African Journal of Biotechnology

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

 

Afr. J. Biotechnol.


Vol. 2 No. 10

 


Viewing options:


 • Abstract
 • Full text
 •Reprint (PDF) (152K)

Search Pubmed for articles by:

 

Zaki EA

Abdel Ghany AA



Other links:


PubMed Citation


Related articles in PubMed


 

African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 2 (10), pp. 341-344, October 2003

ISSN 1684-5315  © 2003 Academic Journals

 

 

Full Length Research Paper

 

Sequence heterogeneity of the envelope-like domain in the Egyptian cotton Gossypium barbadense

 

Abdel Ghany A. Abdel Ghany1 and Essam A. Zaki2*

 

1Institute of Efficient Productivity, Zagazig University, El Zagazig, Egypt.

2Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute, GEBRI, Research Area, Borg El Arab, Post Code 21934, Alexandria, Egypt.

 

*Corresponding author; Essam A. Zaki, Current Address: Department of Biological Sciences, 1392 Lilly Hall of Life Sciences, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1392, Phone (765) 494-9837 Fax (765) 496-1496, E-mail: ezaki@purdue.edu.

 

Abbreviations; LTR: long terminal repeat, ORF: open-reading frame, PCR: polymerase chain reaction, RT: reverse transcriptase gene.

 

Accepted 15 September 2003

 

 
   

Abstract

 
Abstract
Introduction

Materials and Methods

Results and Discussion
References
 

 

 

The current study aimed to investigate the evolution of env-like sequences in the Egyptian cotton Gossypium barbadense. DNA sequence determination and analysis of env-like sequences revealed that these sequences are heterogeneous in G. barbadense. The observed sequence diversity, however, seems to preserve the coding information. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that plant env-like sequences group together, suggesting their monophyletic origin. Gossypium env-like sequences are, however, more closely related to elements present in other plant species.  Our result suggests that env-like sequences in cotton have evolved under functional constraint and likely to play a role in the life cycle of these elements.

 

Key words: Envelope, Gossypium, gypsy, plant retroviruses, retrotransposons, retroviruses, reverse transcriptase.

 
   

Introduction

 
Abstract
Introduction

Materials and Methods

Results and Discussion
References

 

 

 

Retrotransposons have been found in the genomes of most eukaryotes (for review see Eickbush and Malik, 2002). Their integrated proviral forms consist of two long open reading repeats (LTRs) flanking an internal region which contains one to three open reading frames (ORFs) coding for structural and enzymatic functions for their replication cycle (Wilhelm and Wilhelm, 2001). Based on their reverse transcriptase (RT) domains, retrotransposons were divided into two major groups: the Ty1/Copia and the Ty3/Gypsy families (Xiong and Eickbush, 1990). They differ by the order of enzymatic domains in the pol gene. Moreover, the Ty3/gypsy family is more closely related to vertebrate retroviruses. The viral envelope (env) gene of the retroviruses distinguishes them from retrotransposons. Structural and functional data converged when it was shown that the gypsy element of D. melanogaster was able to function as a retrovirus (Kim et al., 1994, Song et al., 1994). Recently, the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) has proposed to term the Ty1/Copia and the Ty3/Gypsy families Pseudoviridae and Metaviridae, respectively (Boeke et al., 2000). The Metaviridae are further classified according to the presence of the env gene (genus Errantivirus) or its absence (genus Metavirus) (Hull, 2001).

 

Plant retrotransposons with env-like genes have been reported (Zaki 2003, for review). They include: the Athalia/Tat1 clade of Arabidopsis thaliana (Wright and Voytas, 1998), the related legume elements Cyclops of pea and Calypso of soybean (Chavanne et al., 1998; Peterson-Burch et al., 2000), the Bagy-2 elements of barely (Vicient et al., 2001), and the GM5 and GM6 elements of cotton (Abdel Ghany and Zaki, 2002). Interestingly, a unique Ty1/Copia env-containing element, SIRE-1 has also been described for soybean (Laten et al., 1988).

 

Phylogenetic analyses based on reverse transcriptase amino acid sequences strongly suggest that the retroviral env gene transduced an env gene from a baculoviral source (Malik et al., 2000). In plants, a recent study has indicated that gypsy-like retrotransposon: Bagy-2 of barely defines a lineage of endogenous plant retroviruses (Vicient et al., 2001). In this regard, the fact that gypsy-like elements and env-like genes have been previously described in Gossypium (Abdel Ghany and Zaki, 2002, Zaki and Abdel Ghany, 2003), has promoted the initiative to search for Bagy-2 env-domain in the cotton genome. In addition, this study also aims to investigate the evolution of env-like sequences in the Egyptian cotton G. barbadense.

 

 
   

Materials and Methods

 

 
Abstract
Introduction

Materials and Methods

Results and Discussion
References

 

 

 

 

Plant materials and genomic DNA extraction

 

Total genomic DNA was extracted from the Gossypium barbadense cultivar S14, young seedlings, using Qiagen DNeasy kit (Qiagen, Germany).

 

 

Isolation of Bagy-2 env domains in Gossypium

 

Total DNA was subject to PCR with primers specific to the env-domain of Bagy-2 retrotransposon, (5`-TCAGTTGCAAGAAAGTCGCCG-3`) and (5`-CCTCTATCAGTGTTTCGGGGC-3`) (Vicient et al., 2001). DNA amplifications were carried in an ABI GeneAmp PCR system 9700 cycler with a denaturing step at 95°C for 5 min and the step cycle program set for 45 cycles (with a cycle consisting of denaturing 94°C for 30s, annealing at 55°C for 30s and extension step at 72°C for 30s), followed by a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min.

 

 

Cloning and sequencing of PCR-amplified fragments

 

Expected PCR-amplified fragments were excised from the agarose gel and purified using Qiagen Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen, Germany). Purified DNA fragments were then cloned in pCR 4-TOPO vector with TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, USA) in the competent E. coli strain TOPO 10. Plasmid DNA was isolated using QIA Spin mini-prep kit (Qiagen, Germany). Plasmid DNA was sequenced in both directions using BigDye Sequencing Kit and ABI 377 DNA sequencer (ABI, USA).

 

 

Alignments and phylogenetic analysis

 

Pairwise and multiple DNA sequence alignment were carried out using CLUSTALW (1.82) (http://www2.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw; Thompson et al. 1994). Bootstrap neighbor-joining tree (Saitou and Nei, 1987) was generated using MEGA 2.1 (Kumar et al., 2001) from CLUSTALW alignments.

 

 
   

Results and Discussion

 
Abstract
Introduction

Materials and Methods

Results and Discussion
References

 

 

  

PCR amplification with primers specific for the env domain of the barely Bagy-2 retrotransposon (Vicient et al., 2001) was employed to search for the env-like domains in G. barbadense. Expected amplicons were cloned in pCR 4-TOPO vector. Two G. barbadense recombinant clones were randomly selected and further studied by DNA sequence analysis.  These clones were designated GB and GB1, respectively. GB and GB1 sequences have been deposited in the NCBI nucleotide sequence database, GenBank; with the accession numbers AY257162 and AY257163 respectively. Blast search confirmed the env nature of the cloned products. Furthermore, GB and GB1 derived amino acid sequences are compared to the Bagy-2 env domain (Vicient et al., 2001) in Figure 1, with amino acid similarities of 67% and 80%, respectively.  The high amino acid similarities observed supports the interpretation that GB and GB1 represent portions of the env gene of Bagy-2 retrotransposon.

   

 

 

Figure 1. Alignment of the putative envelope-like domain of G. barbadense: GB, GB1, and barley Bagy-2 retrotransposon (Vicient et al., 2001). Identical amino acids are identical by asterisks. Key; 1: Bagy-2, 2: GB1, 3: GB.

 

 

Comparative nucleotide and amino acid sequences analysis of GB and GB1 using ClustalW program revealed identities of 75% and 72%, respectively (Figure 2). The level of nucleotide and amino acid identities observed for GB and GB1 is comparable to that reported for the Bagy-2 element, where 86% identity between the genomic copies was observed (Vicient et al., 2001).  Despite the fact that multiple gaps were introduced for GB and GB1 at the nucleotide sequence analysis to compensate for the sequence length polymorphism and deletions, yet it seems to preserve the coding information evident to the overall high amino acids homology. A similar pattern of length variation, deletions and coding information conservation was recently reported in the SIRE-1 elements of soybean (Laten et al., 2003).

   

 

Figure 2. Comparative DNA (A) and amino acid (B) sequences analysis of G. barbadense putative envelope-like elements: GB and GB1 using CLUSTALW.

 

 

We have previously identified env-like genes in Gossypium using specific oligonucleotides for the Drosophila gypsy env-gene (Abdel Ghany and Zaki, 2002). Comparative amino acid sequences of env-like sequences in Gossypium were performed (Figure 3). Moreover, nucleotide pairwise comparisons revealed a diversity range of 7 to 81% among Gossypium env-like elements. GM5 and GM6 are clearly closely related to each with nucleotide and amino acid sequences identities of 81% and 79%, respectively.

   

 

 

Figure 3. Comparative amino acid sequence analysis of G. barbadense putative envelope-like elements: GB, GB1, GM5 and GM6 using CLUSTALW.

 

 

 

Relationships among Gossypium env-like genes and other organisms were assessed by constructing a neighbor-joining tree (Saitou and Nei, 1987), with accession numbers on the tree, and the Drosophila gypsy as the outgroup (Figure 4). The phylogenetic analysis revealed high level of amino acid sequences diversity as evident by the branch lengths which are proportional to the degree of divergence. In addition, plant env-like sequences group together, suggesting their monophyletic origin. Gossypium env-like sequences are, however, more closely related to elements present in other plant species. GM5 has the strongest affinity with soybean element SIRE-1. On the other hand, GB and GB1 closest homologue is that of barley Bagy-2 element.

   

 

Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree showing relationship between envelope domain amino acid sequences of G. barbadense (underlined), plant and Drosophila gypsy group retrotransposons. The Neighbor-Joining method (Saito and Nei, 1987) was employed to construct the tree, with branch lengths propotional to the degree of divergence between the amino acid sequences. The numbers on the branches represent bootstrap value of 1,000 replicates. Names refer to the accession number of the nucleotide sequences that encode the corresponding envelope domain.    

 

 

In this study, we investigated the evolution of env-like sequences in the Egyptian cotton. Our analysis revealed that these sequences are comprised of a very heterogeneous collection of env-like sequences. The observed sequence diversity, however, seems to maintain the ORFs and thus preserve coding information. This suggests that the env-like sequences in cotton have evolved under functional constraint and likely to play a role in the life cycle of these elements. This suggestion is supported by the presence of conserved ORFs coding for env-like sequences that can be identified across diverse plant taxa (Zaki, 2003). It is noteworthy that such functional constraint contrasts with what has been found in mammalian retroviral env genes, where adaptive selection results in high levels of variation to avoid the immune response (Coffin et al., 1997).

 

Phylogenetic analysis revealed that Gossypium env-likes sequences are more closely related to elements present in other plant species. We previously reported that gypsy group retrotransposons is a standard component of the Gossypium genome (Zaki and Abdel Ghany, 2003). The detection of env-like sequences in the cultivated G. barbadense suggests that these sequences are probably very ancient sequences maintained in the genome because they are located in chromosomal locations where the recombination rate is low and selection therefore less efficient. It should be noted that the chromosomal locations for gypsy group elements are yet to be determined in Gossypium. Alternatively, these sequences could be the result of a recent transposition burst event of gypsy group elements in G. barbadense or acquisition of new elements by horizontal transfer. The distribution pattern of gypsy group retrotransposons within the genus Gossypium is similar, with G. barbadense possessing additional hybridisation bands (Zaki and Abdel Ghany, 2003), supports the recent transposition suggestion. Similarly, a massive amplification process was observed in maize since its divergence of sorghum from a common ancestor (SanMiguel and Bennetzen, 1998). Currently, it is difficult to envisage the horizontal transfer of gypsy group elements in G. barbadense, especially that gypsy group retrotransposons have been detected in the genus Gossypium. Further experimental data such as copy number determination, chromosomal distribution, and sequencing of large contiguous regions of the Gossypium genome will significantly add up fundamental knowledge about the role of gypsy group retrotransposons in shaping and evolution of the Gossypium genome.

 

The mammalian retroviral env gene is a highly diverging sequence in relation to the highly diverse sequences of the receptor molecules with which env proteins interact for virus-cell interaction and entry (Coffin et al., 1997). Nevertheless, the elucidation of various retroviral env complexes show a highly conserved structural conservation possibly reflecting a common mechanism for mammalian retroviruses for triggering the fusion and entry process (Eickbush and Malik, 2002). In this regard, the functional role for plant retroviruses for viral propagation in the plant host is still unknown, and cell walls rule out membrane fusion as a suitable invasive strategy (Zaki, 2003). The identification of a replication-competent plant retrovirus is imperative to determine its functional significance. In addition, to test the hypothesis that plant retroviruses are infectious. Finally, to elucidate the unique biology of plants that has helped to restrict the pathogenicity of retroviruses within the animal kingdom.

                    

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

 

This work was supported by a grant from the US-Egypt Science and Technology Foundation to E.A. Zaki.

 

 
    References
 
Abstract
Introduction

Materials and Methods

Results and Discussion
References

 

 

   

   

Abdel Ghany AA, Zaki EA (2002). Cloning and sequencing of an envelope-like gene in Gossypium. Planta 216:351-353. [Pubmed]

 

Boeke JD, Eickbush TH, Sandmeyer SB, Voytas DF (2000). Metaviridea. In: Murphy FA (eds) Virus Taxonomy: ICTV VIIth Report. New York, USA.

 

Chavanne F, Zhang DX, Liaud MF, Cerff  R (1998). Structure and evolution of Ty3/Gypsy family highly amplified in pea and other legume species. Plant. Mol. Biol. 37:363-.375. [Pubmed]

 

Coffin JM, Hughes SH, Varmus HE (1997). Retroviruses, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.

 

Eickbush TH, Malik HS (2002). Origins and evolution of retrotransposons. In: Craig et al. (eds) Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, USA, pp 1111-1144.

 

Hull R (2001). Classifying reverse transcribing elements: a proposal and a challenge to the ICTV. Arch. Virol. 146:2255-2261. [Pubmed]

 

Kim A, Terzian C, Santamaria P, Pelisson A, Purd’Homme N,  Bucheton A (1994). Retroviruses in invertebrate: the gypsy retrotransposon is apparently an infectious retrovirus of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.  91:1285-1289. [Pubmed]

 

Kumar SK, Tamura K, Jakobsen IB, Nei M (2001). MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics 17:1244-1245. [Pubmed]

 

Laten HM, Majumdar A, Gaucher EA (1998). SIRE-1, a copia/Ty1-like retroelement from soybean, encodes a retroviral envelope-like protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.  95:6897-6902. [Pubmed]

 

Laten HM, Havecker ER, Farmer LM, Voytas DF (2003). SIRE-1, an endogenous family from Glycine max, is highly homogenous and evolutionary young. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:1-13. [Pubmed]

 

Malik HS, Henikoff S, Eickbush TH (2000). Poised for contagion: evolutionary origins of the infectious abilities of invertebrate retroviruses. Genome Res. 10:1307-1318. [Pubmed]

 

Peterson-Burch BD, Wright DA, Laten HM, Voytas DF (2000). Retroviruses in plants? TIG. 16:151-152. [Pubmed]

 

Saitou N, Nei M (1987). The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406-425. [Pubmed]

 

SanMiguel P, Bennetzen JL (1998). Evidence that a recent increase in maize genome size was caused by a massive amplification of intergene retrotransposons. Ann. Bot. 82:37-44.  

 

Song SU, Gerasimova M, Kurkulos M, Boeke JD, Corces VC (1994). An env-like protein encoded by a Drosophila retroelement: evidence that gypsy is an infectious retrovirus. Genes Dev. 8:2046-2057. [Pubmed]

 

Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994). CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-6480. [Pubmed]

 

Vicient CM, Kalendar R, Schulman AH (2001). Envelope-class retrovirus-like elements are widespread, transcribed and spliced, and insertionally polymorphic in plants. Genome Res. 11:2041-2049. [Pubmed]

 

Wilhelm M, Wilhelm FX (2001). Reverse transcription of retroviruses and LTR retrotransposons. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 58:1246-1262. [Pubmed]

 

Wright DA, Voytas DF (1998). Potential retroviruses in plants: Tat1 is related to a group of Arabidopsis thaliana Ty3/gypsy retrotransposons that encode envelope-like proteins. Genetics. 149:703-715. [Pubmed]

 

Xiong Y, Eickbush TH (1990). Origin and evolution of retroelements based upon their reverse transcriptase sequences. EMBO. J. 9:3353-3362. [Pubmed]

 

Zaki, EA (2003). Plant retroviruses: structure, evolution and future applications. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2:136-139. [Abstract]

 

Zaki EA, Abdel Ghany AA (2003). Molecular distribution of gypsy-like retrotransposons in cotton Gossypium Spp. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2:124-128. [Abstract]

 

 

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Copyright © 2003 by Academic Journals.