African Journal of Biotechnology
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
|
African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 2 (4), pp. 86-87, April 2003 ISSN 1684-5315 © 2003 Academic JournalsGenetic comparisons of Egyptian date palm cultivars (Phoenix dactylifera L.) by RAPD-PCR Said
Saad Soliman1, Bahy Ahmed
Ali2*, Mohamed Morsy Mohamed Ahmed2 1National
Research Center (NRC) Dokki, Cairo, Egypt. 2Nucleic Acid Research Dept., Genetic Engineering &
Biotechnology Research Institute (GEBRI), Mubarak City For Scientific
Research & technology Applications, Alexandria, Egypt. *Corresponding author; E-mail: bahyali@hotmail.com
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Random amplified polymorphic DNA technique was used to compare genetic material from four females date palm and four unknown male trees of Egyptian date palm. The genetic similarity between the four females date palm (Zaghloul, Amhat, Samany and Siwi) ranged from 87.5 to 98.9%. The banding profiles obtained suggested that both males 3 and 4 are genetically related to the four female cultivars. Key
words: Date palm, cultivars, RAPD-PCR, genetic similarity. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Introduction | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Date palm (Phoenix
dactylifera L.), a long-living monocotyledon plant, is of economic
importance in Egypt and all of North Africa. It presents a source of
income to oases inhabitants and creates favorable conditions for
improving secondary crop culture like barley, alfalfa and clover as
forage. The recently developed
techniques, based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), offer a new
tool for genetic analysis and construction of linkage maps. The random
amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique utilizes arbitrary primers
for the amplification of template DNA (Welsh and McClelland, 1990).
The use of arbitrary primers for evolution studies and linkage analysis
has been found effective in several plant species
(Halward et al., 1992; Carlson et al., 1991).
The objectives of the present study were to determine
genetic similarity between four females date palm based on RAPD markers
and identify unknown males of Egyptian date palm through known female
cultivars. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Materials and Methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Plant
materials Leaves
of date palm were collected from the Egyptian Ministry of Agriculture
Experiment Station at Al-Kanater Al-khairia, Kalubia Governorate during
2002 season. The date palm studied were four males and four females (Zaghloul,
Amhat, Samany and Siwi)]. Extraction of DNA DNA
was extracted from fresh materials according to modified mini-prep CTAB
method (Harris, 1995). The polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) mixture (25 ul) consisted of 0.8 U of Taq DNA polymerase, 25 pmol
dNTPs, and 25 pmol of random primer, and 50 ng of genomic DNA. The
reaction mixture was placed on a DNA thermal cycler (Perkin Elmer 9700).
The PCR programme included an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 2
mins followed by 45 cycles with 94°C for 1 min for DNA denaturation,
annealing as mentioned with each primer, extension at 72°C
for 30 seconds and final extension at 72 °C
for 10 minutes were carried out. The amplified DNA fragments were
separated on 2% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. The
amplified pattern was visualized on a UV transilluminator and
photographed. The
RAPD bands were scored for their presence (1) or absence (0). The index of
similarity between each two varieties was calculated using the formula: Bab=2
Nab/(Na + Nb), where Nab is the number of
common fragments observed in individuals a and b, and Na and Nb
are the total number of fragments scored in a and b respectively (Lynch, 1990).
The genetic similarity was calculated for each primer separately and
average for all primers was carried out with each comparison. The
genetic similarity was calculated for each primer separately and average
for all primers was carried out with each comparison. Dendrogram was
constructed using the average linkage between
groups (Sneath and Sokal, 1973). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Results and Discussion | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 1. Primers used and their annealing temperatures.
All
the five primers (Table 1) examined produced different RAPD fragment
patterns (Figure 1). The number of fragments generated per primer varied
between 4 to 12. Genetic similarity estimated between different male and
each female date palm plants is presented as a dendrogram (Figure 2). The
highest values of genetic similarity were observed between both male 3 and
4 with female cultivars, and it ranged from 88.9 to 95.3%. This
result reflects the similarity between unknown male trees and female
cultivars, but this data is not sufficient to identify unknown male.
Identification of male variety exactly needs more advanced molecular
studies. We also observed that the small alterations in PCR parameters or
quality of target DNA can alter RAPD patterns (see also, Williams et al., 1993;
Bardakci and Skibinski, 1994). Thus there may be
reason to view with caution systematic conclusions based on RAPD analysis
alone. On the other hand, the possibility of carrying out compatibility
analysis with unlimited numbers of primers, each detecting variation at
several regions in the genome, provides an advantage over other
techniques. Even if some primers amplify identical regions of the genome
or if the technique itself is noisy, it should be possible to build up
quickly a consensus from patterns of inter-population variation.
Figure 1. RAPD patterns in 8 samples of date palm obtained with the five random primers. M is DNA marker, lanes 1- 4 are the four samples of males and lanes 5–8 are the four samples of females (Zaghloul, Amhat,, Samany and Siwi).
Figure
2.
Dendrogram using Average Linkage (Between
Groups) Rescaled Distance Cluster Combine for 4 females and 4 males using
data of all primers.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This work was completely funded by the Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology Research Institute (GEBRI), Mubarak City for Scientific Research & Technology Applications, Alexandria, Egypt. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| References | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bardakci F, Skibinski DOF (1994). Application of the RAPD technique in tilapia fish: species and subspecies identification. Heredity 73: 117-123. [Pubmed] Carlson JE, Tulsieram LK, Glaubitz JC, Luk VWK, Kauffeldt C, Rutledge R (1991). Segregating of random amplified DNA markers in F1 progeny of conifers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 194-200. Halward T, Stalker T, Larue E, Kochert G (1992). Use of single-primer DNA amplifications in genetic studies of peanut (Aracbis bypogaea L). Plant Mol. Biol. 18:315-325. [Pubmed] Harris SA (1995). Systematic and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA in the genus Leucaena Benth. (Mimosoideae, Legumi-nosae). Plant Syst. Evol. 197: 195-208. Lynch M (1990). The similarity index and DNA fingerprinting. Mol. Biol. Evol., 7: 478-484. [Pubmed] Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973). Numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco. Welsh J, McClelland M. (1990). Fingerprinting genome-using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acid Res. 18: 7213–7218. [Pubmed] Williams JGK, Hanafey MK, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1993). Genetic analysis using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Methods Enzymol. 218: 704-740. [Pubmed] |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |