase in denaturing temperature. In another approach, the consensus approach was refined by including six more sequences that yielded consensus phytases-10 and -11 with an increase of 7.4°C in denaturing temperature. Site directed mutagenesis identified some residues showing their effect on protein thermostability. Nonetheless, the combination of these residues resulted in an increase in the denaturing temperature from 88.0 to 90.4°C.

 

 

   

Multifarious applications of phytases

 

Abstract
Introduction
Phytic acid
Phytases
An idea
Biochemical
Crystal
Directed
Multifarious
Conclusion
References

 

 

Amelioration of the nutritional status of foods and feeds

 

Phytases are useful in food and feed industries, preparation of myo-inositol phosphate intermediates, combating phosphorus pollution and in plant growth promotion (Idriss et al., 2002; Vohra and Satyanarayana, 2003; Vats and Banerjee, 2004; Greiner and Konietzny, 2006; Rao et al., 2009). The major food supplements in animal food are derived from plant sources such as cereals, legumes, soybean, etc. The presence of phytate in plant foodstuffs causes mineral deficiency due to the chelation of metal ions (De Boland et al., 1975).  The presence of phytic acid in rapeseed causes  Zn,  Mg  and Ca deficiency in chickens (Nwokolo and Bragg, 1977).

Canola meal contains 4 to 6% phytic acid, which reduces the nutrition value of the meal. The phytic acid has been shown to bind with multivalent cations, and hence, reduce their bioavailability. The addition of phytase to high phytate containing diets improves the absorption and utilization of phosphorus (Hughes and Soares, 1998). Dietary phytase also improves the nutritive value of canola protein concentrate and decreases phosphorus output in case of rainbow trout (Forster et al., 1999). Similar reports have been documented for different species like rainbow trout (Rodehutscord and Pfeiffer, 1995), channel catfish (Li and Robinson, 1997), African catfish (Van Weerd et al., 1999), common carp (Schafer et al., 1995) and Pangasius pangasius (Debnath et al., 2005). Robinson et al. (2002) reported that 250 units of phytase per kilogram of diet could effectively replace dicalcium phosphate supplement in the diet of channel catfish without affecting growth, feed efficiency or bone phosphorus deposition.

Phytic acid is well known to make complexes with various cations as well as with proteins (Wise, 1983). Phytase added to diets improves the bioavailability of copper and zinc in pigs (Adeola et al., 1995) and poultry (Yi et al., 1996). Microbial phytase also improves the apparent absorption of magnesium, zinc, copper and iron in pigs (Selle and Ravindran, 2007). Similar results have also been reported for fishes (Cao et al., 2007). Phytase addition increases the concentration of minerals like magnesium, phosphorus, calcium, manganese and zinc in plasma, bone and the whole body (Vielma et al., 2004). Yan and Reigh (2002) demonstrated that the phytase supplementation improved the retention of calcium, phosphorus and manganese by catfish fed with an all-plant protein diet. The phytase supplementation in the diets significantly improved the digestibility of minerals, total-P, phytate-P and gross energy (Cheng and Hardy, 2002). The experimental studies in animals and humans have shown that phytic acid rich diets can cause zinc deficiency. Phytic acid does not inhibit copper absorption, but has a modest inhibitory effect on manganese absorption (Lonnerdal, 2000).

The treatment of fish feed with phytase was found to improve protein digestibility and retention in fishes (Cheryan, 1980; Storebakken et al., 1998; Papatryphon et al., 1999; Boling et al., 2001; Cheng and Hardy, 2002; Usmani and Jafri, 2002; Vielma et al., 2004; Sajjadi and Carter, 2004; Debnath et al., 2005; Baruah et al., 2005; Ai et al., 2007; Altaff et al., 2008; Hassan et al., 2009). The inclusion of phytase to broilers diets increased the coefficient of phosphorus retention and reduced the presence of this element in poultry birds, thus, indicating a favorable environmental effect (Ahmad et al., 2000; Brenes et al., 2003; Juanpere et al., 2004; Murugesan et al., 2005; Vohra et al., 2006; Ahmadi et al., 2008; Pillai et al., 2009). Microbial phytases positively affected the pigs’ performance and their daily  gain,  and  further,  the  feed conversion ratios were ameliorated by organic acids (Jongbloed et al., 2000; Walz and Pallauf, 2002; Revy et al., 2005; Kim et al., 2005; Pomar et al., 2008; Akinmusire and Adeola, 2009; Hill et al., 2009).

 

 

The role of phytases in dephytinization and bread making

 

The presence of phytates in plant food stuffs (De Boland et al., 1975) is well known. Moulds commonly used in oriental food fermentation have been examined for their ability to produce phytase. Tempeh is a popular oriental fermented food made from soyabeans inoculated by moulds (Rhizopus oligosporus) in the koji process. The digestibility, vitamin contents and flavour of soyabean were improved by the mould fermentation (Fardiaz and Markakis, 1981). Dietary phytase is inactivated during cooking so the phytate digestion is very poor, thereby affecting mineral absorption. The addition of A. niger phytase to the flour containing wheat bran increased iron absorption in humans (Sandberg et al., 1996). The use of phytase was suggested for producing low phytin bread. Also, phytic acid has positive effects. It exerts an antineoplastic effect in animal models of both colon and breast carcinomas. The presence of undigested phytate in the colon may protect it against the development of colonic carcinoma (Iqbal et al. 1994).

By adding mould phytases during bread making, dough phytate could be almost completely eliminated. Caransa et al. (1988) reported that phytase supplementation could accelerate the process of steeping required in the wet milling of corn, thereby improving the properties of corn steep liquor. Supplementation of phytase from a thermophilic mould, S. thermophile, improved the bread quality with concomitant reduction in phytate (Singh and Satyanarayana, 2008c). Phytase released inorganic phosphate from calcium, magnesium and cobalt phytates (Singh and Satyanarayana, 2010).The effect of the supplementation of exogenous phytase to four different bread formulations on the bread quality was assessed by Haros et al. (2001a, b). The supplementation of bread with phytase shortened the fermentation period. There was a considerable increase in the specific bread volume, which is an improvement in the crumb texture and the width/height ratio of the bread slice (Knorr et al., 1981). The chapathi dough with reduced phytic acid levels was developed using a mutated strain of the yeast Candida versatilis and it resulted in 10 to 45% reduction in phytate levels (Bindu and Varadaraj, 2005). Wheat flour, sesame oil cake and soymilk were efficiently dephytinized by S. thermophile phytase with concomitant reduction in phytic acid content and liberating inorganic phosphate (Singh and Satyanarayana, 2006a; 2008a, 2008b). Similarly, the cell-bound phytase of P. anomala resulted in dephytinization of soymilk (Kaur and Satyanarayana, 2010).

 

 

Semisynthesis of peroxidase

 

Peroxidases are ubiquitous enzymes that catalyse a wide variety of selective oxidations with hydrogen peroxide as the primary oxidant (van de Velde et al., 2000). The active site of vanadium chloroperoxidase from Curvularia inaequalis closely resembled that of the acid phosphatases and the apoenzyme of vanadium chloroperoxidase exhibits phosphatase-like activity (Hemrika et al., 1997). The combination of phytase with vanadate produced an effective semi-synthetic peroxidase. The effect of pH on the vanadate phytase-catalysed oxidation of thioanisole revealed that the pH optimum coincided with that of phytase. Optimisation led to a maximum enatiomeric excess (ee) of 68% obtained in formate buffer at 4.0°C. The vanadium-incorporated phytase was stable for over three days with only a slight decrease in activity.

A cross-linked enzyme aggregate of 3-phytase was transformed into peroxidase by incorporation of vanadate (Correia et al., 2008). The cross-linked aggregate phytase showed similar efficiency and asymmetric induction as the free enzyme. Moreover, the cross-linked aggregate phytase can be reused at least three times without significant loss of activity. Some other acid, phosphatases and hydrolases were tested for peroxidase activity, when incorporated with vanadate ion. Phytases from Aspergillus ficuum, A. fumigatus and A. nidulans; sulfatase from Helix pomatia; and phospholipase D from cabbage, catalyzed the enantioselective oxygen transfer reactions when incorporated with vanadium. However, phytase from A. ficuum was unique in catalyzing the enantioselective sulfoxidation as compared to others.

 

 

Plant growth promotion

 

Phosphorus deficiency in soil is a major constraint for agricultural production worldwide. Large proportion of soil P exists in the organic form, of which phytic acid is the pre-dominant form. There are a large number of reports explaining the role of phytase in improving the growth of the plants and reducing the phosphorus pollution. A β-propeller phytase from Bacillus subtilis was constitutively expressed in tobacco and Arabidopsis, and it was shown to be secreted from their roots (Lung et al., 2005). In transgenic tobacco, phytase activities in leaf and root extracts were 7 to 9-fold higher than those in wild-type. A 4 to 6-fold higher extracellular phytase activity had been recorded in transgenic plants. In sterile liquid culture, using 1 mM sodium phytate as the sole P source, the transgenic tobacco lines accumulated 1.7 to 2.2 times more shoot biomass than the wild-type plants after 30 days of growth with concomitant increase (27 to 36%) in shoot P concentration. Similar observations have been recorded in the transgenic Arabidopsis, explaining the mobilization of soil phytate  into  inorganic  phosphate  for plant uptake (Lung et al., 2005). Yip et al. (2003) showed that the tobacco line transformed with a neutral Bacillus phytase exhibited phenotypic changes in flowering, seed development, and response to phosphate deficiency. The transgenic line showed an increase in number of flower and fruit, lesser seed IP6/IP5 ratio, and enhanced growth under phosphate-starvation conditions as compared to the wild type.

The transgenic Arabidopsis plants secreted phytase only from roots when grown on a medium under low phosphate conditions (Mudge et al., 2003). The growth rates and shoot P concentrations of plants were similar when grown on the medium containing phytate or phosphate as the P source. Phytase and phosphatases producing fungi were used as seed inoculants, to help attain higher P nutrition of plants in the soils containing high phytate phosphorus (Yadav and Tarafdar, 2003). The efficiency of different organic P compounds’ hydrolysis by different fungi indicated that the fungi have enough potential to exploit native organic phosphorus to benefit plant nutrition. Transgenic Arabidopsis plant expressing an extracellular phytase from Medicago truncatula led to significant improvement in organic phosphorus utilization and plant growth (Xiao et al., 2005). Using phytate as the sole source of phosphorus, dry weight of the transgenic Arabidopsis lines were 3.1 to 4.0-fold higher than the control plants and total phosphorus contents were 4.1- to 5.5-fold higher than the control, suggesting the great potential of heterologous expression of phytase gene for improving plant phosphorus acquisition and for phytoremediation. The growth and phosphorus nutrition of Arabidopsis thaliana plants supplied with phytate was improved significantly after the introduction of phytase gene from Aspergillus niger (Richardson et al., 2001). Li et al. (2007) showed that both wild type Bacillus mucilaginosus and transgenic (containing phytase gene) strains promoted the tobacco plant growth under greenhouse study and field experiments.

The plant growth promotory effect of an extracellular phytase of a thermophilic mould, Sporotrichum thermophile, has been reported recently (Singh and Satyanarayana, 2010). Both phytase, as well as the mould, promoted the growth of wheat seedlings. Effect of fungus and phytaseThe growth and inorganic phosphate content of the plants were better than the control.

Sodium phytate (5 mg plant-1) was adequate for liberating enough phosphorus for the growth of the seedlings. The plant growth, root/shoot length and inorganic phosphate content of test plants were better than the control plants. An enzyme dose of 20.0 U plant-1 was found to adequately liberate enough amount of inorganic phosphate required for supporting plant growth. The plant growth, root/shoot length and inorganic phosphate content of test plants were higher than the control (Singh and Satyanarayana, 2010).

The compost prepared by the combined action of native microflora   of   wheat   straw   along  with  S. thermophile promoted the growth of plants. The inorganic phosphate content of the wheat plants was also high as compared to those cultivated on the compost prepared either with only native microflora or S. thermophile. These approaches can be applied as a strategy for boosting the productivity in agriculture and horticulture.

 

 

Miscelaneous applications

 

Preparation of myo-inositol phosphates

 

There is a continuous demand of inositol phosphates and phospholipids, which play an important role in cell signalling pathways (Billington, 1993). Enzymic hydrolysis of phytic acid using S. cerevisiae resulted in the production of D-myo-inositol 1,2,6-triphosphate, D-myo-inositol 1,2,5-triphosphate, L-myo-inositol 1,3,4-triphosphate and myo-inositol 1,2,3-triphosphate (Siren, 1986). Greiner and Konietzny (1996) prepared inositol 1,2,3,4,5-pentakisphosphate, inositol 2,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate, inositol 2,4,5-triphosphate and inositol 2,5-biphosphate using immobilized phytase from E. coli. Inositol phosphate derivatives can be used as enzyme stabilizers (Siren, 1986), enzyme substrates for metabolic investigation, as enzyme inhibitors and therefore potential drugs, and as chiral building blocks.

 

 

Pulp and paper industry

 

It has been observed that the removal of plant phytic acid could be important in the pulp and paper industry (Liu et al., 1998). A phytase with activity at elevated temperatures could have the potential as a biological agent to hydrolyse phytic acid during pulp and paper processing. This process will not produce any carcinogenic and toxic byproducts. Therefore, the use of phytases in pulp and paper processing could be ecofriendly and would help in the development of cleaner technologies (Liu et al., 1998).

 

 

Combating environmental phosphorus pollution

 

Phosphorus is an essential ingredient in animal and plant production; however, too much or too little P can be a problem both for animal production and the environment. Researchers all over the world are finding ways for poultry to better utilize P, thus increasing productive efficiency and protecting the environment. The ruminants sustain the microflora that enzymatically releases inorganic phosphorus from phytic acid, though, monogastrics such as humans, chickens and pigs produce little or no phytase in the intestine. Hence, the phytic acid phosphorus is unavailable and the phytic acid is excreted in their feaces (Mullaney et al.,  2000).  Phytic acid present in the manure of these animals is enzymatically cleaved by soil and water-borne microorganisms. The phosphorus thus released is transported into the water bodies causing eutrophication. This results in oxygen depletion due to excessive algal growth. Pretreatment of animal feed with phytases will increase the availability of inorganic phosphorus, thereby improving the nutritional status of food and also help in combating phosphorus pollution. Phytases are very well known to reduce pollution caused by excess of phosphorus accumulation in soil and water (Nahm, 2002). The excretion of phosphorus can be reduced by 30%, via replacing feed phosphate with phytase and by equally calculated digestible P content. The addition of phytase to the feed of piglets gives positive results in some experiments such as a significant increase in growth rate and feed intake and a significantly better feed conversion ratio in comparison with the conventional feed. The supplementation of phytase in corn and soybean meal diets was additive, significantly improving P digestibility and dramatically decreasing P excretion to reduce the potential impacts of P from pig manure on the environment (Hill et al., 2009).

Microbial phytase supplementation in the diet of fish can overcome this problem. It makes the chelated phosphorus available to fish, and hence, there is less faecal excretion, thereby reducing environmental pollution. The environmental benefits of using this enzyme in fish feed are thus listed:

 

1. Reduced requirement of the mineral supplements, thereby reducing chances of excess inorganic phosphorus getting into the aquatic system.

2. Reduced organic phosphorus, that is, phytic acid outputs.

 

Use of phytase in feeds reduces or sometimes eliminates the necessity of mineral supplementation, which also decreases the cost of feeds. Although phytase was first used for environmental reasons, it is now realized that there are a range of other nutritional and health benefits from using these enzymes.

 

 

   

Conclusions and future perpectives

 
Abstract
Introduction
Phytic acid
Phytases
An idea
Biochemical
Crystal
Directed
Multifarious
Conclusion
References
 

 

Besides effectively tackling phosphorus pollution in the areas of intensive livestock rearing, phytases have considerable potential in commercial applications. The applications of phytases in improving human health and in synthesis of lower inositol phosphates have increasingly attracted attention. A significant progress has been made in phytase research during the last few decades. The phytases, which exhibit desirable activity profile over a broad pH range, excellent thermal stability, and broad substrate specificity, are more promising for commercial    exploitation. Modern  day technologies (molecular biology and genetics) could be utilized for the development of staple foods with higher and improved bioavailability of the minerals and proteins. Genetic engineering techniques could be employed for the generation of consensus phytases with improved and desirable properties for applications in food and feed industries (Lehman et al., 2000a, b, c). Adding phytase to the animal diets not only improves the bioavailability of proteins and minerals, but also aids in combating environmental phosphorus pollution in the areas of intensive live stock management.

   Transgenic plants of corn, rice, barley and soybean with low phytic acid have been generated; and this could be a novel approach for reducing micronutrient malnutrition and animal waste phosphorus. Further research efforts are needed to understand the molecular biology and genetics of phytic acid accumulation during seed development and feasibility and effectiveness of employing this approach at the community level (Mendoza, 2002). The transgenic plants harboring the microbial phytase genes could also be used to improve soil fertilization and nutrient availability to plants. With the collaborative efforts of phytase scientists from different fields, it would be possible to design and develop an ideal phytase for animal nutrition, human health and environmental protection.

 

 

 

 

 

   

References

 

Abstract
Introduction
Phytic acid
Phytases
An idea
Biochemical
Crystal
Directed
Multifarious
Conclusion
References

 

 

Adeola O, Lawrence BV, Sutton AL, Cline TR (1995). Phytase-induced changes in mineral utilization in zinc-supplemented diets for pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 73: 3384-3391.

 

Ahmad T, Rasool S, Sarwar, Haq A, Hasan Z (2000). Effect of microbial phytase produced from a fungus Aspergillus niger on bioavailability of phosphorus and calcium in broiler chickens. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 83: 103-114.

 

Ahmadi A, Tabatabaei MM, Aliarabi H, Saki AA, Siyar SA (2008). Performance and egg quality of laying hens affected by different sources of phytase. Pak. J. Biol. Sci.,  11: 2286-2288.

 

Ai Q, Mai K, Zhang W, Xu W, Tan B, Zhang C, Li H (2007). Effects of exogenous enzymes (phytase, non-starch polysaccharide enzyme) in diets on growth, feed utilization, nitrogen and phosphorus excretion of japanese seabass, Lateolabrax japonicus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol., 147: 502-508.

 

Akinmusire AS, Adeola O (2009). True digestibility of phosphorus in canola and soybean meals for growing pigs: Influence of microbial phytase. J. Anim. Sci., 87: 977-983.

 

Altaff K, Hassan S, Satyanarayana T (2008). Use of phytase in plant based feed for aquaculture industry: Cost effective and eco-friendly practice: Present scenario and future perspectives. J. Aqua. Biol., 23: 185-193.

 

Angelis MD, Gallo G, Corbo MR, McSweeney PLH, Faccia M, Giovine M, Gobbetti M (2003). Phytase activity in sourdough lactic acid bacteria: purification and characterization of a phytase from Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis CB1. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 87: 259- 270

 

Arnold FH (2001). Evolutionary protein design. Adv. Protein Chem., 55: 1-438.

 

Asada K, Tanaka K, Kasai Z (1969). Formation of phytic acid in cereal grains. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 165: 801-814.

 

Barrientos L, Scott JJ, Murthy PP (1994). Specificity of hydrolysis of phytic acid by alkaline phytase from lily pollen. Plant Physiol., 106: 1489-1495.

 

Baruah KP, Sahu AK, Jain NP, Mukherjee KK, Debnath SC (2005). Dietary protein level, microbial phytase, citric acid and their interactions on bone mineralization of Labeo rohita (Hamilton) juveniles. Aquacult. Res., 36: 803-812.

 

Berka RM, Rey MW, Brown KM, Byun T, Klotz AV (1998). Molecular characterization and expression of a phytase gene from the thermophilic fungus Thermomyces lanuginosus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 64: 4423-4427.

 

Billington WD (1993). Species diversity in the immunogenetic relationship between mother and fetus: is trophoblast insusceptibility to immunological destruction the only essential common feature for the maintenance of allogeneic pregnancy? Exp. Clin. Immunogenet., 10(2): 73-84.

 

Bindu S, Varadaraj MC (2005) Process for the preparation of Chapathi dough with reduced phytic acid level. United States Patent Application #20050048165 dated 3/3/05.

 

Bohm K, Herter T, Müller JJ, Borriss R, Heinemann U (2010). Crystal structure of Klebsiella sp. ASR1 phytase suggests substrate binding to a preformed active site that meets the requirements of a plant rhizosphere enzyme. FEBS J. 277(5): 1284-1296.

 

Boling SD, Douglas MW, Johnson ML, Wang X, Parsons CM, Koelkebeck KW, Zimmerman RA (2001). The effects of dietry available phosphorus levels and phytase performance of young and older laying hens. Poult. Sci., 79: 224-230.

 

Brenes A, Viveros A, Arija I, Centeno C, Pizarro M, Bravo C (2003). The effect of citric acid and microbial phytase on mineral utilization in broiler chicks. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 110: 201-219.

 

Cao L, Wang W, Yang C, Yang Y, Diana J, Yakupitiyage A, Luo Z, Li D (2007). Application of microbial phytase in fish feed. Enz. Microb. Technol., 40: 497-507.

 

Caransa A, Simell M, Lehmussari M, Vaara M, Vaara T (1988). A novel enzyme application in corn wet milling. Starch 40: 409-411.

 

Casey A and Walsh G (2003). Purification and characterization of extracellular phytase from Aspergillus niger ATCC 9142. Bioresour. Technol., 86(2): 183-188.

 

Casey A, Walsh G (2004). Identification and characterization of a phytase of potential commercial interest. J. Biotechnol., 110(3): 313-322.

 

Chadha BS, Gulati H, Minhas M, Saini HS, Singh N (2004). Phytase production by the thermophilic fungus Rhizomucor pusillus. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 20: 105-109.

 

Cheng ZJ, Hardy RW (2002). Effect of microbial phytase on apparent nutrient digestibility of barley, canola meal, wheat and wheat middlings, measured in vivo using rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquacult. Nutr.,  8: 271-277.

 

Cheryan M (1980). Phytic acid interactions in food systems. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 13: 297-335.

 

Cho JS, Lee CW, Kang SH, Lee JC, Bok JD, Moon YS, Lee HG, Kim SC, Choi YJ (2003). Purification and characterization of a phytase from Pseudomonas syringae MOK1. Curr. Microbiol. 47(4): 290-294.

 

Chu HM, Guo RT, Lin TW, Chou CC, Shr HL, Lai HL, Tang TY, Cheng KJ, Selinger BL, Wang AH (2004). Structures of Selenomonas ruminantium phytase in complex with persulfated phytate: Dsp phytase fold and mechanism for sequential substrate hydrolysis. Structure (Camb), 12: 2015-2024.

 

Coco WM, Levinson WE, Crist MJ, Hektor HJ, Darzins A, Pienkos PT, Charles HS, Monticello DJ (2001). DNA shuffling method for generating highly recombined genes and evolved enzymes. Nat. Biotechnol., 19: 354-359.

 

Correia I, Aksu S, Adao P, Pessoa JC, Sheldon RA, Arends IWCE (2008). Vanadate substituted phytase: Immobilization, structural characterization and performance for sulfoxidations. J. Inorg. Biochem., 102: 318-329

 

Dalboge H, Borchert TV (2000). Protein engineering of enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1543: 203-455

.

De Boland AR, Garner GB, O’Dell BL (1975). Identification and properties of ‘phytate’ in cereal grains and oilseed products. J. Agri. Food Chem., 23: 1186-1189.

 

Debnath D, Pal AK, Sahu NP, Jain KK, Yengkokpam S, Mukherjee SC (2005). Effect of dietary microbial phytase supplementation on growth and nutrient digestibility of Pangasius pangasius (Hamilton) fingerlings. Aquacult. Res., 36: 180-187.

 

Fardiaz D, Markakis P (1981). Degradation of phytic acid in oncom (fermented peanut press cake). J. Food Sci., 46: 523-525.

 

Forster I, Higgs DA, Dosanjh BS, Rowshandeli M, Parr J (1999). Potential for dietary phytase to improve the nutritive value of canola protein concentrate and decrease phosphorus output in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) held in 11°C fresh water. Aquacult. Nutr. 179: 109-125.

 

Fu S, Sun J, Qian L, Li Z (2008). Bacillus phytases: present scenario and future perspectives. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 151(1): 1-8.

 

Golovan SP, Hayes MA, Phillips JP, Forsberg CW (2001). Transgenic mice expressing bacterial phytase as a model for phosphorus pollution control. Nat. Biotechnol. 19:  429-433.

 

Graf E (1986). Phytic acid-chemistry and application. Minneapolis, The Pillsbury Co Pilatus Press; p. 42-44.

 

Greaves MP, Anderson G and Webley DM (1967). The hydrolysis of inositol phosphates by Aerobacter aerogenes.  Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 132: 412‑418.

 

Greaves MP, Anderson G, Webley DM (1967). The hydrolysis of inositol phosphates by Aerobacter aerogenes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 132: 412-418.

 

Greiner R, Konietzny U (1996). Construction of a bioreactor to produce special breakdown products of phytate. J. Biotechnol., 48: 153-159.

 

Greiner R, Konietzny U (2006). Phytase for food application. Food Technol. Biotechnol., 44: 125-140.

 

Greiner R, Konitzny U, Jany KD (1993). Purification and characterization of two phytases from Escherchia coli. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 303: 107-113.

 

Ha NC, Kim YO, Oh TK, Oh BH (1999). Preliminary x-ray crystallographic analysis of a novel phytase from a Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 55: 691-693.

 

Ha NC, Oh BC, Shin S, Kim HJ, Oh TK, Kim YO, Choi KY, Oh BH (2000). Crystal structures of a novel, thermostable phytase in partially and fully calcium-loaded states. Nat. Struct. Biol., 7: 147-153.

 

Han YM, Yang F, Zhou AG, Miller ER, Ku PK, Hogberg MG, Lei XG (1997). Supplemental phytases of microbial and cereal sources improve dietary phytate phosphorus utilization by pigs from weaning through finishing. J. Anim. Sci., 75: 1017-1025.

 

Haney PJ, Badger JH, Buldak GL, Reich CI, Woese CR, Olsen GJ (1999). Thermal adaptation analyzed by comparison of protein sequences from mesophilic and extremely thermophilic Methanococcus species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96: 3578-3583.

 

Hara A, Ebina S, Kondo A, Funagua T (1985). A new type of phytase from Typha latifolia L. Agric. Biol. Chem., 49: 3539-3544.

 

Harland BF, Morris ER (1995). Phytate: A good or a bad food component. Nutr. Res. 15: 733-754.

 

Haros M, Rosell CM, Benedito C (2001a). Fungal phytase as a potential breadmaking additive. Europ. Food Res. Technol., 213 (4-5): 317-322.

 

Haros M, Rosell CM, Benedito C (2001b). Use of fungal phytase to improve breadmaking performance of whole wheat bread. J. Agric. Food Chem., 49(11): 5450-5454.

 

Hassan S, Altaff K, Satyanarayana T (2009). Use of soybean meal supplemented with cell bound phytase for replacement of fish meal in the diet of juvenile milkfish, Chanos chanos. Pakistan J. Nutr., 8: 341-344.

 

Hegeman CE, Grabau EA (2001). A novel phytase with sequence similarity to purple acid phosphatases is expressed in cotyledons of germinating soybean seedlings. Plant Physiol., 126: 1598-1608.

 

Hemrika W, Renirie R, Dekker HL, Barnett P, Wever R (1997). From phosphatases to vanadium peroxidases: A similar architecture of the active site. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 2145-2149.

 

Hill BE, Sutton AL, Richert BT (2009). Effects of low-phytic acid corn, low-phytic acid soybean meal, and phytase on nutrient digestibility and excretion in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 87: 1518-1527.

 

Howson SJ, Davis RP (1983). Production of phytate hydrolyzing enzymes by some fungi. Enz. Microb. Technol., 5: 377-382.

 

Hubel F, Beck E (1996). Maize root phytase (purification, characterization, and localization of enzyme activity and its putative  substrate). Plant Physiol., 112: 1429-1436.

 

Hughes KP, Soares JJH (1998). Efficacy of phytase on phosphate utilization in practical diets fed to striped bass, morone sexatilis. Aquacult. Nutr., 4: 133-140.

 

Idriss EE, Makarewicz O, Farouk A, Rosner K, Greiner R, Bochow H, Richter T, Borriss R (2002). Extracellular phytase activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB45 contributes to its plant-growth-promoting effect. Microbiology, 148 (Pt 7): 2097-2109.

 

Iqbal TH, Lewis KO, Cooper BT (1994). Phytase activity in the human and rat small intestine. Gut, 35: 1233-1236.

 

Irving GCJ, Cosgrove DJ (1971). Inositol phosphate phosphatases of microbiological origin. Some properties of a partially purified bacterial (Pseudomonas sp.) phytase. Aust. J. Biol. Sci., 24: 547-557.

 

Jareonkitmongkol S, Ohya M, Watanbe R, Takagi H, Nakamori S (1997). Partial purification of phytase from a soil isolate bacterium, Klebsiella oxytoca MO-3. J. Ferm. Bioeng., 83: 393-394.

 

Jongbloed AW, Mroz Z, Kemme PA (1992). The effect of supplementary Aspergillus niger phytase in diets for pigs on concentration and apparent digestibility of dry matter, total phosphorus, and phytic acid in different sections of the alimentary tract. J. Anim. Sci., 70: 1159-1168.

 

Jongbloed AW, Mroz Z, van der Weij-Jongbloed R, Kemme PA (2000). The effects of microbial phytase, organic acids and their interaction in diets for growing pigs. Livestock Prod. Sci., 67: 113-122.

 

Juanpere J, Pérez-Vendrell AM, Brufau J (2004). Effect of microbial phytase on broilers fed barley-based diets in the presence or not of endogenous phytase. J. Animal Feed Sci. Technol., 115: 265-279.

 

Kaur P, Singh B, Böer E, Straube N, Piontek M, Satyanarayana T, Kunze G (2010).  Pphy--a cell-bound phytase from the yeast Pichia anomala: molecular cloning of the gene PPHY and characterization of the recombinant enzyme. J. Biotechnol.,  149(1-2): 8-15.

 

Kaur P, Kunze G, Satyanarayana T (2007). Yeast phytases: Present scenario and future perspectives. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 27: 93-109.

 

Kaur P, Satyanarayana T (2010). Improvement in cell-bound phytase activity of Pichia anomala by permeabilization and applicability of permeabilized cells in soymilk dephytinization. J. Appl. Microbiol. (In press).

 

Kerovuo J, Lauraeus M, Nurminen P, Kalkkinen N,  Apajalahti J (1998). Isolation, characterization, molecular gene cloning and sequencing of a novel phytase from Bacillus subtilis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 64: 2079-2085.

 

Kim JC, Simmins PH, Mullan BP, Pluske JR (2005). The effect of wheat phosphorus content and supplemental enzymes on digestibility and growth performance of weaner pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 118: 139-152.

 

Kim YO, Kim HK, Bae KS, Yu JH, Oh TK (1998). Purification and properties of thermostable phytase from Bacillus sp. DS11. Enz. Microb. Technol., 22: 2-7.

 

Knorr D, Watkins TR, Carlson BL (1981). Enzymatic reduction of phytate in whole wheat breads. J. Food Sci., 46: 1866-1869.

 

Kostrewa A, Grueninger-Leitch F, D’Arcy A, Broger C, Mitchell D, vanLoon APGM (1997). Crystal structure of phytase from Aspergillus ficuum at 2.5 A resolution. Nat. Struct. Biol., 4: 185-190.

 

Laboure AM, Gagnon J, Lescure AM (1993). Purification and characterization of a phytase (myo-inositol-hexakisphosphate phosphohydrolase) accumulated in maize (Zea mays) seedlings during germination. Biochem. J.,  295 ( Pt 2): 413-419.

 

Lassen SF, Breinholt J, Ostergaard PR, Brugger R, Bischoff A, Wyss M, Fuglsang CC (2001). Expression, gene cloning and characterization of five novel phytases from four basidomycete fungi: Peniophora lycii, Agrocybe pediades, Ceriporia sp., and Trametes pubescens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 67: 4701-4707.

 

Lehman M, Kostrewa D, Wyss M, Brugger R, D'Arcy A, Pasamontes L,  van Loon APGM (2000b). From DNA sequence to improved functionality: Using protein sequence comparisons to rapidly design a thermostable consensus phytase. Protein Eng., 13: 49-57.

 

Lehman M, Lopez-Ulibarri R, Loch C, Viarouge C, Wyss M, van Loon APGM (2000a). Exchanging the active site between phytases for altering the functional properties of the enzyme. Protein Sci., 9: 1866-1872.

 

Lehmann M, Pasamontes L, Lassen SF, Wyss M (2000c). The consensus concept for thermostability engineering of proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1543: 408-415.

 

Lei XG, Ku PK, Miller ER, Yokoyama MT (1993a). Supplementing corn-soybean meal diets with microbial phytase linearly improves phytate phosphorus utilization by weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 71: 3359-3367.

 

Lei XG, Ku PK, Miller ER, Yokoyama MT, Ullrey DE (1993b). Supplementing corn-soybean meal diets with microbial phytase maximizes phytate phosphorus utilization by weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 71: 3368-3375.

 

Lei XG, Stahl CH (2001). Biotechnological development of effective phytases for mineral nutrition and environmental protection. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 57: 474-481.

 

Li M, Osaki M, Honma M, Tadano T (1997). Purification and characterization of phytase induced in tomato roots under phosphorus-deficient conditions. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 43: 179-190.

 

Li MH, Robinson EH (1997). Microbial phytase can replace inorganic phosphorus supplements in channel catfish lactalurus punctatus. J. World Aquacult. Soc. 28: 402-406.

 

Li X, Wu Z, Li W, Yan R, Li L, Li J, Li Y, Li M (2007). Growth promoting effect of a transgenic Bacillus mucilaginosus on tobacco planting. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 74(5): 1120-1125.

 

Lim D, Golovan S, Forsberg CW, Jia Z (2000). Crystal structures of Escherichia coli phytase and its complex with phytate. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7: 108-113.

 

Lim D, Jia Z (2002). Heavy metal-mediated crystallization of Escherichia coli phytase and analysis of bridging interactions. Protein Pept. Lett., 9: 359-365.

 

Liu BL, Jong CH Tzeng YM (1998). Effect of immobilization on pH and thermal stability of Aspergillus ficuum phytase. Enz. Microb. Technol., 25: 517-521.

 

Lonnerdal B (2000). Dietary factors influencing zinc absorption. J. Nutr., 130(5S Suppl): 1378S-1383S.

 

Lung SC, Chan WL, Yip W, Wang L, Yeung EC, Lim BL (2005). Secretion of beta-propeller phytase from tobacco and Arabidopsis roots enhances phosphorus utilization. Plant Sci. 169(2): 341-349.

 

Maga JA (1982). Phytate: Its chemistry, occurrence, food interactions, nutritional significance, and methods of analysis. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 16: 1-48.

 

Mendoza C (2002). Effect of genetically modified low phytic acid plants on mineral absorption. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 37: 759-767.

 

Mitchell DB, Vogel K, Weimann BJ, Pasamontes L, van Loon APGM (1997). The phytase subfamily of histidine acid phosphatase: Isolation of genes for two novel phytases from fungi Aspergillus terreus and Myceliophthora thermophila. Microbiology, 143: 245-252.

 

Mudge SR, Frank WS, Richardson AE (2003). Root-specific and phosphate-regulated expression of phytase under the control of a phosphate transporter promoter enables Arabidopsis to grow on phytate as a sole P source. Plant Sci., 165(4): 871-878.

 

Mullaney EJ, Daly CB, Kim T, Porres JM, Lei XG, Sethumadhavan K, Ullah AHJ (2002). Site-directed mutagenesis of Aspergillus niger NRRL 3135 phytase at residue 300 to enhance catalysis at pH 4.0. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 297: 1016-1020.

 

Mullaney EJ, Daly CB, Ullah AH (2000). Advances in phytase research. Adv. Appl. Microbiol.,  47: 157-199.

 

Mullaney EJ, Ullah AH (2003). The term phytase comprises several different classes of enzymes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 312: 179-184.

 

Murugesan GS, Sathishkumar M, Swaminathan K (2005). Supplementation of waste tea fungal biomass as a dietary ingredient for broiler chicks. Bioresour. Technol., 96:1443-1448.

 

Nahm KH (2002). Efficient feed nutrient utilization to reduce pollutants in poultry and swine manure. Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Technol.,  32: 1-16.

 

Nakamura Y, Fukuhara H, Sano K (2000). Secreted phytase activities of yeasts. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 64: 841-844.

 

Nampoothiri KM, Tomes GJ, Roopesh K, Szakacs G, Nagy V, Soccol CR, Pandey A (2004) Thermostable phytase production by Thermoascus aurantiacus in submerged fermentation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 118: 205-214.

 

Nayini NR, Markakis P (1984). The phytase of yeast. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol., 17: 24-26.

 

NagashimaT, Tange T,  Anazawa H (1999). Dephosphorylation of phytate by using Aspergillus niger phytase with a high affinity for phytate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65(10): 4682-4684.

 

Nwokolo EN, Bragg DB (1977). Influence of phytic acid and crude fiber on the availability of minerals from four protein supplements in growing chicks. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 57: 475-480.

 

Pandey A, Szakacs G, Soccol CR, Rodriguez-Leon JA, Soccol VT (2001). Production, purification and properties of microbial phytases. Bioresour. Technol., 77: 203-214.

 

Papatryphon E, Howell RA, Soares JJH (1999). Growth and mineral absorption by a striped bass morone sexatilis fed a plant feedstuff based diet supplemented with phytase. J. World Aquacult. Soc., 30: 161-173.

 

Pasamontes L, Haiker M, Henriquez-Huecas M, Mitchell DB, van Loon APGM (1997a). Cloning of the phytases from Emericella nidulans and the thermophilic fungus Talaromyces thermophilus. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1353: 217-223.

 

Pasamontes L, Haiker M, Wyss M, Tessier M, van Loon APGM (1997b). Gene cloning, purification, and characterization of a heat-stable phytase from the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 63: 1696-1700.

 

Pillai UP, Manoharan V, Lisle A, Li X, Bryden W (2009). Phytase supplemented poultry diets affect soluble phosphorus and nitrogen in manure and manure-amended soil. J. Environ. Qual., 38: 1700-1708.

 

Pomar C, Gagne F, Matte JJ, Barnett G, Jondreville C (2008). The effect of microbial phytase on true and apparent ileal amino acid digestibilities in growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci.,  86: 1598-1608.

 

Powar VK, Jagannathan V (1982). Purification and properties of phytate-specific phosphatase from Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol., 151: 1102-1108.

 

Quan CS, Difan S, Zhang LH, Wang YJ,  Ohta Y (2001). Purification and properties of a phytase from Candida krusei WZ-001. J. Biosci. Bioeng., 94(5): 419-425.

 

Radcliffe JS, Zhang Z, Kornegay ET (1998). The effects of microbial phytase, citric acid, and their interaction in a corn-soybean meal-based diet for weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 76: 1880-1886.

 

Ramachandaran S, Krishnan R, Nampoothiri KM, Szackacs G and Pandey A (2005). Mixed substrate fermentation for the production of phytase by Rhizopus spp. using oil cakes as substrates. Process Biochem., 40(5): 1749-1754.

 

Ramseyer L, Garling D, Hill G, Link J (1999). Effect of dietary zinc supplementation and phytase pre- treatment of soybean meal or corn gluten meal on growth, zinc status and zinc-related metabolism in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Fish Physiol. Biochem.,  20: 251-261.

 

Rao DE, Rao KV, Reddy TP, Reddy VD (2009). Molecular characterization, physicochemical properties, known and potential applications of phytases: An overview. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 29(2): 182-198.

 

Reddy NR, Sathe SK, Salunkhe DK (1982). Phytases in legumes and cereals. Adv. Food Res., 82: 1-92

 

Revy PS, Jondreville C, Dourmad JY, Nys Y (2005). Assessment of dietary zinc requirement of weaned piglets fed diets with or without microbial phytase. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr.,  90: 50-59.

 

Richardson AE, Hadobas PA, Hayes JE (2001). Extracellular secretion of Aspergillus phytase from Arabidopsis roots enables plants to obtain phosphorous from phytate. Plant J., 25: 641-649.

 

Riley WW, Austic RE (1984). Influence of dietary electrolytes on digestive tract pH and acid-base status of chicks. Poult. Sci., 63: 2247-2251.

 

Robinson EH, Li MH, Manning BB (2002). Influence of dietary calcium, phosphorus, zinc and sodium phytate level on cataract incidence, growth and histopathology in juvenile chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha).Comparison of microbial phytase and dicalcium phosphate for growth and bone mineralization of pond-raised channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus. J. Appl. Aquacult., 12: 81-88.

 

Rodehutscord M, Pfeffer E (1995). Effects of supplemental microbial phytase on phosphorus digestibility and utilization in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Water Sci. Technol.,  31: 143-147.

 

Rodriguez E, Mullaney EJ, Lei XG (2000). Expression of the Aspergillus fumigatus phytase gene in Pichia pastoris and characterization of the recombinant enzyme. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 268: 373-378.

 

Roopesh K, Ramachandran S, Nampoothiri KM, Szakacs G, Pandey A (2006). Comparison of phytase production on wheat bran and oilcakes in solid-state fermentation by Mucor racemosus. Bioresour. Technol., 97(3): 506-511.

 

Sajjadi M, Carter CG (2004). Effect of phytic acid and phytase on feed intake, growth, digestibility and trypsin activity in atlantic salmon (Salmo salar, L.) Aquacult. Nutr., 10: 135-142.

 

Sandberg AS, Hulthen LR, Turk M (1996). Dietary Aspergillus niger phytase increases iron absorption in humans. J. Nutr.,  126: 476-480.

 

Sano L, Fukuhara H, Nakamura Y (1999). Phytase of the yeast Arxula adeninivorans. Biotechnol. Lett., 21: 33-38.

 

Satyanarayana T, Vohra A(2003). A synergistic feed composition to enhance phosphorous availability, assimilation and retention in non-ruminants. Indian Patent No. 197593

 

Schafer A, Koppe WM, Meyer-Burgdorff KH, Gunther KD (1995). Effects of a microbial phytase on the utilization of native phosphorus by carp in a diet based on soybean meal. Water Sci. Technol.,  31: 149-155.

 

Scott JJ, Loewus FA (1986). A calcium activated phytase from pollen of Lilium longiflorum. Plant Physiol., 82: 333-335.

 

Segueilha L, Lambrechts C, Boze H, Moulin G, Galzy P (1992). Purification and properties of phytase from Schwanniomyces castellii. J. Ferment. Bioeng., 74: 7-11.

 

Selle PH, Ravindran R (2007). Microbial phytase in piggery nutrition. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 135: 1-41.

 

Selle PH, Ravindran R (2008). Microbial phytase in poultry nutrition. Livestock Sci., 113: 99-122.

 

Sheppy C (2001). The current feed enzyme market and likely trends. In MR Bedford (ed) Enzymes in farm animal nutrition. CABI, Publishing, Oxon, U.K. pp.1-10.

 

Shieh TR, Ware JH (1968). Survey of microorganism for the production of extracellular phytase. Appl. Microbiol., 16: 1348-1351.

 

Shimizu M (1992). Purification and characterization of phytase from Bacillus subtilis (natto) N-77. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 56: 1266-1269.

 

Shimizu M (1993). Purification and characterization of phytase and acid phosphatase produced by Aspergillus oryzae K1. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 57: 1364-1365.

 

Shin S, Ha NC, Oh BC, Oh TK, Oh BH (2001). Enzyme mechanism and catalytic property of b-propeller phytase. Structure, 9: 851-858.

 

Singh B, Kaur, P, Satyanarayana, T (2006). Fungal phytases for improving the nutritional status of foods and combating environmental phosphorus pollution. In AK Chauhan, and A Verma (eds.) Microbes: Health and Environment. IK International Publishers, New Delhi, pp. 289-326.

 

Singh B, Satyanarayana T (2006a). A marked enhancement in phytase production by a thermophilic mould Sporotrichum thermophile using statistical designs in a cost-effective cane molasses medium. J. Appl. Microbiol.  101: 344-352.

 

Singh B, Satyanarayana T (2006b). Phytase production by thermophilic mold Sporotrichum thermophile in solid-state fermentation and its application in dephytinization of sesame oil cake. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 133: 239-250.

 

Singh B, Satyanarayana T (2008a). Improved phytase production by a thermophilic mould Sporotrichum thermophile in submerged fermentation due to statistical optimization. Bioresour. Technol., 99: 824-830.

 

Singh B, Satyanarayana T (2008b). Phytase production by a thermophilic mould Sporotrichum thermophile in solid state fermentation and its potential applications. Bioresour. Technol., 99: 2824-2830.

 

Singh B, Satyanarayana T (2008c). Phytase production by Sporotrichum thermophile in a cost-effective cane molasses medium in submerged fermentation and its application in bread. J. Appl. Microbiol., 105: 1858-1865.

 

Singh B, Satyanarayana T (2009). Characterization of a HAP-phytase from a thermophilic mould Sporotrichum thermophile. Bioresour. Technol., 100: 2046-2051.

 

Singh B, Satyanarayana T (2010). Plant growth promotion by an extracellular HAP-phytase of a thermophilic mold Sporotrichum thermophile. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 160(5): 1267-1276.

 

Siren M (1986). New myo-inositol triphosphoric acid isomer. Pat SW 052950.

 

Sreeramulu G, Srinivasa DS, Nand K, Joseph R (1996). Lactobacillus amylovorus as a phytase producer in submerged culture. Lett Appl Microbiol., 23: 385-388.

 

Storebakken T, Shearer KD, Roem AJ (1998). Availability of protein, phosphorus and other elements in fish meal, soy-protein concentrate and phytase-treated soy-protein-concentrate-based diets to atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Aquacult. Nutr., 161: 365-379.

 

Sunita K, Kim YO, Lee JK, Oh TK (2000). Statistical optimization of seed and induction conditions to enhance phytase production by recombinant Escherichia coli. Biochem. Eng. J., 5: 51-56.

 

Sutardi M,  Buckle KA (1988). Characterization of extra and intracellular phytase from Rhizopus oligosporus used in tempeh production. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 6: 67-69.

 

Tambe SM, Kakli SG, Kelkar SM, Parekh LJ (1994). Two distinct molecular forms of phytase from Klebsiella aerogenes; evidence for unusually small active enzyme peptide. J. Ferment. Bioeng., 77: 23-27.

 

Tomschy A, Tessier M, Wyss M, Brugger R, Broger C, Schnoebelen L (2000a). Optimization of the catalytic properties of Aspergillus fumigatus phytase based on the three-dimensional structure. Protein Sci.,  9: 1304-1311.

 

Tomschy A, Wyss M, Kostrewa D, Vogel K, Tessier M, Hofer S et al. (2000b). Active site residue 297 of Aspergillus niger phytase critically affects the catalytic properties. FEBS Lett., 472: 169-172.

 

Tyagi PK, Tyagi PK, Verma SVS (1998). Phytate phosphorus content of some common poultry feed stuffs. Indian J. Poult. Sci., 33: 86-88.

 

Tye AJ, Siu FK, Leung TY and Lim BL (2002). Molecular cloning and the biochemical characterization of two novel phytases from B. subtilis 168 and B. licheniformis.  Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 59(2-3): 190-197.  

 

Ullah AHJ (1988). Aspergillus ficuum phytase: Partial primary structure, substrate selectivity, and kinetic characterization. Prep. Biochem., 18: 459-471.

 

Ullah AHJ, Gibson DM (1987). Extracellular phytase (EC 3.1.3.8) from Aspergillus ficuum NRRL 3135: purification and characterization. Prep. Biochem., 17: 63-91.

 

Usmani N, Jafri AK (2002). Influence of dietry phytic acid on growth, conversion efficiency and carcass composition of mrigal Cirrhinus mrigala (hamilton) fry. J. World Aquacult. Soc., 33: 199-204.

 

Van de Velde F, Konemann L, van Rantwijk F, Sheldon RA (2000). The rational design of semisynsheticperoxidascs. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 67: 87-96.

 

Van Weerd JH, Khalaf KHA, Aartsen FJ, Tijssen PAT (1999). Balance trials with African catfish Clarias gariepinus fed phytase-treated soybean meal-based diets. Aquacult. Nutr.,  5: 135-142.

 

Vats P, Banerjee UC (2004). Production studies and catalytic properties of phytases  (myo-inositolhexakisphosphate phosphohydrolases): An overview. Enz. Microb. Technol., 35: 3-14.

 

Vats P, Banerjee UC (2005). Biochemical characterisation of extracellular phytase (myo-inositol hexakisphosphate phosphohydrolase) from a hyper-producing strain of Aspergillus niger van Teighem. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.,  32: 141-147.

 

Vielma J, Ruohonen K, Gabaudan J, Vogel K (2004). Top-spraying soybean meal-based diets with phytase improves protein and mineral digestibilities but not lysine utilization in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (walbaum). Aquacult. Res., 35: 955-964.

 

Vohra A, Rastogi SK, Satyanarayana T (2006). Amelioration in growth and phosphate assimilation of poultry birds using cell-bound phytase of Pichia anomala. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 22: 553-558.

 

Vohra A, Satyanarayana T (2002). Statistical optimization of the medium components by response surface methodology to enhance phytase production by Pichia anomala. Process Biochem., 37: 999-1004.

 

Vohra A, Satyanarayana T (2003). Phytases: Microbial sources, production, purification, and potential biotechnological applications. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 23: 29-60.

 

Walz OP, Pallauf J (2002). Microbial phytase combined with amino acid supplementation reduces P and N excretion of growing and finishing pigs without loss of performance. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 37: 835-848.

 

Wise A (1983). Dietry factors determining the biological activities of phytase. Nutr. Abstr. Rev., 53: 791-806.

 

Wodzinski RJ, Ullah AHJ (1996). Phytase. Adv. Appl. Microbiol., 42: 263-301.

 

Wyss M, Brugger R, Kronenberger A, Remy R, Fimbel R, Oesterhelt O (1999b). Biochemical characterization of fungal phytases (myo-inositolhexakisphosphate-phosphohydrolases): Catalytic properties.

Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65: 367-373.

 

Wyss M, Pasamontes L, Friedlein A, Remy R, Tessier M, Kronenberger A (1999a). Biophysical characterization of fungal phytases (myo-inositolhexakisphosphate-phosphohydrolases): Molecular size, glycosylation pattern and engineering of proteolytic resistance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65: 359-366.

 

Xiang T, Liu Q, Deacon AM, Koshy M, Kriksunov IA, Lei XG, Hao Q, Thiel DJ (2004). Crystal structure of a heat-resilient phytase from Aspergillus fumigatus, carrying a phosphorylated histidine. J. Mol. Biol., 339: 437-445.

 

Xiao K, Harrison MJ, Wang ZY (2005). Transgenic expression of a novel M. truncatula phytase gene results in improved acquisition of organic phosphorus by Arabidopsis. Planta, 222(1): 27-36.

 

Yadav RS, Tarafdar JC (2003). Phytase and phosphatase producing fungi in arid and semi-arid soils and their efficiency in hydrolyzing different organic P compounds.  Soil Biol. Biochem., 35(6): 745-751.

 

Yamamoto S, Minoda Y, Yamada K (1972). Chemical and physicochemical properties of phytase from Aspergillus terreus. Agric. Biol. Chem., 36: 2097-2103.

 

Yan W, Reigh RC (2002). Effects of fungal phytase on utilization of dietary proteins and minerals and dephosphorylation of phytic acid in the alimentary tract of channel catfish, Lactalurus punctatus fed an all plant-protein diet. J. World Aquacult. Soc., 33: 10-22.

 

Yang WJ, Matsuda Y, Inomata M, Nakagava H (1991). Development and dietary induction of 90 kda subunits of rat intestinal phytase. Biochem. Biophys. Acta, 1075: 83-87.

 

Yanke LJ, Bae HD, Selinger LB, Cheng KJ (1998). Phytase activity of anaerobic ruminal bacteria. Microbiology, 144 (Pt 6): 1565-1573.

 

Yi Z, Kornegay ET, Denbow DM (1996). Effect of microbial phytase on nitrogen and amino acid digestibility and nitrogen retention of turkey poults fed corn-soybean meal diets. Poult. Sci.,  75: 979-990.

 

Yip W, Wang L, Cheng C, Wu W, Lung S, Lim BL (2003). The introduction of a phytase gene from Bacillus subtilis improved the growth performance of transgenic tobacco. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 310: 1148-1154.

 

Yoon SJ, Choi YJ, Min K, Cho KK, Kim JW, Lee SC (1996). Isolation and identification of phytase producing bacterium, Enterobacter sp. 4 and enzymatic properties of phytase enzyme. Enz. Microb. Technol., 18: 449-454.

 

 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Advertise on BMBR | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Help

© Academic Journals 2002 - 2011