OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
           
home about us journals search

Journal of Media and Communication Studies

     
   JMCS Home
   About JMCS
   Submit Manuscripts
   Instructions for Authors
   Editors
   Call For Paper
   Archive
   Faculty 1000
   Conferences
   Associations

  J. Media Commun. Stud.

 

  Vol. 2 No. 4

  Viewing options:


  •Reprint (PDF) (184K)

  Search Pubmed for articles by:

 

Negrete A
Lartigue C

  Other links:
  PubMed Citation
  Related articles in PubMed

Other Journals
African Journal of Agricultural Research
African Journal  of Environmental Science & Technology
Biotechnology & Molecular Biology Reviews

African Journal of Biochemistry Research

African Journal of Microbiology Research
African Journal of Pure & Applied Chemistry
African Journal of Food Science
Journal of Cell & Animal Biology
African Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacology

African Journal of Biotechnology
Journal of Medicinal Plant Research
International Journal of Physical Sciences
Scientific Research and Essays
 

Journal of Media and Communication Studies Vol. 2(4), pp. 98110, April 2010

ISSN 2141 - 2545 © 2010 Academic Journals  

 

 

Full Length Research Paper

 

 

The science of telling stories: Evaluating science communication via narratives (RIRC method)

 

Aquiles Negrete1* and Cecilia Lartigue2

 

1Centro de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Ciencias y Humanidades, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), México D. F.

2Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), México D. F.

 

*Corresponding author. E-mail: aqny@yahoo.co.uk.

 

Accepted 23 February, 2010.

 

   Abstract

 

It is quite reasonable to claim that narratives can include, explain and recreate science and that this means of science communication is generally popular. This idea seems to be supported by the fact that many contemporary authors who include science as a theme in their work receive a good reception among the public (at least in Britain). Novels like Fermat’s Last Theorem by Simon Singh, Longitude by Dava Sobel and Neuromancer by William Gibson stayed on the best seller lists for weeks. Plays like Copenhagen by Michael Frayn, Arcadia by Tom Stoppard, Oxigen by Carl Djerassi and Ronald Hoffmann, Diary of a steak by Deborah Levy as well as Blue heart by Caryl Churchill enjoyed complete sell-outs in London and other cities in Britain. The explanation for this popularity seems to be that narratives are amusing, attractive, and interesting. Therefore, we can maintain that they are popular. But are they also a long-lasting way of transmitting knowledge? But do people remember scientific information conveyed by this means better than they remember the traditional formats like paradigmatic textbooks? These are questions that need to be addressed. The RIRC method compares narrative and paradigmatic ways of communicating scientific information, exploring their effectiveness by comparing memory (learning) for narrative and paradigmatic information. This work provides an interdisciplinary approach and a novel methodology to measure the success of communication using narratives as compared to other text formats.

 

Key words: Science communication, science and narratives, science communication evaluation, RIRC method.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Advertise on JMCS | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Help

© Academic Journals 2002 - 2010