| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full Length Research Paper
|
|
Discrimination of the Palomena prasina L. (Heteroptera:
Pentatomidae) nymph stages and sex using some morphological
parameters by the multiple regression analysis
Islam Saruhan
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture,
Ondokuz Mayıs University, 55139 Samsun, Turkey.
E-mail:
isaruhan@omu.edu.tr.
Abbreviation: NSS,
Nymph stages and sex.
Accepted 9 December, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
|
Discrimination of different nymphal stages and sex (male and
female) of insects is important in the morphological,
physiological and toxicological studies under laboratory and
field conditions. The morphometric study of different parts
of an insect’s body is needed to obtain an index to
distinguish between different nymphal stages and sex. In the
hazelnut production area of the Black Sea region, amongst
the sucking type bugs the green shield bug (Palomena
prasina L.) is the most important specie encountered due
to its intensity and economical damage threshold. The study
was aimed to develop modeling of the P. prasina nymph
stages and sex (NSS) using body length and prothorax width.
Eight regression equations were compared for accuracy and
adaptability. The best model developed was as follows: NSS =
0.344 + 0.235W + 0.309L (R² = 0.9882), where NSS is nymph
stages and sex, W
is the
prothorax width (cm) and L is
the
body length (cm). For validation of the model, estimated
values for NSS showed strong agreement with the measured
values. Therefore, it
can be
concluded that models presented herein may be useful for the
estimation of the individual NSS with a high degree of
accuracy.
Key words:
Modeling, body length, prothorax width, Palomena prasina,
nymph stages.
|
|
|
|
Introduction |
|
|
|
Among
the
Pentatomidae
(Heteroptera)
species
found in
hazelnut
growing
areas of
the
Black
Sea
Region,
green
shield
bug (Palomena
prasina
L.)
is the
most
important
species.
Although,
this
pest is
known as
polyphagous
and
widespread,
especially
in fruit
orchards
of
Turkey,
it
causes
occurrence
of the
economic
damage
only
in
hazelnut
orchards
(Lodos,
1986;
Tuncer
et al.,
2005;
Saruhan
and
Tuncer,
2010).
Its
population
level
usually
exceed
the
economic
damage
threshold
in
overall
hazel
nut
orchards
in
Turkey.
P.
prasina
feeds
upon
hazelnut
fruits,
causing
dropping
of
premature
nuts and
kernel
damage
that
creates
important
problems
in
export
processing
(Isık
et al.,
1987;
Tuncer
et al.,
2005;
Saruhan
and
Tuncer,
2005,
2010).
Eggs
were
open
within
15 to
21 days
and the
nymphs
pass
through
the 5
instars.
It com-
plete
all
developmental
stage
in 5
to 6
weeks.
The
insect
gives
one
gene-ration
per year
(Saruhan,
2004;
Saruhan
et al.,
2010;
Tuncer,
2011).
Morphometric
studies
of
different
parts of
an
insect’s
body are
needed
to
obtain
an index
to
distinguish
between
different
nymph
stages.
In
different
insects,
almost
several
stages
are
present
at
the
same
time
and
their
size
distribution
overlap
to some
extent.
Therefore,
determination
of the
appropriate
stages
for
individual
samplings
is a
major
problem.
Morphometric
characters
have
been
widely
used by
researchers
to
determine
different
developmental
stages.
Dyar’s
rule
stating
the
ratio of
size of
each
sclerotized
body
part in
successive
instars
is in a
constant
range,
and was
studied
on
different
larval
instars
of
cotton
bollworm,
Helicoverpa
armigera
(Hubner)
(Lep.:
Noctuidae),
(Davoud
et al.,
2010).
Picaud
and
Petit
(2008),
are to
test if
there
are
relationships
between
the
succession
order of
Caelifera
and
morphometric
variables
linked
to
displacement
capacities
of the
different
species.
They
focused
on
overall
body
size,
wing to
body
ratios,
and
sexual
size
dimorphism
of
different
characters.
Develop-mental
modeling
are
commonly
explored
that
used
computational
or
simulation
techniques
(Odabas
et al.,
2005,
2009).
The
simulation
software
may be
general-purpose,
intended
to
capture
a
variety
of
developmental
processes
depending
on the
input
files,
or
special-purpose,
intended
to
capture
a
specific
phenomenon.
Input
data
range
from a
few
parameters
in
models
capturing
a
fundamental
mechanism
to
thousands
of
measurements
in
calibrated
descriptive
models
of
specific
plants
or
insects
(species
or
individuals).
Standard
numerical
outputs
(that
is,
numbers
or
plots)
may be
complemented
by
computer-generated
images
and
animations
(Prusinkiewicz,
2004;
Odabas
et al.,
2008;
Caliskan
et al.,
2009;
Odabas
et al.,
2010).
Common
measurements
for
prediction
equations
in some
models
carried
out
previously
have
included
pro-thorax
width,
body
length
and
different
combination
of these
variables.
The
objective
of this
study
was to
deve-lop
estimation
of
modeling
for
discriminations
of
NSS
of P.
prasina
using
body
length,
prothorax
width
and
developing
software
for
predicting
nymph
stages
and sex.
|
|
|
|
Materials and Methods |
|
|
|
This study was conducted in the
laboratory of the Plant Protection
Department of Ondokuz Mayıs University,
Faculty of Agriculture in 2010. Eggs
were collected by beating sheet method
from different hazelnut orchards grown
in Samsun province, Turkey.
The nymphs hatched were reared on fresh
seeds of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris
L.). Petri dishes, 9 cm in diameter were
used in the experiments. Distilled
water-saturated filter paper was put in
the bottom of Petri dishes to regulate
the humidity. Fresh bean fruits opened
longitudinally and seeds were provided
for insects to meet nutrition needs of
nymphs in Petri dishes (Çetin and
Karsavuran, 2000). Seeds of common bean
in Petri dishes were changed once every
two days. Petri dishes were checked
every day until the nymphs reached adult
stages. Moulting of nymphs was checked
daily and
digital compass
were used to measure the body
length and
prothorax width of each
stages. A total of 50 individuals from
each biological stage were exposed to
this process.
Model construction
Multiple regression analysis of the data
was performed
to develop nymph stages and sex.
The general purpose of multiple
regressions is to learn more about the
relationship between several independent
or predictor variables and a dependent
or criterion variable. Given a data set of n
statistical units, a linear regression
model assumes that the relationship
between the dependent variable yi
and the p-vector of regressor’s
xi is linear. Thus,
the model takes form
Where ′ denotes the transpose, so that
xi′β is the
inner product between vectors xi
and β. often these n
equations are stacked together and
written in vector form as where

Some remarks on terminology and general
use
is called
the dependent variable. The
decision as to which variable in a data
set is modelled as the dependent
variable and which are modelled as the
independent variables may be based on a
presumption that the value of one of the
variables is caused by, or directly
influenced by the other variables. are called
independent variables. Usually a
constant is included as one of the
regressors. For example,
we can take for . The
corresponding element of β is
called the intercept. The regressors
xi may be viewed either
as random variables, which we simply
observe, or they can be considered as
predetermined fixed values which we can
be choose. Both interpretations may be
appropriate in different cases, and they
generally lead to the same estimation
procedures; however different approaches
to asymptotic analysis are used in the
two situations. is
a p-dimensional parameter
vector. Its elements are also called
effects, or regression coefficients.
This variable captures all other factors
which influence the dependent variable
yi other than the
regressors . The
relationship between the error term and
the regressors, for example
whether they are correlated as a crucial
step in formulating a linear regression
model, will determine the method to use
for estimation (Erper et al., 2011).The
most common regression equations used to
develop NSS models were evaluated for
accuracy and adaptability. All
equations were composed of various
subsets of independent variables, such
as body length (L) and prothorax width
(W). Eight models were determined and
selected as the most suitable for
estimating NSS of P. prasina. All
variables in the models below were
significant at P = 0.05 level.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
Where,
NSS
is the nymph stages and sex;
L is
the body length (cm);
W is
the prothoax width (cm)
and a, b, and c are the co-efficiencies.
All data was analyzed using the
R-program. Slopes, intercepts and
regression coefficients of the models
were compared using the R-program.
Correlation coefficients were calculated
between measured and estimated data (Cho
et al., 2007; Caliskan et al., 2010a,
b; Celik and Odabas, 2009). SlideWrite
program was used for 3-D graphic.
Table 1. Regression models for the
estimation of nymph stages and sex of
Palomena prasina.
|
Regression model |
Equation |
R2 |
|
NSS = 0.344 + 0.235 W +
0.309 L |
1 |
0.9882* |
|
NSS = 0.477 + 0.554 W +
0.008 L |
2 |
0.9852* |
|
NSS = 0.548 + 0.425 L +
0.003 W2
|
3 |
0.9859* |
|
NSS = 1.670 + 0.044 LW |
4 |
0.9540* |
|
NSS = 2.231 + 0.003 WL2 |
5 |
0.8805* |
|
NSS = 2.119 + 0.005 W2L |
6 |
0.9032* |
|
NSS = 1.520 + 0.003 L2
+ 0.067 W2 |
7 |
0.9618* |
|
NSS = 2.460 + 0.0003 L2W2 |
8 |
0.8298* |
All variables in the models above are
significant at P = 0.05. NSS is growth
stages and sex; L is length; W is width.
Asteriks denote that P<0.0001.
|
|
|
|
Results and Discussion |
|
|
|
Of the all models, body length (L) and prothorax width (W) were selected for estimation of the NSS of P. prasina (Table 1). Equation 1 had a higher R2 value than other equations tested. Table 1 shows that the R² values are ranging between values 0.9882 to 0.8298. Equation 1 (NSS = 0.344 + 0.235W + 0.309L) was found to have the highest R² value (R²= 0.9882) and the lowest R² value (R²= 0.8298) was found Equation 8 (NSS = 2.460 + 0.0003L2W2). The other models can also be used to predicted stages and sex of P. prasina. That is why the researchers can prefer the model whichever they want. Figure 1 shows that both body length and prothorax width were highly related to NSS of P. prasina. Equations with P > 0.05 and lower R2 values were eliminated at the beginning of this study. To estimate the NSS of P. prasina, 8 models using L and W were selected (Table 1). Of the eight models, Equation 1 showed the highest relationship. According to obtained results, body length and prothorax width contribute to accurately discrimi-nation of NSS by the developed software herein. The using of software is very simple. When the researcher entered the data, the program shows the NSS as a number. The numbers are from 1 to 7. The numbers show us the NSS of P. prasina. Number 1 is first instar, number 2 is second instar, number 3 is third instar, number 4 is fourth instar, number 5 is fifth instar, number 6 is male and number 7 is female (Figure 1).
As a result of multi-regression analysis of NSS of P. prasina, the effects of body length and prothorax width were found to be significant. When the prothorax width and body length are increased from 1 to 7 cm, the NSS increase also (Figure 2). Increasing prothorax width and body length effected positively. Prothorax width is more effective than body length for determining NSS (Figure 2). The estimation models that aim to predict the NSS of P. prasina can provide more accurate data to researches in biological studies on heteropteran insect species. Moreover, these kinds of models enable researchers to carry out NSS on the same metamorphoses studies. P. prasina of 1 to 2 and 3, 4, 5 nymphal stages are very diffi-cult to distinguish morphologically. However, their stages can be understood by following the developments in the laboratory. Furthermore, estimation of NSS saves times. There are no published reports related to NSS prediction model for P. prasina. In this study, NSS are well cor-related with body length and prothorax width, with high R2 values (Tables 1). The body size of P. prasina was significant factor in the estimation of NSS. This method was rapid and was relatively accurate. According to the results of the current study, NSS of P. prasina may be estimated by nonlinear regression models including body length and prothorax width.

|
|
|
|
References |
|
|
|
Caliskan O, Odabas MS, Cirak C (2009).
The Modeling of the Relation Among the Temperature and Light
Intensity of Growth in Ocimum basilicum L. J. Med. Plants
Res. 3(11): 967-979.
Caliskan O, Odabas MS, Cirak C, Radušiene J, Odabas F (2010a).
The quantitative effect of the
temperature and light intensity at growth in Origanum onites
L. J. Med. Plants Res.
4(7): 551-558.
Caliskan O, Odabas MS, Cirak C, Odabas F (2010b).
Modeling of the individual leaf area and dry weight of oregano (Origanum
onites L.) leaf using leaf length, leaf width and SPAD value. J.
Med. Plants Res. 4(7): 542-545.
Celik H, Odabas MS (2009).
Mathematical modeling of the indole-3-butyric acid applications on
rooting of northern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum
L.) softwood-cuttings, Acta Physiol. Plant,
31: 295-299.
Çetin M, Karsavuran Y (2000). Feeding behavior of laboratory reared
Nezara virudula (L.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) on different
hosts. Turk. J. Ento. 24(1): 41-54.
Cho YY, Oh S, Oh MM, Son JE (2007). Estimation of individual leaf
area, fresh weight, and dry weight of hydroponically grown cucumbers
(Cucumis sativus L.) using leaf length, width, and SPAD
value,
Sci. Horticult.111(4): 330-334.
Davoud M, Farshbaf Pour Abad R, Reza Rashidi M (2010). Abolghasem
Mohammadi S. Study of cotton bollworm, Helıcoverpa armıgera
hübner (Lepıdoptera: Noctuıdae) usıng dyar’s rule January, Mun. Ent.
Zool. 5(1): 216-224.
Erper I, Turkkan M, Odabas MS (2011). The mathematical approach to
the effect of potassium bicarbonateon mycelial growth of
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Rhizoctonia solani in vitro.
Žemdirbystė-Agriculture, 98(2):
195-204.
Işık M, Ecevit O, Kurt MA, Yücetin T (1987).
Integrated pest management of hazelnut orchards in the Black Sea.
Ondokuz Mayıs University,
No: pp. 20, 95.
Lodos N (1986). Entomology of Turkey, Ege University, Faculty of
Agriculture, Department of Plant protection. Bornova, İzmir, 2: 580.
Ne Smith DS (1992). Estimating summer squash leaf area
non-destructively Hort. Sci. 27: 77.
Odabas MS, Kevseroglu K, Cirak C, Saglam B (2005). Nondestructive
estimation of leaf area in some medicinal plants. Turk. J. Field
Crops. 1(10): 29-31.
Odabas MS, Camas C, Cirak C, Radusiene J, Valdamiras J, Ivanauskas L
(2010). The Quantitative Effects of Temperature and Light Intensity
on Phenolics Accumulation in St. John’s Wort (Hypericum
perforatum L.) Nat. Prod. Commun. 5(4): 535-540.
Odabas MS, Aydin A, Kevseroglu K, Cirak C (2009). Prediction Model
of Leaf Area for Trigonella foneum Graecum L. Turk. J. Field Crops,
14(2): 144-149.
Odabas MS, Radusiene J, Cirak C, Camas N (2008). Prediction models
for the phenolic contents in some Hypericum species from Turkey.
Asian J. Chem. 20(6): 4792-4802.
Picaud F, Petit DP (2008). Body size, sexual dimorphism and
ecological succession in grasshoppers. J. Orthoptera Res. 17(2):
177-181.
Prusinkiewicz P (2004). Modeling plant growth and development, Curr,
Opinion in Plant Biol. 7: 79-83.
Saruhan I (2004). Researches on biology, population density and
economic damage threshold of green shieldbug (Palomena prasina
(Linnaeus, 1761) Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in hazelnut orchards
of Black Sea Region Ondokuz Mayis University,
Natural
Sciences Institutes. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, p.
107.
Saruhan I, Tuncer C (2005). Population densities and fluctuations of
the green shield bug (Palomena prasina L., Het.: Pentatomidae)
in hazelnut orchards of Turkey. Acta Hort. 845: 549-554.
Saruhan I, Tuncer C (2010).
Research of damage rate and type of Green Shıeld Bug (Palomena
prasina L.Heteroptera: Pentatomıdae) on hazelnut Anadolu. J.
Agric. Sci. 25(2): 75-83.
Saruhan I, Tuncer C, Akca I (2010). Development of Green Shield Bug
(Palomena Prasina L., Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) In Different
Temperatures Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 97(1): 55-60.
Tuncer C, Saruhan I, Akça I (2005). The insect pest problem
affecting hazelnut kernel quality in Turkey. Acta Hort. 686:
367-375.
Tuncer C (2010). Hazelnut pest homepage.
[WWW document].
URL <http://www.findikci.net/prasina.htm>
[accessed 21.07.2011].
|
|