| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full Length Research Paper
|
|
Screening for antibacterial, antioxidant activity and toxicity
of some medicinal plants used in Benin folkloric medicine
L. Lagnika1,2,
E. Anago1 and A. Sanni1*
1Laboratoire
de Biochimie et de Biologie Moléculaire, Institut des Sciences
Biomédicales appliquées, Université d’Abomey-Calavi, 04 BP 0320
Cotonou, Benin.
2Centre
Béninois de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique, République
du Bénin.
*Corresponding author.
E-mail:
latifkabe@yahoo.fr. Tel: +22997 60 48 89.
Accepted 21 October, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
|
Ten extracts from 10 medicinal plants, Acanthospermum
hispidium,
Argemone mexicana,
Byrsocarpus coccineus,
Canthium setosum,
Croton lobatus, Dichapetalum guineense,
Nauclea latifolia,
Schrankia leptocarpa, Secamone afzelii,
Pterocarpus erinaceus,
traditionally used in Benin to treat infectious diseases
and were screened for in vitro antibacterial
activity towards Staphylococcus aureus,
Enteroccocus feacalis, Escherichia coli and
Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The
2,
2-diphenylpicrylhydrazyl radical scavenging activity and
toxicity assay using Artemia salina were also
performed.
All extracts were effective against tested
microorganisms at different level with MIC ranking from
0.31 to 10 mg/ml.
The best inhibition on the growth of tested bacteria was
observed with four extracts obtained from D.
guineense, N. latifolia, and P. erinaceus
(MIC = 0.313 mg/ml). The species S. aureus
and E. faecalis were more sensitive than the
other test bacteria. All extracts showed good radical
scavenging activity range from 1.35 to 3.47 µg/ml. The
most effective extract was the methanolic extract of
S. leptocarpa, with an EC50 value of 1.35
µg/ml. The lethality test showed that all tested
extracts have low toxicity against the shrimps with LC50
values ranging from 3.8 to 8.17 mg/ml.
The results provide an evidence of the traditional use
of same collected plants in the treatment of infective
diseases.
Key words:
Antibacterial, antioxidant, toxicity, traditional
medicine, Benin.
|
|
|
|
Introduction |
|
|
|
According to World Health Organization, more than 80% of the world's
population relies on traditional medicine for their primary
healthcare needs (WHO, 2008). In developing countries, low income
people such as farmers, people of small isolate villages and native
communities use folk medicine for the treatment of common infectious
diseases. These plants are ingested as
decoctions,
teas or juice preparations (Gonzalez, 1980). The development of drug
resistance in human pathogens against commonly used
antibiotics has necessitated a search for new antimicrobial
substances from other sources including plants. Making antibacterial
therapy effective, safe and affordable has been the focus of
interest during recent years (Sharma et al., 2002).
There are several reports on antimicrobial activity of different
herbal extracts
(Adelakun
et al., 2001; Camporese et al., 2003; Bonjar, 2004; de Boer et al.,
2005; Nair et al., 2005;
Varsha et al., 2009).
In recent years, the studies on “oxidative stress” and its adverse
effects on human health have become a subject of considerable
interest. It is well documented fact that exposure of organism to
exogenous and endogenous factors generates a wide range of reactive
oxygen species resulting in homeostatic imbalance (Halliwell et
al., 1992).
Table 1.
Selected plants for in vitro antibacterial activity.
|
Botanical name/family |
Local name |
Used part |
Voucher No |
|
Acanthospermum hispidium/Asteraceae |
Togbama (F), dagouro (Y), tanga (B) |
AP |
AA6358/HNB |
|
Argemone mexicana/Papaveraceaea |
Débio (F, G), Timtonyakourou (B) |
EP |
AA6359/HNB |
|
Byrsocarpus coccineus/
Connaraceae |
Anyomma (F,G), Amodjè (Y) |
R |
AA6362/HNB |
|
Croton
lobatus/Euphorbiaceae |
Aloviaton (G, F), Erougali (Y) |
AP |
Hp 565a |
|
Canthium setosum/
Rubiaceae |
Avovoun (G, F), Igielera (Y.N.) |
AP |
Houngnon 3435 |
|
Dichapetalum guineense/Dichapetalaceae |
Agbagloma (F. Mi), Alo (Y.N.) |
L |
Av 1551 |
|
Nauclea latifolia/Rubiaceae |
Ko (G,F), Igbessi (Y), Ganyèrou (B) |
R |
AA6363/HNB |
|
Pterocarpus erinaceus/Papilionaceae |
|
AP |
AA6364/HNB |
|
Schrankia leptocarpa/
Mimosaceae |
Ahosibwasa (G), Danhunkan (F), Kpatanwo olokun (Y.N.) |
EP |
Houngnon 954b |
|
Secamone afzelii
/
Asclepiadaceae |
Zunkuju (G), Ewe ayibu (Y.N.) |
AP |
Souza 1202a |
B: Bariba; F: Fon; G: goun; Y: Yoruba; N: Nago; Mi: Mina; AP: aerial
part; EP: entire plant; L: leaves; R: roots.
Many efforts have been made to discover new antimicrobial and
antioxidant compounds from various kinds of sources such as
micro-organisms, animals, and plants. Systematic screening of folk
remedies is another strategy in the discovery of novel effective
compounds (Walter and Memory, 1995).
In
our search for natural products with antimicrobial and antioxidant
activities, we investigated traditional plants used in Benin to
treat infectious diseases. A registry of fourty (40) traditional
remedies used to cure diarrhea, stomachache, dysentery and malaria
by traditional
plants practitioners and sellers in Benin
was worked out. In our previous work, we determined the antimalarial
activity of some species (Weniger et al., 2004). In the present
study we investigate the antibacterial and antioxidant activities of
ten species belonging to nine families. The toxicity of extracts was
also determinated using Artemia salina lethality test.
|
|
|
|
Experimental |
|
|
|
Plant material
The selected species (Table 1) were collected between
December 2008 and January 2009 in different area in
South Benin: Secamone afzelii (Schutt.) K. Schum.
(Asclepiadaceae) and Croton lobatus L. (Euphorbiaceae)
were collected in the Atlantique Department (Southern
Benin), Dichapetalum guineense (DC.) Keay (Dichapetalaceae),
Canthium setosum Hiern. (Rubiaceae) and
Schrankia leptocarpa DC. (Mimosaceae) were collected
in Oueme Department (Southeastern Benin),
Nauclea latifolia
(Rubiaceae) was collected in Littoral
department (Southern Benin);
Byrsocarpus coccineus
(Connaraceae),
Argemone mexicana
(Papaveraceae),
Acanthospermum hispidium
(Asteraceae) and Pterocarpus erinaceus (Papilionaceae)
were provided by the plants sellers from the market of
Degakon in Cotonou,
Department
of Littoral
(Southern Benin). Botanical determination was
performed by taxonomists from the Herbier National of
University of Abomey-Calavi in Benin and voucher
specimens were deposited at the same herbarium (BENIN).
Preparation of extracts
Collected species was left at room temperature (25°C) in
laboratory for two weeks to dry. Samples were chopped
into smaller pieces and then ground into powder using
GRINDER 3S.S. JARS, EXCELLA.
Dry powdered aerial parts obtained (20 g) was
exhaustively extracted three time with 200 ml of
methanol. The suspension was further filtered through
Whatman filter paper (Whatman international Ltd,
Maidstone, England).
The filtrates were taken to dryness under vacuum and the
residues were stored at 4°C until testing.
Antimicrobial screening
The following test organisms were used to determine the
Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of the plant
extracts: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923,
Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and Enteroccocus faecalis
ATCC 29212. These strains are widely used in screening
tests. To determine the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration
(MIC) of plants extracts against each of these
organisms, the microplate dilution method using
tetrazolium violet to indicate growth of the bacteria
was used (Eloff, 1998). Extracts were reconstituted to
20 mg/ml with a mixture of distilled water/acetone (v/v
1:1). Briefly, 100 µl microliters of the extract
solution obtained were serial diluted in 96-well
microplates. One colony of each organism was introduced
into 5 ml Luria Bertani (LB) broth and incubated for 1
h. 100 µl of the resulting culture (106 to 107
CFU/ml) where added to each well. The plate was sealed
and incubated at 37°C for 18 h. Then, 40 µl of a 0.2
mg/ml solution of p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet (p-INT,
Sigma) dissolved in water were added to the microplate
wells and the plate was incubated at 37°C for 1 to 2 h.
The MIC value, which is the lowest concentration of
plant extract, at which bacterial growth was inhibited
was then determined. Tests were performed at least in
triplicate. Gentamicin was used as positive control.
DPPH radical scavenging activity
Free Radical Scavenging Activity was determined
by means, the method previously described by
Schmeda-Hirschmann et al. (2003) in which the
2,2-diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH)
was used. The DPPH solution was freshly prepared daily,
stored in a flask covered with aluminium foil. The flask
was kept in the dark at 4°C between the measurements.
0.75 ml of a methanolic solution of the extract at
different concentrations ranging from 1 to 100 µg/ml was
placed in a test tube, and 1.5 ml of a DPPH methanolic
solution (20 mg/L) was added to each tube. The samples
were incubated for 20 min in the dark at 30°C and the
decrease in absorbance at 517 nm was measured against a
control prepared with methanol and a blank sample, using
a spectrophotometer (Genova). The radical scavenging
activities or
decoloring
percentage (DP), which is defined as the concentration
of substrate that causes loss of the DPPH activity, were
calculated as described by Schmeda-Hirschmann et al.
(2003).
The experiments were
carried out in triplicates.
L-ascorbic acid
was used as a positive control compound in this assay.
Table 2.
MIC (mg/ml) of methanol extracts of collected
ethnomedicinal plants on four bacteria species (P.
aeruginosa, E. faecalis, S. aureus, E. coli)
after 18 h of incubation.
|
Botanical name |
Tested bacteria |
|
P. aeruginosa
ATCC 27853. |
E. faecalis
ATCC 29212 |
S. aureus
ATCC 25923 |
E. coli
ATCC 25922 |
|
Acanthospermum hispidium |
>10 |
0.313 |
0.625 |
5 |
|
Argemone mexicana |
>10 |
>10 |
2.5 |
>10 |
|
Byrsocarpus coccineus |
1.25 |
1.25 |
1.25 |
5 |
|
Croton
lobatus |
>10 |
1.25 |
>10 |
>10 |
|
Canthium setosum |
>10 |
0.625 |
1.5 |
2.5 |
|
Dichapetalum guineense |
>10 |
0.313 |
1.5 |
1.25 |
|
Nauclea latifolia |
>10 |
1.25 |
0.313 |
>10 |
|
Pterocarpus erinaceus |
0.313 |
1.25 |
0.313 |
>10 |
|
Schrankia leptocarpa |
2.5 |
0.625 |
2.5 |
5 |
|
Secamone afzelii
|
>10 |
10 |
1.5 |
>10 |
|
Gentamicin (mg/ml) |
0.08 |
0.02 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
Artemia salina toxicity assay
The A. salina (brine shrimp) toxicity assay was
performed following a slightly modified version of the
method described by Solis et al. (1993). This assay was
used to predict the presence, in the extracts, of
cytotoxic activity (Meyer et al., 1982). Initial
concentration of each extract of plant was 20 mg/ml
diluted with two-fold dilutions in 96-well microplates
to make 10 concentrations, the lowest being 0.039 mg/ml;
Each well containing 15 nauplii. After 24 h incubation
at room temperature, the mortality of nauplii was
determined.
The number of dead
nauplii
was plotted against the sample extract concentration,
and a logarithmic regression curve was established in
order to calculate the IC50, which is the
amount of sample necessary to kill 50% of the nauplii.
Cyclophosphamide was used as positive control.
|
|
|
|
Results and Discussion |
|
|
|
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
The parts traditionally used of each of the ten plants
were extracted with methanol. In vitro
antibacterial activity of the 10 extracts are shown in
Table 2.
All extracts showed antibacterial activity by inhibiting
one or more microorganisms.
The highest antibacterial
activities were found for the extracts of
Acanthospermum hispidium
and
D. guineense
against
E. faecalis;
N. latifolia
against
S. aureus;
P. erinaceus
against
S. aureus
and P. aeruginosa
(MIC = 0.31 mg/ml).
The methanolic extract of
A. hispidium,
Canthium setosum
and S. leptocarpa
all showed MIC value of 0.62 mg/ml.
E. faecalis
and S. aureus were the most susceptible bacteria
to all plant extracts (0.31 ≤ MIC ≤ 1.25).
P. aeruginosa
exhibited only slight susceptibility with most MIC
values beyond 10 mg/ml.
This fact could be attributed to the naturally
resistance of this bacteria to many antibiotics due to
the permeability barrier afforded by its outer membrane
(Apak and Olila, 2006). None of the extracts was more
active against the tested bacteria than the positive
control.
All extracts were active against both gram-positive (S.
aureus) and Gram-negative (P. aeruginosa,
E. faecalis, E. coli) tested bacteria.
Gram-negative bacteria are generally more resistant
compared to the gram-positive ones (Cos et al., 2006).
This could explain
the results obtained with A. mexicana and S.
afzelii which are only effective against
Gram+ bacteria (S. aureus) with a MIC of 2.5
mg/ml and 1.25 mg/ml respectively.
C. lobatus
showed a specific activity against only one gram–
bacteria (E. faecalis).
The species used in this study had never been evaluated
or only partially studied for antibacterial activity.
The root extract of N. latifolia was found to
inhibit the growth of S. aureus and P.
aeruginosain this study, while Kubmarawa et al.
(2007) obtained no activity against both bacteria using
the stem bark extract. Kubmarawa et al. (2007) reported
good antibacterial activity against E. coli (0.1
mg/ml).
DPPH radical scavenging activity
The radical scavenging activities of the
different extracts are also showed in Table 3. The
quantitative DPPH test of the ten extracts revealed that
all of them having various degrees of antioxidant
properties, with IC50 values ranged from 1.35
to 3.47µg/ml.
S. leptocarpa
are the most active extract with an IC50
value of 1.35 µg/ml. The extracts of
A. mexicana
and S. afzelii also
exhibited good activity (1.73 and 1.74
µg/ml, respectively).
Table 3. DPPH
free radical scavenging activity EC50 values
(µg/ml) of methanol extract of collected ethnomedicinal
plants.
|
Botanical name |
EC50
(µg/ml) |
R2 |
|
Acanthospermum hispidium |
nd |
nd |
|
Argemone mexicana |
1.73 |
0.92 |
|
Byrsocarpus coccineus |
nd |
nd |
|
Croton
lobatus |
1.96 |
0.95 |
|
Canthium setosum |
3.47 |
0.99 |
|
Dichapetalum guineense |
nd |
nd |
|
Nauclea latifolia |
1.56 |
0.90 |
|
Pterocarpus erinaceus |
3.37 |
0.75 |
|
Schrankia leptocarpa |
1.35 |
0.82 |
|
Secamone afzelii |
1.74 |
0.99 |
|
L-Ascorbic acid |
1.1 |
0.98 |
nd: not determined.
Table 4.
A. salina
lethality assay of methanol extracts of collected
ethnobotanical plants.
|
Botanical name |
LC50
(mg/ml) |
R2 |
|
Acanthospermum hispidium |
>20 |
- |
|
Argemone mexicana |
>20 |
- |
|
Byrsocarpus coccineus |
nd |
nd |
|
Croton
lobatus |
8.17 |
0.76 |
|
Canthium setosum
|
4.22 |
0.85 |
|
Dichapetalum guineense |
4.96 |
0.87 |
|
Nauclea latifolia |
nd |
- |
|
Secamone afzelii
|
3.8 |
0.94 |
Artemia salina toxicity assay
Brine shrimp lethality test results are showed in Table
4.
Figure 1 showed the toxicity curve obtained with C.
setosum. The LC50 values of tested extracts
ranged between 3.8 to 8.17 mg/ml. S. afzelii
extract was the most toxic on the shrimps with LC50
value of 3.8 mg/ml. C. setosum and D.
guineense showed similarly LC50 value of 4.22 and
4.96 mg/ml, respectively. The higher LC50 was exhibited
by methanol extract of C. lobatus (8.17 mg/ml).
According to the results previously obtained by Zakaria
et al. (2007), we concluded that all extracts tested in
his study exhibited very low or no toxicity, giving LC50
values higher than 100
μg/ml.

Figure 1.
Graph of C. setosum LC50 determination
in
Artemia salina
lethality test.
|
|
|
|
Conclusions |
|
|
|
The processing of the plants performed in this study was
not comparable to the traditional approach when the
plants practitioners and sellers used ethanol or/and
water for extracts whereas we have used methanol for
extraction. In this sense, it is not an exact
replication of the traditional knowledge. All extracts
showed antibacterial activity by inhibiting one or
several microorganisms.
The plants with the greatest antimicrobial activity were
A. hispidium,
D. guineense,
N. latifolia
and
P. erinaceus.
We have also investigated the antioxidant properties and
toxicity of the methanolic extract of some selected
plants. The results showed high antioxidant properties
without toxicity of the extracts.
This results
support the traditional use of some of these plants.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank the plants practitioners and sellers from
south Benin for their willingness to share with us their knowledge
about plants. The authors also thank International Foundation for Science (IFS) and Organization of
Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) for financial support for our
research.
|
|
|
|
References |
|
|
|
Adelakun EA, Finbar EA, Agina SE, Makinde AA (2001). Antimicrobial
activity of Boswellia dalziellii stem bark. Fitoter, 72(7):
822-824.
Apak L, Olila D (2006). The in-vitro antibacterial activity
of Annona senegalensis, Securidacca longipendiculata and
Steganotaenia araliacea -Ugandan medicinal plants. Afr. Health
Sci., 6(1): 3-5.
Bonjar SGH, (2004). Evaluation of antibacterial properties of
Iranian medicinal plants against Micrococcus aureus, Serratia
marcescens, Klebsiella pneumonia and Bordella bronchoseptica.
Asian J. Sci., 3(1): 82-86.
Camporese A, Balik MJ, Arvigo R, Esposito RG, Morsellino N, de
Simone F, Tubaro AJ (2003).
Screening of anti-bacterial activity of medicinal plants from
Belize. J.
Ethnopharmacol., 87: 103-107.
Cos P, Vlietinck AJ, Vanden Berghe D, Maes L (2006). Anti-infective
potential of natural products: how to develop a stronger in vitro
‘proof-of concept. J. Ethnopharmacol., 106: 290-302.
de Boer HJ, Kool A, Broberg A, Mziray WR, Hedberg I, Levenfors J
(2005). Anti-fungal and anti-bacterial activity of some herbal
remedies from Tanzania. J.
Ethnopharmacol., 96 (3): 461-469.
Eloff JN (1998). A sensitive and quick method to determine the
minimal inhibitory concentration of plant extracts for bacteria.
Planta Med., 64: 711-713.
Gonzalez J (1980). Medicinal plants in Colombia. J.
Ethnopharmacol., 2: 43-47.
Halliwell B, Guttteridage JMC, Cross CE (1992). Free radicals,
antioxidants, and human disease; where are we now? J. Lab. Clin. Med.,
119: 598-620.
Kubmarawa D, Ajoku GA, Enwerem NM, Okorie DA (2007). Preliminary
phytochemical and antimicrobial screening of 50 medicinal plants
from Nigeria. Afr. J. Biotech., 6(14): 1690-1696.
Meyer BN, Ferrign RN, Putnam JE, Jacobson LB, Nicholas DE,
McLaughlin JL (1982). Brine shrimp: A convenient general bioassay
for active plant constituents. Planta Med., 45: 31-34.
Nair R, Kalariya T, Chanda S (2005).
Antibacterial activity of some selected Indian medicinal flora.
Antibacterial activity of some selected Indian medicinal flora.
Turk. J. Biol., 29: 41-47.
Schmeda-Hirschmann G, Rodrıguez J, Theoduloz C, Astudillo S, Feresin
G, Tapia A, (2003). Free-radical scavengers and antioxidants from
Peumus boldus Mol (Boldo). Free Radical Res., 37: 447-452.
Sharma KK, Sangraula H, Mediratta PK (2002). Some new concepts in
antibacterial drug therapy. Indian J. Pharmacol., 34 (6): 390-396.
Solis PN, Wright CW, Anderson MM, Gupta MP, Phillipson JD (1993). A
microwell cytotoxicity assay using Artemia salina (Brine
shrimp). Planta Med., 59: 250-252.
Varsha V, Asna U, Malleshi NG (2009). Evaluation of antioxidant and
antimicrobial properties of finger millet polyphenols (Eleusine
coracana).
Food Chem., 114: 340-346.
Walter HL, Memory PE (1995) Medicinal Plants as Sources of New
Therapeutics Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden,
82(1): 16-24.
Weniger
B, Lagnika L, Vonthron-Sénécheau C, Adjobimey T, Gbenou J,
Moudachirou M, Brun R, Anton R, Sanni A (2004). Evaluation of
ethnobotanically selected Benin medicinal Plants for their in vitro
antiplasmodial activity. J. Ethnopharmacol., 90: 279-284.
World Health Organization, Fact sheet N° 134, December 2008.
Traditional Medicine (http://www.who.int).
Zakaria HM, Mainen JM, Pax JM, Modest CK, Ramadhani SON (2007).
Antimicrobial activity and brine shrimp toxicity of extracts of
Terminalia brownii roots and stem. BMC Compl. Altern. M ed., 7:
9.
|
|