OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
           
home about us journals search

African Journal of Agricultural Research

     
   AJAR Home
   About AJAR
   Submit Manuscripts
   Instructions for Authors
   Editors
   Call For Paper
   Archive
   Faculty 1000
   Conferences
   Associations

Afr. J. Agric. Res.


Vol. 4 No.
10



Viewing options:


 • Abstract
 • Full text
 • Reprint (PDF) (123k)

Search Pubmed for articles by:

 

Erdogan N

 


Other links:

PubMed Citation

Related articles in PubMed

Related Journals
Journal of Cell & Animal Biology
African Journal  of Environmental Science & Technology
Biotechnology & Molecular Biology Reviews

African Journal of Biochemistry Research

African Journal of Microbiology Research
African Journal of Pure & Applied Chemistry
African Journal of Food Science
African Journal of Biotechnology
African Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacology

African Journal of Plant Science
Journal of Medicinal Plant Research
International Journal of Physical Sciences
Scientific Research and Essays
 

African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 4 (10), pp. 1023-1031, October, 2009

Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR

ISSN 1991-637X © 2009 Academic Journals

 

Full Length Research Paper

 

Testing the new ecological paradigm scale: Turkish case

 

Nazmiye Erdoğan

 

Vocational School of Social Science Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey. E-mail:  nerdogan@baskent.edu.tr Tel: 312 234 10 10. Fax : 312 234 10 45.

 

Accepted 7 September, 2009

 

   Abstract

 

This study was designed to test the reliability and dimensionality of the revised New Environmental Paradigm (NEP) scale constructed by Dunlap et al., (2000) and to examine the extent to which university students in Turkey are endorsing the NEP. A sample of 1295 undergraduate students from four universities in Turkey was selected for the study. Students’ worldviews were measured by the NEP scale which consisted of 15 statements. A self-administered survey questionnaire was used to collect the necessary data. Findings from the study indicate that there is no widespread support for the NEP: 56.0% of students hold pro-NEP views while 24.9% embrace pro-DSP views and 19.1% have ambivalent views. It was found that the NEP scale has low consistency and four dimensions, thus, the NEP items should be taken cautiously as a single (unidimensional) internally consistent measuring device. It was concluded that the NEP scale should be carefully constructed and evaluated according to the historical and cultural context and characteristics of the population under study.

 

Key words: Environmental worldviews, dominant social paradigm, new ecological paradigm, ecology, environmental measurement.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Advertise on AJAR | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Help

© Academic Journals 2002 - 2009