OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
           
home about us journals search

Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research

     
   JPAPR Home
   About JPAPR
   Submit Manuscripts
   Instructions for Authors
   Editors
   Call For Paper
   Archive
   Faculty 1000
   Conferences
   Associations

  J. Public Adm. Policy Res.

 

  Vol. 1 No. 8

  Viewing options:


  •Reprint (PDF) (87k)

  Search Pubmed for articles by:

 

Adeyemo EO

Afolabi ERI


  Other links:
  PubMed Citation
  Related articles in PubMed

Other Journals
African Journal of Agricultural Research
African Journal  of Environmental Science & Technology
Biotechnology & Molecular Biology Reviews

African Journal of Biochemistry Research

African Journal of Microbiology Research
African Journal of Pure & Applied Chemistry
African Journal of Food Science
Journal of Cell & Animal Biology
African Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacology

African Journal of Biotechnology
Journal of Medicinal Plant Research
International Journal of Physical Sciences
Scientific Research and Essays
 

Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research Vol. 1 (8), pp.150156, December 2009 © 2009 Academic Journals  

 

Full Length Research

 

Estimation of effect size in a meta-analysis of series of validity studies on matriculation examinations in Nigeria

 

E. O. Adeyemo* and E. R. I. Afolabi

 

Department of Educational Foundations and Counseling, Faculty of Education, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria.

 

*Corresponding author. E-mail: seyiadeyemo2007@yahoo.com.

 

Accepted 24 November, 2009

 

   Abstract

 

The study formulated an algebraic path from the series of studies meta-analyzed on the validity of the University Matriculation Examination (UME) in Nigeria; in order to obtain a unique and common metrics with a view of making the results to convey the same interpretation. The study determined both the individual and overall effect sizes of 30 empirical studies. It also established the significant difference, in the probability levels and the effect sizes of the selected empirical studies. The study design is descriptive and involved the integration of correlation co-efficient between two variables. The measure of effect size estimate of each of the studies was based on Pearson’s product moment indicator using the conversion process extracted from the works of Rosenthal (1984), Glass and Stanley (1970). The results revealed a high effect size of 0.78 and low effect size of 0.03. The empirical studies were not significantly different in terms of their probability levels (x2 = 2.680, p > 0.05) but were significantly different in terms of their effect sizes (x2 = 1444.97, p < 0.05). This study concluded that there was no statistical linear trend in terms of effect sizes across this set of studies and that the heterogeneity of the effect sizes referred to fluctuation from the average of the group. The calculated effect size did not represent adequately the outcome of all independent study, hence an indication of moderator variables operating within the studies.

 

Key words: Meta-analysis, empirical, effect size, validity, matriculation, examinations.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Advertise on JPAPR | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Help

© Academic Journals 2002 - 2009