African Journal of Biotechnology

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

 

Afr. J. Biotechnol.


Vol. 2  No. 2

Viewing options:


 • Abstract
 • Full text
 • Reprint (PDF) (183K)

Search Pubmed for articles by:


Ali BA

Aly OM

Other links:


PubMed Citation


Related articles in PubMed

 

African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 2 (2), pp. 46-47, February 2003

ISSN 1684-5315  © 2003 Academic Journals  


Relationship between genetic similarity and some productive traits in local chicken strains

 

Bahy Ahmed Ali1*, Mohamed Morsy Mohamed Ahmed1, Osama Mahmoud Aly2

 

1Nucleic Acid Research Dept., Genetic Engineering& Biotechnology Research Institute (GEBRI), Mubarak City For Scientific Research & Technology Applications, Alexandria, Egypt.

2El-Sabhiah Poultry Research Station, Alexandria, Animal Production Research Institute- El-Dokki - Cairo, Egypt.

 

*Corresponding author; E-mail: bahyali@hotmail.com

 

Accepted 21 January, 2003

 

 
    Abstract

Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References
 

 

 

Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique was applied to detect genetic similarity between five local chicken strains that have been selected for eggs and meat production in Egypt. Based on six oligonucleotide primers, the genetic similarity between the egg-producing strains (Anshas, Silver Montazah and Mandarah) ranged from 72.4 to 85.4%.  While the genetic similarity between the two chicken strains selected for meat production (Baheij and El-Salam) is 86.9%.

 

Key words: Chicken, local strains, RAPD-PCR, genetic similarity.

 

 
    Introduction

Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References

 

 

RAPD markers can be applied to generate genotype-specific banding patterns. The use of DNA marker technology in poultry as a strains identification has progressed rapidly during the last decade. The effectiveness of RAPD in detecting polymorphism between chicken populations and their applicability in population studies and establishing genetic relationships among chicken populations have been reported by Sharma et al. (2001). This technology is currently being adopted for the discrimination of genetic resources of economically important Egyptian animals such as poultry, and other farm animals. This technique is playing a significant role in the strains protection law.

 

RAPD assay is simple, fast, and comparatively low-cost. It has quickly become the method of choice for genotype identification, population and pedigree analysis, phylogenic studies and genetic mapping.  We have earlier demonstrated the genetic variability in 17th generation of Japanese quail selected for high eggs and meat production (Ali et al., 2002). In poultry, RAPDs has been used to detect specific markers (Zhang et al., 1995), to estimate genetic relatedness among various poultry species (Sharma et al., 1998; Smith et al., 1996), as well as for genome mapping (Levin et al., 1993). We have also presented some preliminary data showing molecular differences between Egyptian chicken strains (Ali and Ahmed, 2001), and indicating the potential use of RAPD markers for a wide range of applications in poultry breeding. According to Howard and Moore (1984), there are various well-developed strains of poultry that are used commercially. However, information about the genetic characterization of these strains and the amount of genetic diversity among them is minimal. Hence more studies are needed to characterize these strains genetically and to estimate the genetic variability between them in order to enhance selection and breeding. 

 
 
    Materials and Methods  

Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References

 

 

The following chicken strains, Anshas, Silver Montazah, Mandarah, Baheij and El-Salam, were collected from El-Sabhiah Poultry Research Station, Alexandria, Animal Production Research Institute, Dokki, Egypt. DNA extraction was carried out by method of Sharma et al. (2000). The concentration of DNA and its relative purity were determined using a spectro-photometer based on absorbance at 260 and 280 nm respectively. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) mixture (25 mL) consisted of 0.64 U of Taq DNA polymerase, 25 pmol dNTPs, and 25 pmol of random primer, and 40 ng of genomic DNA. The reaction mixture was placed on a DNA thermal cycler (Perkin Elmer 9700). The PCR programme included an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 2 mins followed by 45 cycles with 94°C for 30 seconds for DNA denaturation, annealing as mentioned with each primer, extension at 72°C for 30 seconds and final extension at 72 °C for 10 minutes were carried out. The amplified DNA fragments were separated on 2.5% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. The amplified pattern was visualized on a UV transilluminator and photographed.

 

The RAPD bands were scored for their presence (1) or absence (0). The index of similarity between each two strains was calculated using the formula: Bab=2Nab/(Na+Nb), where Nab is the number of common fragments observed in individuals a and b, and Na and Nb are the total number of fragments scored in a and b, respectively (Lynch, 1990). The similarity index was calculated for each primer separately, and the average for all primers was carried out with each comparison.

  

 
    Results and Discussion

Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References
 

 

 

 

Among ten primers screened, six successfully amplified genomic DNA from samples of chicken strains (Table 1, Figure 1). The estimated genetic similarity between the chicken strains is presented in Table 2.  The genetic similarity between the egg-producing strains (Anshas, Silver Montazah abd Mandarah) is between 72.4 to 85.4%.  While the two chicken strains selected for meat production (Baheij and El-Salam) is 86.9% similar based on the RAPD data.

 

 

Table 1. The sequence of the primers used and their annealing temperatures.

  Primer

                 Sequence 5`- 3`

Annealing Tm/Sec

1

AGG CCC CTG T

 

34 / 30

2

ATG CCC CTG T

3

AAA GCT GCG G

 

30 / 30

4

ACC GCC GAA G

5

GAA ACG GGT GGT GAT CGC AG

50 / 30

6

GGT GAC GCA GGG GTA ACG CC

55 / 30

 

 

Figure 1. RAPD amplification products generated by Primer 4. Lane M: DNA marker; Lane 1: Anshas; Lane 2: Baheij; Lane 3: El- Salam; Lane 4: Silver Montazah; and Lane 5: Mandarah.        

 

 

It can be concluded from our study that RAPD markers are effective in detecting similarity between chicken strains and they provide a potential tool for studying the inter-strain genetic similarity and the establishment of genetic relationships.

 

 

Table 2. Genetic similarity estimated for each primer between strains.

 

Comparisons

Primer Number

1

2

3

4

5

6

Average

Anshas / Silver Montazah

0.933

0.933

0.769

0.769

0.833

0.889

0.854

Anshas / Mandarah

0.727

0.727

0.667

0.750

0.923

1.000

0.799

Silver Montazah Mandarah

0.667

0.667

0.727

0.667

0.727

0.889

0.724

Baheij  /  El-Salam

1.000

0.909

0.769

0.615

0.923

1.000

0.869

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

 

This work was completely funded by the Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology Research Institute (GEBRI), Mubarak City for Scientific Research & Technology Applications.

 

 
    References

Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References
 

 

 

 

Ali BA, Ahmed MMM, Bahie El-Deen  M, Shalan HM  (2002). Genetic variability in the 17th generation of Japanese quail selected for high eggs and meat production. Egypt. J. Poult. Sci. 22: 59-71. 

 

Ali BA, Ahmed MMM (2001). Random amplified polymorphic DNA in some chicken strains. First conference of Role of Biochemistry in Environment and Agriculture, 6-8 February- 2001 PP 23-31, Part 1. Cairo University, Egypt.

 

Howard R, Moore A (1984). A Complete Checklist of Birds of the World, revised ed. London, MacMillan.

 

Levin I, Crittenden LB, Dodgson JB (1993). Genetic map of the Z chromosome using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Genomics 16: 224 – 230. [PubMed]

 

Lynch M (1990). The similarity index and DNA fingerprinting. Mol. Biol. Evol. 7: 478-484. [PubMed]

 

Sharma D, Appa Rao KB, Singh RV, Totey SM (2001). Genetic diversity among chicken breeds estimated through randomly amplified polymorphic DNA. Anim. Biotechnol. 12: 111-120. [PubMed]                                                         

 

Sharma D, Appa Rao KBC, Singh HP, Totey SM (1998). Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) for evaluating genetic relationship among guinea fowl varieties. Genetical Analysis: Bimolecular Engineering.

 

Sharma D, Appa Rao KBC, Totey SM (2000). Measurement of within and between population genetic variability in quails. Br. Poult. Sci. 41: 29– 32. [PubMed]

 

Smith EJ, Jones CP, Bartlett J, Nestor KE (1996). Use of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers for the genetic analysis of relatedness and diversity in chickens and turkeys. Poult. Sci. 75: 579–584. [PubMed]

 

Zhang X, Mcdaniel CR, Giamborne JR (1995). Random amplified polymorphic DNA comparisons among broiler lines selected for incidence of tibia dyschondroplasia. Poult. Sci. 74: 1253–1258. [PubMed]

 

 

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Copyright © 2003 by Academic Journals.