| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full Length
Research
|
|
Differentially expressed genes in white egg 2 mutant of
silkworm, Bombyx mori, at early embryo development
stages
Guozheng Zhang1,2,3*,
Yadong Wei2,3, Dingguo Xia2,3, Yeshun
Zhang2,3, Bo Deng2, Ziyu Liu2,
Jiekui Zhang2 and Chengfu Lou1
1College of Animal
Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, Zhejiang
Province, PR China.
2Jiangsu University of
Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, 212018, Jiangsu Province,
PR China.
3Sericultural Research
Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,
Zhenjiang, 212018, Jiangsu Province, PR China.
*Corresponding author. E-mail:
guozhengz@yahoo.com.
Tel: +8651185616539. Fax: +8651185628183.
Accepted 26 September, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
|
White egg 2 is one of white egg mutants in silkworm, whose
molecular mechanism remains unknown so far. In order to obtain
an overall view on gene expression profiles at early embryo
development stages, the white egg 2 near-isogenic line was
constructed and the whole-genome of silkworm microarray system
containing 21375 predicted genes from the silkworm whole genome
sequence was employed to investigate gene expression profiles at
0, 24 and 48 h post oviposition between white egg 2 mutant and
normal black egg strain. At 24 h post oviposition, 49 genes
exhibited at least 2.0 fold differences at expression level,
including 24 up-regulated genes and 25 down-regulated genes
while at 48 h post oviposition, 52 genes, including 23
up-regulated genes and 29 down-regulated genes were expressed
differentially over 2.0 change fold. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes
and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis indicated that nine
differentially expression genes were involved in nine
significant (p<0.05) pathways at 24 h post oviposition and 24
significant pathways at 48 h post oviposition, respectively.
These pathways were related to amino acid metabolism, sugar
metabolism, and series of major physiological metabolism. Our
results hopefully shed light on the further study of molecular
mechanism of white egg 2 mutant.
Key words:
Bombyx mori,
white egg 2 mutant, microarray, embryo, differentially expressed
gene.
|
|
|
|
Introduction |
|
|
|
White egg mutants in silkworm, Bombyx mori, exhibit
several genotypes defined as white egg 1 (w-1), white egg
2 (w-2) and white egg 3 (w-3), caused by different
deficient pigment metabolism in vivo (Lu, 1991). The
mutant white egg 1 (w-1) is characterized by its white
eyes and the production of white eggs as a result of its loss of
the ninth and tenth exons of kynurenine 3-monooxygenase (KMO,
EC1.14.13.9) gene (Quan et al., 2002). The mutant white egg 3 (w-3)
has white eyes and eggs with translucent larval skin, resulting
from a single-base deletion in exon 2 and a premature stop codon
at the 5’ end of exon 3 (Komoto et al., 2009) while the white
egg 2 (w-2) has the same phenotypes as white egg 1 and
white egg 3 mutants with white egg color, but its mechanism is
more complicated than white egg 1 and white egg 3 mutants based
on recent report (Tatematsu et al., 2011) which suggest that the
silkworm w-2 locus existed multi-allelic mutations.
As of other insects, the color of the eggs of silkworm mainly
depends on the color of the serosa, which is a membrane
consisting of flattened polygonal cells, located between the
yolk and the shell. The ommochrome pigment production is often
accumulated in those specific pigment granules of serosa cells
in eggs to produce the color of eggs, a process that involves
several enzymes and relevant pathways. The first detected
enzymes were kynurenine formamidase (Glassman, 1956) and
kynureninase (Inagami, 1958) in insect homogenates, which
are involved in the kynurenine pathway, and mainly
contribute to the ommochrome pigment produc-tion. Subsequently,
other enzymes such as tryptophan oxygenase (Egelhaaf, 1963a;
Baglioni, 1959), kynurenine-3-hydroxylase (Mayer et al., 1968),
and kynurenine transaminase (Leibenguth, 1967; Pinamonti et al.,
1970) were detected and con-firmed to play essential roles in
ommochrome biosynthesis, with any enzyme gene mutated during the
evolutionary development in silkworm resulting in blocking or
affecting the process of ommochrome
bio-synthesis, which finally leads to egg color mutants.
At present, DNA microarray technology is a cost-efficient and
high-throughput method for investigating the differentially
expressed genes or the gene different expression levels in
different samples on the whole-genome scale, such as human (Son
et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2009), rat (Walker et al., 2004),
fruit fly (Arbeitman et al., 2002), rice (Ma et al., 2005), worm
(Jiang et al., 2001), and yeast (DeRisi et al., 1997). It has
been employed to successfully investigate gene expression
profiles in multiple tissues of the domesticated silkworm using
whole-genome oligonucleotide microarray (Xia Q et al., 2007).
This microarray is a very efficient tool to investigate the
response of the host infected by its pathogen on gene expression
level (Luo et al., 2010; Wu et al., 2011). Based on cDNA
microarray technology, investigators had recently analyzed gene
expression patterns in eggs of silkworm at different stages
during embryonic development from 2445 unique ESTs (Hong et al.,
2006).In this study, we applied the whole-genome of silkworm
microarray to comprehensively screen the differentially
expressed genes of white egg 2 mutant compared to normal
silkworm strain at early embryo development stages and tried to
understand the formation mechanism involved in pathways or the
differentially expressed genes undergoing white egg 2 mutation.
Hopefully, this will pave the way for clear understanding of the
mechanism of the mutant white egg 2 in molecular level and the
use of white egg 2 mutant as biomarker in sericulture further
research.
|
|
|
|
Materials and
Methods |
|
|
|
The white egg 2 near-isogenic line construction
The white egg 2 near-isogenic line defined as Jingsong A white
was constructed with the black egg sex-limited variety Suluanban
as white egg 2 gene donor and the normal black egg variety
Jingsong A as back-cross parent. The theoretical homozygous rate
between the white egg 2 near-isogenic line and normal black egg
back-cross strain was 99% tested by general genetics method
after eight backcrosses. All the varieties used in this study
were maintained and preserved by close inbreeding in
laboratories in Sericultural Research Institute, Chinese Academy
of Agricultural Sciences. The silkworm larvae were reared at
standard temperature and humidity condition with a photoperiod
of 12 h of light and 12 h of dark.
RNA isolation
Egg samples of white egg 2 mutant, Jingsong A white, and normal
black egg strain, Jingsong A, were collected at 0, 24 and 48 h
time point, respectively after eggs were laid. Total RNA was
extracted from eggs using NucleoSpin® RNA II kit (MACHEREY-NAGEL,
Germany), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The RNA
samples were further purified using DNase (TaKaRa, Japan) to
remove potential genomic DNA contamination. Purified RNA was
then quantified using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop
Technologies, DE, USA). The ratio 28 s/ 18 s equal to 1.8 to 2.0
shows the high quality of purified total RNA without
degradation. For each experimental condition, three independent
samples were collected for microarray analysis.
The 23k silkworm genome array and microarray hybridization
The 23k silkworm genome array used in this study was constructed
by Southwest University and CapitalBio Corporation containing
21375 predicted genes from the silkworm whole genome sequence
(Xia et al., 2007). 5 µg of RNA for each sample proceeded to the
fluorescent dye-labeled cDNA using the mRNA amplification
procedure earlier described (Patterson et al., 2006; Guo et al.,
2005), then the labeled cDNAs was dissolved in 100 μl of
hybridization solution containing 3 × standard saline citrate (SSC),
0.2% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 5 × Denhardt’s solution and
25% formamide, followed by denaturing at 95°C for 3 min before
hybridization. The mixed hybridization buffer was loaded onto a
microarray slide, and covered with a LifeSlipTM
coverslip (Erie Company, Portsmouth, NH, USA). The
hybridizations were performed in a hybridization chamber (BioMixerTM,
CapitalBio Corp.). After hybridization, slides were washed with
washing solution I (0.2% SDS, 2 × SSC) and II (2 × SSC)
respectively at 42°C for 5 min. Finally, the arrays were scanned
using the Affymetrix GeneChip® Scanner 3000 7G (Affymetrix,
Santa Clara, USA).
Detection of differentially expressed genes
After microarray hybridization, sample intensities were
quantified using the LuxScan 3.0 image analysis software (CapitalBio).
Significant analysis of microarray (SAM) (multiclass, 3.0) was
applied to infer the differentially expressed genes between
white egg 2 mutant and normal black egg strain. We set fold
change >2 or <0.5 and p value <0.05 as cutoff values for
differentially expressed genes up-regulated or down-regulated (Tusher
et al., 2001).
Gene ontology
and pathway analysis of the gene expression
Gene ontology (GO) categories and pathway enrichment analysis
were carried out by CapitalBio® MAS software. P value used in a
pathway and GO analysis was calculated by a hyper geometric
distribution probability formula. P value reflects the
importance of GO or the pathway in the experimental results. In
the actual analysis, after selection employing the threshold of
P value, we acquired the significant pathway and the GO false
positive rate, called false discovery rate (FDR). It is more
scientific to assign a Q value to each P value to reflect the
selection of this P value as the threshold value of the FDR.
Pathway and GO in the analysis of statistical results can also
be integrated to consider P- and Q-value, according to the
specific circumstances of experimental design set differential
thresholds for analysis.
RT-PCR based validation
The total RNA for microarray hybridization was also used for RT-
PCR validation. The concentration of RNA of each sample was
adjusted with DEPC H2O to a final concentration of
500 ng/μL. A total of 800 ng RNA was reverse transcripted in a
20 μl reaction system using the Prime ScriptTM RT
Reagent Kit (TaKaRa). Quantitative real time PCR was performed
using 1 μl of 1:10 diluted first-strand cDNA in a 25 μl reaction
volume according to the manufacturer’s
instructions of the SYBR Premix ExTaqTM (TaKaRa). The specific
primers of 15 genes and the endogenous control gene Bm
Actin B are listed in Supplementary Table 1. The final
concentration of the primers was 300 nM. PCR reactions were run
in triplicates on an Opticon Lightcycler (BioRad) using thermal
cycling parameters at 95°C for 10 s followed by 40 cycles of
95°C for 5 s, 54 to 58°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 7 s. Following
amplification, melting curves were constructed. Data were
analyzed and normalized to Bm Actin B transcript level by
the Opticon Monitor Analysis software (MJ Research). A relative
quantitative method (łCt)
was used to evaluate relative expression differences.
Supplementary Table 1.
List of primers of the 15 differentially expressed genes at 24 h
post oviposition for RT-PCR validation.
|
Gene ID |
Forward primer |
Reverse primer |
|
Sw00132 |
5’-TCAAGTTCGGTGACCAGTG-3’ |
5’-GGAAGCGGTCTCCTAACAC-3’ |
|
Sw04840 |
5’-ATCCTCTGACAGCGACTTGA-3’ |
5’-AGCCACGGGCATAGAAACC-3’ |
|
Sw21951 |
5’-AGTTTACGCCGCTGAGGA-3’ |
5’-CCACTGGTTGGCCGAGAT-3’ |
|
Sw 01081 |
5’-CTTCCACTCCGACCAAGACT-3’ |
5’-ATGTAGTAACGGTGGGTGCTT-3’ |
|
Sw07899 |
5’-GCCACCGCAACTGTTATCTC-3’ |
5’-CAATCCAGCCATCACCAGAC-3’ |
|
Sw19836 |
5’-ATTGCACGCCAGTTAGAAATA-3’ |
5’-GTTCAAGCGAGACTCCGAT-3’ |
|
Sw15246 |
5’-GAATCCGACTACCGCAAATC-3’ |
5’-ACAGAAGACGCAGTACCAGA-3’ |
|
Sw13395 |
5’-CGGTTGAGGTAATGGTTT-3’ |
5’-AAAGGGCAAGGTGAAGTA-3’ |
|
Sw14678 |
5’-CGATTTGACGTACCGCCA-3’ |
5’-GGACAAAGCTCTTTTTCGC-3’ |
|
Sw04534 |
5’-CGCTTTAATCCAAGAATACG-3’ |
5’-TCCACTCAATCACCGAATAA-3’ |
|
Sw08015 |
5’-GCCAAAACTCCTAAAATAACA-3’ |
5’-TGAATATGTGGGCCTTCTA-3’ |
|
Sw09721 |
5’-AAACCTCGTAAACACGTTGT-3’ |
5’-TTTCAAAAATACTGTCATGGG-3’ |
|
Sw10598 |
5’-TGGCCGACAACGAGAATC-3’ |
5’-TTAATTGAAGACCTCGCGAC-3’ |
|
Sw20824 |
5’-GTCGTCTAATCAAATGTAGA-3’ |
5’-GTTATAAACTTACGCAAGTC-3’ |
|
Sw20970 |
5’-AGAAATGAAGGGGTCGC-3’ |
5’-CTCGCCAATGTCCATGT -3’ |
|
BmActin
B |
5’-GCGCGGCTACTCGTTCACT-3’ |
5’-GGATGTCCACGTCGCACTT-3’ |
|
|
|
|
Results |
|
|
|
The white egg 2 near-isogenic line construction
Near-isogenic lines have been applied to study the (Figure 1
A and B). The gene expression profiles of each group
exhibited significant differences when normal black egg
strain was compared to white egg 2 mutant at 0, 24 and 48 h
time points post oviposition. In normal black egg strain,
the expression level
of 825 genes increased sharply from 0 to 24 h, then remained
steady from 24 to 48 h. Yet in white egg 2 mutant, only 449
genes exhibited the similar expression tendency. Especially,
104 genes of relationship between specific biological
properties and related genes in many plants, such as rice,
tomato, wheat, barley, soybean etc (Young and Tanksley,
1989). In our study, before microarray hybridization, the
white egg 2 near-isogenic strain (harbored white egg 2 gene,
w-2) was constructed with the black egg sex-limited
variety Suluanban as white egg 2 gene donor, and the normal
black egg variety Jingsong A as recurrent parent. Firstly,
the hybrid (F1) was raised between the donor parent and the
recurrent parent and subsequently the recurrent parent
repeatedly backcrossed. At each backcrossed generation, the
progeny was selected for the target gene (w-2) of the
donor parent prior to each backcrossing. After eight
backcrosses, the theoretical homozygous rate between the
white egg 2 near-isogenic line and the normal black egg
back-cross strain was more than 99%; tested by general
genetics method.
Gene expression profiles at the early embryonic development
stages
The microarray used in this study was constructed using
21375 predicted genes from the silkworm whole genome
sequence (Xia et al., 2007). We attempted to determine the
difference of the genes expression profiles at 0, 24 and 48
h time point after egg were laid between white egg 2 mutant
and normal black egg strain. We selected a cutoff fold
change >2.0 for the up-regulated genes at each of time
point, and chose fold change <0.5 for the down-regulated
genes (Tusher et al., 2001). Out of the 21375 predicted
genes in the microarray, 2055 genes in
Differentially expressed genes at 24 or 48 h post
oviposition between white egg 2 mutant and normal black egg
strain
At 24 h post oviposition between normal black egg strain and
white egg 2 mutant, the analyses identified a total of 157
genes that were statistically different. Out of them, 80
(50.96%) genes were up-regulated, and 77 (49.04%) genes were
down-regulated (Supplementary Table 2). At 48 h time point,
178 genes were expressed differentially
between normal black egg strain and white egg 2 mutant. 98
(55.06%) genes were up-regulated and 80 (44.94%) genes were
down-regulated respectively (Supplementary Table 3).
Among all differentially expressed genes identified by
microarray in this study, 40 genes (25.48%) at 24 h time
point and 48 genes (26.97%) at 48 h time point were unknown
due to the absence of genetic information at present,
respectively.
Each data in this study was collected from three repeat
samples. The gene expression patterns from three repeat
samples at 24 or 48 h each time point between normal black
egg strain and white egg 2 mutant were analyzed by Cluster
analysis v3.0 software for hierarchical cluster analysis.
Figure 2A and B show as a bar diagram the number of genes
that were up-regulated or down-regulated at 24 and 48 h time
point, respectively. The gene expression patterns of each
three repeat samples were quite similar in normal black egg
strain or white egg 2 mutant. However,
the pattern of gene expression between normal black egg
strain and white egg 2 mutant was quite different. On the
other hand, there was a good reproducibility betweensamples,
and the genes were successfully distinguished between
white egg 2 mutant and normal black egg strain.
Supplementary Table 2.
List of differentially expressed genes at 24 h post
oviposition meared by microarray between white egg 2 mutant
and normal black egg strain.
|
Oligo ID |
BGI Gene |
Fold Change |
q-value
(%) |
Description |
Organism |
|
|
sw14879 |
Bmb028436 |
33.0000 |
0 |
High affinity nuclear juvenile hormone binding
protein |
Bombyx mori |
|
|
sw18857 |
Bmb031444 |
15.5682 |
0 |
CU18A_LOCMI Cuticle protein 18.6, isoform A
(LM-18.6A) (LM-ACP 18.6A) |
B. mori |
|
|
sw21951 |
swu00925 |
13.6061 |
0 |
muscle LIM protein |
B. mori |
|
|
sw07571 |
Bmb002543 |
11.1555 |
0 |
Similar to heterogeneous nuclear
ribonucleoprotein methyltransferase-like 4 |
Bos taurus |
|
|
sw17388 |
Bmb012614;
Bmb027728;
Bmb012212 |
6.7107 |
0 |
Actin 6 |
Aedes aegypti |
|
|
sw05379 |
Bmb007812 |
6.4169 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw19457 |
Bmb043349 |
5.9540 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw18951 |
Bmb018409 |
5.7202 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw12780 |
Bmb014333 |
5.5765 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw22687 |
Bmb027726;
Bmb029431 |
5.1283 |
0 |
Similar to putative alcohol dehydrogenase |
Apis mellifera |
|
|
sw14332 |
Bmb024486 |
4.6344 |
0 |
cAMP responsive element binding protein |
B. mori |
|
|
sw14657 |
Bmb026771 |
4.2569 |
0.5662 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw14678 |
Bmb026943 |
3.9397 |
0 |
Multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase 2;
MIPP2 |
D.melanogaster |
|
|
sw19836 |
Bmb024025 |
3.8766 |
0 |
Nuclear pore complex protein Nup155 |
Pan troglodytes |
|
|
sw04336 |
Bmb031948 |
3.8516 |
0 |
Acid-sensitive two pore domain K+ channel
dTASK-6 |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw13395 |
Bmb018121 |
3.6836 |
0 |
Microsomal glutathione transferase GSTMIC1 |
Anopheles gambiae |
|
|
sw20084 |
Bmb024309 |
3.5977 |
0 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw05952 |
Bmb017793 |
3.3972 |
0 |
Thioredoxin domain containing 4 (endoplasmic
reticulum) (predicted) |
R. norvegicus |
|
|
sw18518 |
Bmb038909 |
3.3839 |
0 |
Glycine rich protein |
B. mori |
|
|
sw10697 |
Bmb001143 |
3.3569 |
0 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw17848 |
Bmb031447 |
3.3566 |
0 |
Similar to splicing factor 3b, subunit 1 isoform
1 isoform 15 |
C. familiaris |
|
|
sw02199 |
Bmb035313 |
3.2333 |
0 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw14290 |
Bmb024169 |
3.1963 |
0.5662 |
Similar to male sterility domain containing 1 |
C. familiaris |
|
|
sw05620 |
Bmb011740 |
3.1597 |
3.1894 |
Ataxia telangiectasia mutated |
Xenopus laevis |
|
|
sw18245 |
Bmb010729 |
3.0938 |
0 |
Serpin-5B [Manduca sexta] serpin-5A
|
M. sexta |
|
|
sw19898 |
Bmb033824 |
3.0125 |
0.5662 |
Polyprotein |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw09940 |
Bmb038994 |
2.9302 |
0.5662 |
ENSANGP00000026588 |
A. gambiae |
|
|
sw18643 |
Bmb034121 |
2.8913 |
0 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw21809 |
swu15685 |
2.8845 |
1.3786 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw13994 |
Bmb022091 |
2.7672 |
1.4383 |
Tropomyosin |
C. kiiensis |
|
|
sw07399 |
Bmb000017 |
2.7038 |
2.4524 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw15246 |
Bmb031311 |
2.6971 |
0 |
Pre-mRNA processing factor 31 homolog |
X. tropicalis |
|
|
sw08356 |
Bmb013598 |
2.6513 |
0 |
Carbonyl Reductase Sniffer Of |
D. Melanogaster |
|
|
sw22190 |
Bmb019140 |
2.6342 |
0.5662 |
SEC63-like |
M. musculus |
|
|
sw12528 |
Bmb012775 |
2.6247 |
1.4383 |
Interferon, gamma-inducible protein 30 |
X. tropicalis |
|
|
sw12472 |
Bmb012443 |
2.6221 |
0 |
Similar to polymerase (RNA) II (DNA directed)
polypeptide H |
S. purpuratus |
|
|
sw18910 |
Bmb005190 |
2.5814 |
0.5662 |
Transposase homolog |
H. contortus |
|
|
sw17430 |
Bmb024074 |
2.5618 |
0 |
Serine proteinase-like protein 2 |
M. sexta |
|
|
sw11257 |
Bmb004667 |
2.5460 |
0 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw17412 |
Bmb019228 |
2.5058 |
0 |
LP20363p |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw06412 |
Bmb026625 |
2.3922 |
0.5662 |
Similar to GA10180-PA |
A. mellifera |
|
|
sw01065 |
Bmb015655 |
2.3847 |
0.5662 |
RE24382p |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw06538 |
Bmb029492 |
2.3226 |
0 |
Similar to zinc finger protein 91 (HPF7, HTF10)
|
D. rerio |
|
sw22223 |
Bmb021795 |
2.3133 |
0 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
sw14575 |
Bmb026300 |
2.3069 |
0.5662 |
Antennal esterase |
M. brassicae |
|
sw14966 |
Bmb029076 |
2.3045 |
0 |
Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3
subunit 6 |
B. mori |
|
sw00467 |
Bmb006688 |
2.2901 |
0 |
Similar to EF-hand domain (C-terminal)
containing 1 isoform 1 |
B. Taurus |
|
sw12536 |
Bmb012815 |
2.2876 |
0.9576 |
CG3790-PA |
D. melanogaster |
|
sw14012 |
Bmb022191 |
2.2769 |
1.1890 |
DNA polymerase zeta catalytic subunit |
D. melanogaster |
|
sw09976 |
Bmb039484 |
2.2668 |
0 |
Similar to ribosomal protein S6 kinase, 90kDa,
polypeptide 5 isoform a |
S. purpuratus |
|
sw06806 |
Bmb035128 |
2.2653 |
0.5662 |
Similar to Nuclear pore glycoprotein p62 (62 kDa
nucleoporin) |
G. gallus |
|
sw10798 |
Bmb001707 |
2.2590 |
0.5662 |
GASP precursor |
D. melanogaster |
|
sw17215 |
swu10880 |
2.2581 |
0 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
sw02911 |
Bmb000374 |
2.2530 |
0.5662 |
Similar to RUN and SH3 domain containing protein
2 |
B. Taurus |
|
sw20362 |
Bmb036027 |
2.2378 |
0.5662 |
Similar to zinc finger protein 236 |
S. purpuratus |
|
sw15513 |
Bmb033312 |
2.2332 |
0 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
sw05067 |
Bmb002365 |
2.2169 |
0.5662 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
sw05717 |
Bmb013611 |
2.2058 |
0 |
ENSANGP00000004146 |
A. gambiae |
|
sw15861 |
Bmb035955 |
2.2050 |
0.9576 |
Similar to ENSANGP00000010111 |
A. mellifera |
|
sw17812 |
Bmb020198 |
2.1909 |
0.5662 |
Solute carrier family 22 (organic cation
transporter), member 15 |
H. sapiens |
|
sw00485 |
Bmb006977 |
2.1714 |
0.5662 |
ENSANGP00000012541 |
A. gambiae |
|
sw11578 |
Bmb006684 |
2.1681 |
2.4524 |
General transcription factor IIF polypeptide 1
(74kD subunit) |
M. musculus |
|
sw01720 |
Bmb026821 |
2.1629 |
0.5662 |
Mo-molybdopterin cofactor sulfurase |
B. mori |
|
sw07792 |
Bmb005416 |
2.1440 |
0.5662 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
sw17365 |
Bmb007487 |
2.1421 |
0.5662 |
Chitinase |
A. aegypti |
|
sw20668 |
Bmb039216 |
2.1004 |
0 |
Peroxiredoxin 3 |
R. norvegicus |
|
sw21438 |
Bmb016644 |
2.0975 |
0.5662 |
Putative ATP synthase beta subunit |
A. pisum |
|
sw10598 |
Bmb000514 |
2.0829 |
1.1890 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
sw05448 |
Bmb008940 |
2.0829 |
1.1890 |
Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3
subunit 9 |
G. gallus |
|
sw15134 |
Bmb030451 |
2.0800 |
0.5662 |
Similar to fucosidase, alpha-L- 2, plasma |
S. purpuratus |
|
sw09451 |
Bmb030165 |
2.0769 |
2.4524 |
Similar to Hydroxyacid oxidase 1 (HAOX1) (Glycolate
oxidase) (GOX) isoform 1 |
C. familiaris |
|
sw18644 |
Bmb034399 |
2.0760 |
4.2835 |
Urbain |
B. mori |
|
sw08031 |
Bmb008736 |
2.0731 |
3.1894 |
GM10395p |
D. melanogaster |
|
sw11189 |
Bmb004223 |
2.0619 |
0.5662 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
sw03280 |
Bmb007620 |
2.0530 |
0.5662 |
Similar to phosphatidylinositol (4,5)
bisphosphate 5-phosphatase, A |
S. purpuratus |
|
sw00873 |
Bmb012612 |
2.0527 |
0.5662 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
sw04534 |
Bmb037816 |
2.0410 |
0.5662 |
Carbonyl reductase |
P. altivelis |
|
sw17774 |
Bmb009456 |
2.0394 |
0.5662 |
Similar to GA17982-PA |
A. mellifera |
|
sw20001 |
Bmb009519 |
2.0362 |
0.5662 |
Similar to alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase
2-like 1 |
G. gallus |
|
sw05071 |
Bmb002410 |
2.0134 |
1.7835 |
Similar to integral membrane protein 1 |
R. norvegicus |
|
sw02000 |
Bmb031366 |
0.4951 |
0.8917 |
Cell wall surface anchor family protein |
S. agalactiae |
|
sw04230 |
Bmb029407 |
0.4927 |
1.3786 |
COMMD4 protein |
B. mori |
|
sw11579 |
Bmb006686 |
0.4916 |
0.8917 |
Dally-like protein |
D. melanogaster |
|
sw01399 |
Bmb021146 |
0.4894 |
0.8917 |
Protein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit 15A |
A. entomopoxvirus |
|
sw19873 |
Bmb030383 |
0.4837 |
1.7835 |
Mitochondrial phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase
2 isoform 1 |
B. Taurus |
|
sw19262 |
Bmb006986 |
0.4811 |
1.5577 |
Beta-glucosidase precursor |
S. frugiperda |
|
sw20246 |
Bmb014616 |
0.4794 |
1.3786 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
sw07407 |
Bmb000171 |
0.4791 |
0.8917 |
Ultrabithorax |
J. coenia |
|
sw09563 |
Bmb031815 |
0.4768 |
0 |
WD repeat and FYVE domain containing 3
|
M. musculus |
|
|
sw01567 |
Bmb024065 |
0.4719 |
1.2816 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw01551 |
Bmb023791 |
0.4715 |
0.8917 |
Homologue of Sarcophaga 26,29kDa proteinase |
P. Americana |
|
|
sw00121 |
Bmb001792 |
0.4714 |
1.3786 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw21390 |
Bmb004850 |
0.4710 |
0.8917 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw04354 |
Bmb032271 |
0.4657 |
1.2816 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw01808 |
Bmb028240 |
0.4640 |
1.5577 |
ENSANGP00000019924 |
A. gambiae |
|
|
sw03787 |
Bmb019416 |
0.4633 |
1.2816 |
similar to carbonic anhydrase 15 |
C. familiaris |
|
|
sw22152 |
Bmb015872 |
0.4625 |
0.8917 |
unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw01712 |
Bmb026708 |
0.4584 |
0.8917 |
Inhba |
M. musculus |
|
|
sw05622 |
Bmb011759 |
0.4576 |
0.8917 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw20310 |
Bmb025565 |
0.4559 |
1.7835 |
Soluble guanylyl cyclase beta-3 |
M. sexta |
|
|
sw03831 |
Bmb020371 |
0.4458 |
2.4524 |
Similar to molting fluid carboxypeptidase A |
A. mellifera |
|
|
sw01523 |
Bmb023279 |
0.4457 |
1.5577 |
ENSANGP00000014394 |
A. gambiae |
|
|
sw00391 |
Bmb005508 |
0.4404 |
1.2816 |
CG14497-PA |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw01032 |
Bmb015059 |
0.4359 |
1.3786 |
RE64894p |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw00579 |
Bmb008363;
Bmb008362 |
0.4320 |
0 |
ENSANGP00000025956 |
A. gambiae |
|
|
sw12033 |
Bmb009712 |
0.4299 |
0.9576 |
RE69223p |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw00812 |
Bmb011876 |
0.4297 |
0 |
ENSANGP00000010837 |
A. gambiae |
|
|
sw00203 |
Bmb002882 |
0.4249 |
1.3786 |
Troponin C 73F |
D. virilis |
|
|
sw01798 |
Bmb028109 |
0.4206 |
0.9576 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw07787 |
Bmb005346 |
0.4187 |
0.8917 |
Hypothetical protein |
M. sexta |
|
|
sw08313 |
Bmb012895 |
0.4048 |
1.5577 |
Similar to thyroid adenoma associated isoform 1 |
S. purpuratus |
|
|
sw21403 |
Bmb008644 |
0.3998 |
1.3786 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw15202 |
Bmb030969 |
0.3953 |
0.8917 |
ENSANGP00000008377 |
A. gambiae |
|
|
sw01721 |
Bmb026864 |
0.3892 |
0 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw19463 |
Bmb000383 |
0.3873 |
0 |
Ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide
repeat, X chromosome, partial |
B. Taurus |
|
|
sw22319 |
Bmb030913 |
0.3827 |
0.8917 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw12271 |
Bmb011179 |
0.3787 |
0.8917 |
CHROMOSOME 6 open reading frame 71 |
H. sapiens |
|
|
sw01589 |
Bmb024438 |
0.3769 |
1.5577 |
Mucus-like protein |
G. cydonium |
|
|
sw10422 |
swu10068 |
0.3767 |
0 |
Mitochondrial ribosomal protein L10 |
L. testaceipes |
|
|
sw05450 |
Bmb008974 |
0.3755 |
1.7835 |
Neutral endopeptidase 24.11 |
B. mori |
|
|
sw04660 |
Bmb041587 |
0.3702 |
0.8917 |
Serine/threonine protein kinase BRAF |
D. rerio |
|
|
sw04333 |
Bmb031898 |
0.3612 |
0.8917 |
Projectin |
P. clarkia |
|
|
sw13661 |
Bmb019926 |
0.3567 |
0 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw00288 |
Bmb004081 |
0.3525 |
1.7835 |
LP05231p |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw16560 |
Bmb043324 |
0.3523 |
3.3355 |
AT01548p |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw07899 |
Bmb006922 |
0.3513 |
0.9576 |
ENSANGP00000014874 |
A. gambiae |
|
|
sw12787 |
Bmb014393 |
0.3483 |
0 |
Proteasome (prosome, macropain) activator
subunit 4 |
S. purpuratus |
|
|
sw04500 |
Bmb036395 |
0.3424 |
0 |
CG5543-PA |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw14730 |
Bmb027341 |
0.3403 |
0 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw01043 |
Bmb015232 |
0.3374 |
0.8917 |
Wing cuticle protein |
L. migratoria |
|
|
sw01811 |
Bmb028272 |
0.3351 |
1.3786 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw19333 |
Bmb031441 |
0.3269 |
4.2835 |
Chondrocyte-derived ezrin-like protein
|
P. troglodytes |
|
|
sw16327 |
Bmb040403 |
0.3244 |
0.8917 |
cdk-binding protein |
G. gallus |
|
|
sw00916 |
Bmb013327 |
0.3151 |
0 |
ENSANGP00000026666 |
A. gambiae |
|
|
sw00092 |
Bmb001446 |
0.3035 |
0 |
KIAA1736 protein |
H. sapiens |
|
|
sw15126 |
Bmb030382 |
0.2988 |
0 |
Serologically defined colon cancer antigen 13 |
S. purpuratus |
|
|
sw00132 |
Bmb001949 |
0.2959 |
1.7835 |
ALdehyde deHydrogenase family member (alh-9) |
C. elegans |
|
|
sw20240 |
Bmb014222 |
0.2941 |
0.8917 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw11812 |
Bmb008256 |
0.2918 |
0.8917 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw22513 |
Bmb019594;
Bmb003381 |
0.2834 |
0 |
Venom proteinase (EC 3.4.21.-) |
A. mellifera |
|
|
sw20970 |
Bmb015873 |
0.2825 |
0 |
ARM_MUSDO Armadillo segment polarity protein
armadillo protein |
B. mori |
|
|
sw01851 |
Bmb028809 |
0.2540 |
0 |
C-type lysozyme |
G. morsitans |
|
|
sw10080 |
Bmb042171 |
0.2398 |
0 |
Adrenodoxin reductase |
A. aegypti |
|
|
sw22044 |
Bmb006297 |
0.2343 |
0 |
ENSANGP00000011385 |
A. gambiae |
|
|
sw08326 |
Bmb013051 |
0.2282 |
4.2835 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw14002 |
Bmb022136 |
0.1872 |
0 |
Proboscipedia ortholog |
T. castaneum |
|
|
sw15636 |
Bmb034219 |
0.1813 |
1.5577 |
La related protein |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw18073 |
Bmb032136 |
0.1801 |
0.8917 |
chromosome 10 open reading frame 42 |
G. gallus |
|
|
sw13432 |
Bmb018358 |
0.1717 |
0 |
cDNA clone E_EL_fcP8_19A01_R_0 3' |
B. mori |
|
|
sw17991 |
Bmb019426 |
0.1596 |
0 |
cDNA clone E_EL_fcP8_04G06_R_0 3' |
B. mori |
|
|
sw08438 |
Bmb014684 |
0.1447 |
0 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw01593 |
Bmb024458 |
0.1434 |
0 |
Origin recognition complex subunit 4 |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw21758 |
swu05701 |
0.1433 |
1.7835 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw06613 |
Bmb030914 |
0.1363 |
0 |
RE22242p |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw19840 |
Bmb024593 |
0.1193 |
0 |
CG5621-PA |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw13551 |
Bmb019155 |
0.1101 |
0 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
|
sw12154 |
Bmb010503 |
0.1004 |
0 |
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with
thrombospondin motifs like |
A. mellifera |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1.
Gene categories of differentially expressed genes at 24 h
post oviposition.
|
Gene category |
Number of genes |
Percent (%) |
|
Molecular function |
|
|
|
Catalytic activity |
19 |
24.17 |
|
Binding |
13 |
16.54 |
|
Transcription regulator activity |
4 |
5.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
Biological process |
|
|
|
Physiological process |
16 |
13.45 |
|
Cellular process |
15 |
12.61 |
|
Metabolism |
15 |
12.61 |
|
Biological regulation |
3 |
2.52 |
|
Regulation of biological process |
3 |
2.52 |
|
Negative regulation of biological process |
1 |
0.84 |
|
Biological adhesion |
1 |
0.84 |
|
Cellular component |
9 |
6.62 |
Analysis of differentially expressed gene ontology
To investigate the global differences at gene level, the
gene ontology (GO) hierarchy analysis was carried out on the
differentially expressed genes. The genes were categorized
according to CapitalBio Molecule Annotation System (MAS)
software (MAS 3.0) (http://bioinfo. capitalbio.com/mas3).
The MAS software was developed to integrate all differential
gene expression datasets, and defines those GO categories
that share a similar functional role from the differentially
expressed genes according to a gene enrichment
principle. Three GO terms
(biological process, cell component, and molecular function)
were evaluated in our study. P value <0.05 was considered
statistically significant.
At 24 h post oviposition, 102 differentially expressed genes
had annotations according to MAS analysis (Table 1), and 37
genes were classified into four subgroups of
molecular function, described as catalytic activity (19,
24.17%), binding (13, 16.54%), and transcription regulator
activity (4, 5.09%). 56 genes were
classified into eight subgroups of biological process,
described as physiological process (16, 13.45%), cellular
process (15, 12.61%), metabolism (15, 12.61%), biological
regulation (3, 2.52%), regulation of biological process (3,
2.52%), negative regulation of biological process (1,
0.84%), andbiological adhesion (1, 0.84%). Nine genes were
classified into cellular component (6.62%) (Figure 3A).
Moreover, at 48 h post oviposition, 136 differentially
expressed genes had annotations and were classified into
five subgroups of molecular function, seven sub-groups of
biological process, and ten genes were cellular component
(Table 2). Five subgroups were described as catalytic
activity (22, 20.95%), binding (17, 16.19%), transporter
activity (5, 4.76%), molecular transducer activity (2,
1.90%) and enzyme regulator activity (2, 1.90%). Seven
subgroups of biological process were included:
cellular process (22, 13.78%), transducer activity, enzyme
regulator activity, localization, and establishment of
localization, were only detected in the ones at 48 h post
oviposition.
Supplementary Table 3.
List of differentially expressed genes at 48 h post
oviposition meared by microarray between white egg 2 mutant
and normal black egg strain.
|
Oligo ID |
BGI Gene |
Fold Change |
q-value
(%) |
Description |
Organism |
|
sw22666 |
Bmb026840 |
14.5167 |
0 |
Hypothetical protein XP_397032 |
A. mellifera |
|
sw14816 |
Bmb027992 |
12.4449 |
0 |
CG1561-PA, isoform A |
D. melanogaster |
|
sw11607 |
Bmb006921 |
11.3448 |
0 |
Chemokine-like factor super family 4
|
M. musculus |
|
sw15620 |
Bmb034101 |
10.2182 |
0 |
CG13813-PA |
D. melanogaster |
|
sw18046 |
Bmb027675 |
9.6848 |
0 |
Putative protein, with at least 6 transmembrane
Domains, of ancient origin (58.5 kD) (3N884) |
S. purpuratus |
|
sw19457 |
Bmb043349 |
8.8177 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
sw05363 |
Bmb007606 |
8.6616 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
sw14669 |
Bmb026839 |
8.4499 |
0 |
Putative protein, with at least 6 transmembrane
Domains, of ancient origin (58.5 kD) (3N884) |
S. purpuratus |
|
sw05379 |
Bmb007812 |
8.1543 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
sw17455 |
Bmb029210 |
7.8514 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
sw03311 |
Bmb008122 |
7.1548 |
0 |
Antitrypsin precursor |
B. mori |
|
sw19859 |
Bmb028204 |
6.2172 |
0 |
Hemicentin 1 |
M. musculus] |
|
sw17796 |
Bmb016373 |
5.8355 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
sw01040 |
Bmb015193 |
5.5572 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
sw10603 |
Bmb000545 |
5.1777 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
sw17602 |
Bmb013104 |
4.4970 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
sw10441 |
swu11399 |
4.3924 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
sw03212 |
Bmb006210 |
4.2639 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
sw03565 |
Bmb014157 |
4.1932 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
sw03504 |
Bmb012669 |
4.0851 |
0 |
Novel protein |
X. tropicalis |
|
sw12920 |
Bmb015191 |
4.0735 |
0 |
120-kDa protein |
S. peregrina |
|
sw19849 |
Bmb026530 |
3.9738 |
0 |
Polyprotein |
B. mori |
|
sw20070 |
Bmb021738 |
3.5816 |
0 |
ENSANGP00000015204 |
A. mellifera |
|
sw02199 |
Bmb035313 |
3.5592 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
sw14252 |
Bmb023817 |
3.5553 |
0 |
Zinc finger MYND domain containing protein 10
(BLu protein) |
S. purpuratus |
|
sw21980 |
Bmb001284 |
3.2173 |
0 |
Reverse transcriptase family member (XS300),
partial |
S. purpuratus |
|
sw04534 |
Bmb037816 |
3.2168 |
0.8726 |
Carbonyl reductase |
P. altivelis |
|
sw17812 |
Bmb020198 |
3.1408 |
0 |
Solute carrier family 22 (organic cation
transporter), member 15 |
H. sapiens |
|
sw17130 |
swu07146 |
3.1099 |
1.2529 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
sw15491 |
Bmb033104 |
3.0691 |
0 |
ENSANGP00000015052 |
A. gambiae |
|
sw09612 |
Bmb032783 |
3.0336 |
0.8726 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
sw11643 |
Bmb007234 |
2.9878 |
0 |
DGP-1 protein |
D. melanogaster |
|
sw15855 |
Bmb035939 |
2.9850 |
0.6108 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
sw14331 |
Bmb024480 |
2.9384 |
0.8726 |
OMBP_MANSE Ommochrome-binding protein precursor
(OBP) (YCP) ommochrome-binding protein |
|
|
sw01506 |
Bmb022944 |
2.9368 |
0 |
VACUOLAR protein sorting 11 |
A. mellifera |
|
sw13775 |
Bmb020674 |
2.9194 |
0 |
Putative alcohol dehydrogenase |
A. mellifera |
|
sw13900 |
Bmb021430 |
2.9177 |
0 |
CG33290-PA |
D. melanogaster |
|
sw22124 |
Bmb008872 |
2.8649 |
0 |
Chromosome 2, BAC clone 081P21 |
B. mori |
|
sw18473 |
Bmb035079 |
2.8380 |
4.1102 |
Rotatin |
M. musculus |
|
sw11130 |
Bmb003777 |
2.8311 |
0 |
Putative anticoagulant peptide AP1 |
B. martensii |
|
sw16854 |
Bmb029919 |
2.8165 |
0 |
Glycerophosphoryl diester phosphodiesterase |
B. mori |
|
sw08648 |
Bmb017403 |
2.7945 |
1.2529 |
Glucose oxidase [Apis mellifera] glucose oxidase |
A. mellifera |
|
sw06553 |
Bmb029756 |
2.7931 |
0.8726 |
Whn |
G. gallus |
|
sw06806 |
Bmb035128 |
2.7038 |
0.8726 |
Nuclear pore glycoprotein p62 (62 kDa
nucleoporin) |
G. gallus |
|
sw09118 |
Bmb024723 |
2.6716 |
0.8726 |
ENSANGP00000014129 |
A. gambiae |
|
sw17818 |
Bmb022496 |
2.6291 |
1.2529 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw02266 |
Bmb036883 |
2.6183 |
0.6108 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw03770 |
Bmb019103 |
2.6071 |
1.2529 |
5,10-Methenyltetrahydrofolate synthetase
(5-formyltetrahydrofolate cyclo-ligase) |
H. sapiens |
|
|
sw11471 |
Bmb006018 |
2.6057 |
0.8726 |
Cytochrome b561 (Cytochrome b-561) |
D. rerio |
|
|
sw21414 |
Bmb010186 |
2.5945 |
1.2529 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw08900 |
Bmb021285 |
2.5879 |
3.6781 |
CG14321-PA |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw20571 |
Bmb023821 |
2.5826 |
4.1102 |
Endonuclease and reverse transcriptase-like
protein |
B. mori |
|
|
sw03040 |
Bmb002768 |
2.5065 |
0.8726 |
Novel protein |
R. norvegicus |
|
|
sw10995 |
Bmb002885 |
2.4918 |
0 |
GTP binding protein 2 |
G. gallus |
|
|
sw08562 |
Bmb016310 |
2.4868 |
0.8726 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw08949 |
Bmb022058 |
2.4738 |
2.2728 |
CG17127-PA |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw14829 |
Bmb028107 |
2.4450 |
0 |
Transmembrane transporter |
B. mori |
|
|
sw00467 |
Bmb006688 |
2.4450 |
4.1102 |
EF-hand domain (C-terminal) containing 1 isoform
1 |
B. taurus |
|
|
sw09376 |
Bmb028849 |
2.4132 |
1.2529 |
Similar to arrow, partial |
A. mellifera |
|
|
sw12528 |
Bmb012775 |
2.3634 |
0.8726 |
Interferon, gamma-inducible protein 30 |
X. tropicalis |
|
|
sw08305 |
Bmb012773 |
2.3513 |
3.6781 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw19836 |
Bmb024025 |
2.3386 |
0.8726 |
Nuclear pore complex protein Nup155 |
P. troglodytes |
|
|
sw11637 |
Bmb007188 |
2.3365 |
1.2529 |
Beta-glucosidase |
N. koshunensis |
|
|
sw20527 |
Bmb016879 |
2.3326 |
1.2529 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw22151 |
Bmb015744 |
2.3165 |
1.2529 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw17816 |
Bmb021741 |
2.3116 |
0.8726 |
CCR4-NOT transcription complex, subunit 1
isoform a |
H. sapiens |
|
|
sw06242 |
Bmb023470 |
2.3031 |
0.8726 |
Glutathione S-transferase 1 |
Bombyx mori |
|
|
sw12254 |
Bmb011068 |
2.2875 |
3.6781 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw04192 |
Bmb028430 |
2.2682 |
4.1102 |
Carboxypeptidase Vitellogenic carboxypeptidase
precursor |
B. mori |
|
|
sw03148 |
Bmb004849 |
2.2646 |
0.8726 |
Odorant receptor 83b, partial |
A. mellifera |
|
|
sw13847 |
Bmb021130 |
2.2373 |
1.2529 |
LYS_BOMMO Lysozyme precursor
(1,4-beta-N-acetylmuramidase) lysozyme |
B. mori |
|
|
sw14339 |
Bmb024531 |
2.2363 |
2.2728 |
Cell wall surface anchor family protein |
S. pneumoniae |
|
|
sw17630 |
Bmb018507 |
2.2288 |
2.2728 |
CF105_MESAU Protein C6orf105 homolog
|
B. mori |
|
|
sw17679 |
Bmb032274 |
2.2116 |
1.2529 |
Similar to phosphoglucomutase 2 |
B. taurus |
|
|
sw09921 |
Bmb038653 |
2.2077 |
3.6781 |
Glutathione S-transferase 1 |
B. mori |
|
|
sw14500 |
Bmb025771 |
2.2013 |
1.2529 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw06727 |
Bmb033245 |
2.1999 |
4.1102 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw00700 |
Bmb010188 |
2.1909 |
4.1102 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw05034 |
Bmb001719 |
2.1864 |
2.2728 |
cDNA clone E_EL_ovS0_23G10_F_0 5' |
D. simulans |
|
|
sw11152 |
Bmb003983 |
2.1777 |
0.8726 |
MBF2 |
B. mori |
|
|
sw03396 |
Bmb010184 |
2.1751 |
1.2529 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw22244 |
Bmb023779 |
2.1687 |
4.1102 |
D4, zinc and double PHD fingers family 2 |
X. tropicalis |
|
|
sw06509 |
Bmb028730 |
2.1678 |
0.8726 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw14725 |
Bmb027295 |
2.1406 |
1.2529 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw08454 |
Bmb014882 |
2.1137 |
2.2728 |
Solute carrier family 26, member 11 |
B. taurus |
|
|
sw12948 |
Bmb015359 |
2.1024 |
1.2529 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw06173 |
Bmb022240 |
2.1011 |
1.2529 |
Similar to ENSANGP00000015052 |
A. mellifera |
|
|
sw22467 |
swu16037 |
2.1010 |
1.2529 |
Contains weak similarity to GATA-6 DNA-binding
protein |
A. thaliana |
|
|
sw15731 |
Bmb035060 |
2.0919 |
3.6781 |
Similar to transcriptional co-repressor Sin3A |
S. purpuratus |
|
|
sw08469 |
Bmb015032 |
2.0866 |
3.6781 |
Pleckstrin homology domain containing, family H
(with MyTH4 domain) member 2, partial |
B. taurus |
|
|
sw20327 |
Bmb028549 |
2.0795 |
3.6781 |
Prophenoloxidase activating proteinase-2 |
M. sexta |
|
|
sw07486 |
Bmb001246 |
2.0563 |
3.6781 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw19098 |
Bmb020004 |
2.0502 |
1.2529 |
Hypothetical protein GLP_170_76141_77547 |
G. lamblia |
|
|
sw03875 |
Bmb021300 |
2.0464 |
1.2529 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw10581 |
Bmb000368 |
2.0435 |
0.8726 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw04558 |
Bmb038315 |
2.0431 |
0.8726 |
Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein F
|
M. musculus |
|
|
sw13878 |
Bmb021312 |
2.0331 |
0.8726 |
Similar to Eyes absent homolog 4 isoform 2 |
B. taurus |
|
|
sw00225 |
Bmb003317 |
2.0280 |
2.2728 |
mKIAA0979 protein |
M. musculus |
|
|
sw21144 |
Bmb025384 |
0.4983 |
1.6706 |
DRPE65 |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw01653 |
Bmb025563 |
0.4962 |
1.6706 |
Solute carrier family 2 (facilitated glucose
transporter), member 1 |
G. gallus |
|
|
sw20747 |
Bmb003575 |
0.4961 |
3.6781 |
Histone H2A-like protein |
B. mori |
|
|
sw12880 |
Bmb014924 |
0.4918 |
4.1102 |
Similar to lipidosin |
C. familiaris |
|
|
sw20824 |
Bmb007456 |
0.4860 |
2.2728 |
Hypothetical protein MCAP_0861 |
M. capricolum |
|
|
sw04041 |
Bmb025306 |
0.4799 |
3.6781 |
ENSANGP00000019864 |
A. gambiae |
|
|
sw11768 |
Bmb007935 |
0.4727 |
1.0739 |
ENSANGP00000020967 |
A. gambiae |
|
|
sw03530 |
Bmb013207 |
0.4675 |
2.2728 |
Aquaporin-1 |
G. gallus |
|
|
sw01378 |
Bmb020850 |
0.4652 |
4.1102 |
Similar to WD repeat domain 34 |
A. mellifera |
|
|
sw18578 |
Bmb020390 |
0.4533 |
1.6706 |
Clb2p: G2/Mitotic-specific cyclin 2 (Swiss Prot.
accession number P24869) |
S. cerevisiae |
|
|
sw00642 |
Bmb009381 |
0.4514 |
1.6706 |
Similar to glutaminyl-tRNA synthase
(glutamine-hydrolyzing)-like 1 |
G. gallus |
|
|
sw22239 |
Bmb023386 |
0.4495 |
3.6781 |
HRPX_PLALO Histidine-rich glycoprotein precursor
histidine-rich protein |
P. lophurae |
|
|
sw01851 |
Bmb028809 |
0.4486 |
3.6781 |
C-type lysozyme |
G. morsitans |
|
|
sw16325 |
Bmb040396 |
0.4423 |
1.6706 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw18898 |
Bmb002839 |
0.4414 |
1.6706 |
Heat shock protein hsp20.8 |
B. mori |
|
|
sw10080 |
Bmb042171 |
0.4390 |
1.6706 |
Adrenodoxin reductase |
A. aegypti |
|
|
sw20551 |
Bmb020417 |
0.4369 |
3.6781 |
Reverse transcriptase |
B. mori |
|
|
sw04343 |
Bmb032134 |
0.4313 |
3.6781 |
24-Dehydrocholesterol reductase |
H. sapiens |
|
|
sw12464 |
Bmb012391 |
0.4308 |
1.6706 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw18670 |
Bmb002840 |
0.4268 |
1.0739 |
Heat shock protein hsp 19.9 |
B. mori |
|
|
sw13661 |
Bmb019926 |
0.4260 |
1.0739 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw09379 |
Bmb028908 |
0.4249 |
1.0739 |
Similar to tubulointerstitial nephritis antigen |
G. gallus |
|
|
sw09693 |
Bmb034140 |
0.4221 |
3.6781 |
Histone H1 |
B. mori |
|
|
sw01856 |
Bmb028866 |
0.4217 |
1.6706 |
SD27140p [Wolbachia endosymbiont of
Drosophila ananassae] |
D. ananassae |
|
|
sw08084 |
Bmb009643 |
0.4192 |
1.6706 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw14235 |
Bmb023706 |
0.4134 |
1.6706 |
LP09268p |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw12541 |
Bmb012836 |
0.4124 |
1.6706 |
Glycine rich protein |
B. mori |
|
|
sw22859 |
Bmb040666 |
0.4116 |
1.6706 |
Similar to mitochondrial ribosomal protein L2 |
S. purpuratus |
|
|
sw00461 |
Bmb006574 |
0.4081 |
0 |
LOC496020 protein |
X. laevis |
|
|
sw12615 |
Bmb013262 |
0.4049 |
1.0739 |
Pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatase regulatory
subunit precursor |
B. taurus |
|
|
sw22513 |
Bmb019594 |
0.4004 |
1.0739 |
Similar to venom proteinase (EC 3.4.21.-) |
A. mellifera |
|
|
sw10983 |
Bmb002809 |
0.3957 |
1.6706 |
ENSANGP00000009437 |
A. gambiae |
|
|
sw22044 |
Bmb006297 |
0.3934 |
0 |
ENSANGP00000011385 |
A. gambiae |
|
|
sw09721 |
Bmb034697 |
0.3927 |
2.2728 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw05319 |
Bmb006900 |
0.3901 |
1.6706 |
Similar to ENSANGP00000015190 |
A. mellifera |
|
|
sw11189 |
Bmb004223 |
0.3853 |
1.6706 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw21900 |
swu16328 |
0.3794 |
1.0739 |
similar to carcinoma related gene |
S. purpuratus |
|
|
sw05002 |
Bmb000881 |
0.3721 |
0 |
GA15131-PA |
D. pseudoobscura |
|
|
sw11662 |
Bmb007296 |
0.3703 |
3.6781 |
BSDC1 protein |
H. sapiens |
|
|
sw09712 |
Bmb034569 |
0.3697 |
0.6108 |
Mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase |
B. mori |
|
|
sw15254 |
Bmb031389 |
0.3695 |
1.0739 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw13432 |
Bmb018358 |
0.3684 |
1.0739 |
cDNA clone E_EL_fcP8_19A01_R_0 3' |
B. mori |
|
|
sw08094 |
Bmb009770 |
0.3679 |
1.6706 |
Similar to Myosin, light polypeptide kinase,
telokin isoform |
R. norvegicus |
|
|
sw01324 |
Bmb019960 |
0.3645 |
0.6108 |
Putative dodecenoylCoA deltaisomerase |
A. gambiae |
|
|
sw08015 |
Bmb008533 |
0.3639 |
0 |
RE70136p |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw04656 |
Bmb041509 |
0.3487 |
0 |
Myb-MuvB complex subunit Lin-52 |
B. mori |
|
|
sw04354 |
Bmb032271 |
0.3440 |
1.0739 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw22659 |
Bmb026637 |
0.3341 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw07613 |
Bmb003176 |
0.3299 |
1.6706 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw17736 |
Bmb020390 |
0.3181 |
0 |
Clb2p: G2/Mitotic-specific cyclin 2 (Swiss Prot.
accession number P24869) |
S. cerevisiae |
|
|
sw15548 |
Bmb033549 |
0.3102 |
0 |
Similar to 1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate
O-acyltransferase 1 |
S. purpuratus |
|
|
sw12787 |
Bmb014393 |
0.3099 |
0 |
Similar to proteasome (prosome, macropain)
activator subunit 4 |
S. purpuratus |
|
|
sw14567 |
Bmb026253 |
0.2982 |
0 |
Myb-MuvB complex subunit Lin-52 |
B. mori |
|
|
sw14802 |
Bmb027878 |
0.2926 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw09365 |
Bmb028558 |
0.2860 |
0 |
H3/o protein |
H. sapiens |
|
|
sw15056 |
Bmb029785 |
0.2831 |
0 |
ARPP-21 protein |
H. sapiens |
|
|
sw09089 |
Bmb024185 |
0.2817 |
0 |
Similar to lipase, member I |
M. musculus |
|
|
sw00969 |
Bmb014154 |
0.2785 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw20134 |
Bmb036012 |
0.2652 |
0 |
GBB1_HOMAM Guanine nucleotide-binding protein
G(I)/G(S)/G(T) beta subunit 1 |
H. americanus |
|
|
sw11837 |
Bmb008373 |
0.2459 |
1.0739 |
CG5953-PB, isoform B |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw20970 |
Bmb015873 |
0.2400 |
0 |
ARM_MUSDO Armadillo segment polarity protein
armadillo protein |
B. mori |
|
|
sw18806 |
Bmb039008 |
0.2253 |
0 |
ENSANGP00000020978 |
A. gambiae |
|
|
sw08314 |
Bmb012904 |
0.2173 |
0 |
RE74861p |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw22291 |
Bmb028604 |
0.2146 |
0 |
arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase |
P. americana |
|
|
sw19170 |
swu07281 |
0.1898 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw19840 |
Bmb024593 |
0.1845 |
0 |
CG5621-PA |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw12540 |
Bmb012821 |
0.1818 |
0 |
Wdr22 protein |
M. musculus |
|
|
sw15828 |
Bmb035727 |
0.1811 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw01081 |
Bmb015839 |
0.1805 |
0 |
RE67575p |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw00132 |
Bmb001949 |
0.1738 |
0 |
ALdehyde deHydrogenase family member (alh-9) |
C. elegans |
|
|
sw01581 |
Bmb024372 |
0.1645 |
0 |
Cytochrome P450 |
B. mori |
|
|
sw11055 |
Bmb003256 |
0.1509 |
0 |
Cellular repressor of E1A-stimulated genes |
H. sapiens |
|
|
sw06613 |
Bmb030914 |
0.1462 |
0 |
RE22242p |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw14730 |
Bmb027341 |
0.1267 |
0 |
Unknown |
unknown |
|
|
sw12154 |
Bmb010503 |
0.1062 |
0 |
Similar to A disintegrin and metalloproteinase
with thrombospondin motifs like |
A. mellifera |
|
|
sw09321 |
Bmb027794 |
0.0876 |
0 |
Alpha trypsin |
D. erecta |
|
|
sw22208 |
Bmb020773 |
0.0866 |
0 |
Similar to integrase, catalytic domain
containing protein family member (2N547) |
S. purpuratus |
|
|
sw01593 |
Bmb024458 |
0.0835 |
0 |
Origin recognition complex subunit 4 |
D. melanogaster |
|
|
sw07448 |
Bmb000676 |
0.0827 |
0 |
ORF61 protein |
M. musculus |
|
|
sw04017 |
Bmb024762 |
0.0658 |
0 |
General odorant binding protein 1 |
B. mori |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2.
Gene categories of differentially expressed genes at 48 h
post oviposition.
|
Gene category |
Number of genes |
Percent (%) |
|
Molecular function |
|
|
|
Catalytic activity |
22 |
20.95 |
|
Binding |
17 |
16.19 |
|
Transporter activity |
5 |
4.76 |
|
Molecular transducer activity |
2 |
1.90 |
|
Enzyme regulator activity |
2 |
1.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
Biological process |
|
|
|
Cellular process |
22 |
13.78 |
|
Physiological process |
20 |
12.53 |
|
Metabolism |
13 |
8.14 |
|
Localization |
6 |
3.76 |
|
Establishment of localization |
6 |
3.76 |
|
Biological regulation |
4 |
2.51 |
|
Regulation of biological process |
3 |
1.88 |
|
Cellular component |
10 |
5.67 |
Table 3.
Significant KEGG pathways at 24 h post oviposition.
|
KEGG Pathway |
P-value |
Number of genes |
|
Glycosaminoglycan degradation |
0.001166 |
1 |
|
Phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan
biosynthesis |
0.001166 |
1 |
|
Pentose and glucuronate interconversions |
0.001632 |
1 |
|
Homologous recombination |
0.001632 |
1 |
|
Drug metabolism - other enzymes |
0.002098 |
1 |
|
Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism |
0.002564 |
1 |
|
Starch and sucrose metabolism |
0.003729 |
1 |
|
Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis |
0.004892 |
1 |
|
Pyrimidine metabolism |
0.007447 |
1 |
|
Metabolism |
0.092528 |
1 |
|
Total |
|
10 |
Analysis of differentially expressed gene pathway
The differentially expressed genes at 24 and 48 h post
oviposition were analyzed by CapitalBio MAS software for
a pathway-based analysis to identify known pathways such as
those in the KEGG (http://www.genome.jp/kegg), Biocarta
(http://www.biocarta.com), and GenMAPP. A total of nine
differentially expressed genes at 24 h post oviposition
based on the KEGG database analysis were involved in nine
pathways with a P-value cutoff of less than 0.05, including
glycosaminoglycan degradation, phenylalanine, tyrosine and
tryptophan biosynthesis, pentose and glucuronate
interconversions, homologous
recombination, drug metabolism-other enzymes, por-phyrin and
chlorophyll metabolism, starch and sucrose metabolism, and
aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, except metabolism pathway with
the p value 0.092528 (Table 3).
Compared with differentially expressed genes at 24 h post
oviposition, more than 26 differentially expressed genes
were involved in 24 significant pathways with a P-value less
than 0.05 at 48 h post oviposition.
These pathways include metabolism, synthesis and degradation
of ketone bodies, benzoate degradation via CoA ligation,
pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis, drug metabolism-other
enzymes, TGF-beta signaling pathway, galactose metabolism,
inositol phosphate metabolism, starch and sucrose
metabolism, fructose and mannose metabolism, amino-sugars
metabolism, beta-alanine metabolism, propanoate
metabolism, fatty acid metabolism, lysine degradation,
phosphatidylinositol signaling system, tryptophan
metabolism, butanoate metabolism, valine, leucine and
isoleucine degradation, VEGF signaling
pathway, pyrimidine metabolism,
pyruvate metabolism, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, and Wnt
signaling pathway (Table 4).
Table 4.
Significant KEGG pathways at 48 h post oviposition.
|
KEGG pathway |
P-value |
Number of genes |
|
Metabolism |
0.0001320 |
3 |
|
Synthesis and degradation of ketone bodies |
0.0011664 |
1 |
|
Benzoate degradation via CoA ligation |
0.0017492 |
1 |
|
Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis |
0.0017492 |
1 |
|
Drug metabolism - other enzymes |
0.0026229 |
1 |
|
TGF-beta signaling pathway |
0.0034960 |
1 |
|
Galactose metabolism |
0.0034960 |
1 |
|
Inositol phosphate metabolism |
0.0037869 |
1 |
|
Starch and sucrose metabolism |
0.0046592 |
1 |
|
Fructose and mannose metabolism |
0.0052404 |
1 |
|
Aminosugars metabolism |
0.0055309 |
1 |
|
beta-Alanine metabolism |
0.0055309 |
1 |
|
Propanoate metabolism |
0.0058213 |
1 |
|
Fatty acid metabolism |
0.0061117 |
1 |
|
Lysine degradation |
0.0061117 |
1 |
|
Phosphatidylinositol signaling system |
0.0061117 |
1 |
|
Tryptophan metabolism |
0.0066922 |
1 |
|
Butanoate metabolism |
0.0072724 |
1 |
|
Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation |
0.0078524 |
1 |
|
VEGF signaling pathway |
0.0087218 |
1 |
|
Pyrimidine metabolism |
0.0093011 |
1 |
|
Pyruvate metabolism |
0.0095907 |
1 |
|
Glycolysis / Gluconeogenesis |
0.0098801 |
1 |
|
Wnt signaling pathway |
0.0113265 |
1 |
|
Total |
|
26 |
Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
(RT-PCR) validation of differentially expressed genes
We confirmed the gene expression level collected from
microarray based on quantitative RT-PCR; 15 genes were
selected randomly as test genes, while Bm Actin B was
selected as the control to perform quantitative RT-PCR to
validate the gene expression level. The results indicate
that the change tendency of the expression levels of the 15
genes (normalized to Bm Actin B) had similar patterns
with the changes measured by the microarray analysis at 24 h
time point. The coefficient of determination was 0.7575
between the two sets of data (Figure 4).
|
|
|
|
Discussion |
|
|
|
The white egg mutants have important biological properties
in silkworm with potential application and eco-nomic value
in sericulture, such as sex-limited application in
sericulture, and screening marker in transgenic silkworm
study (Klemenz et al., 1987; Loukeris et al., 1995; Zwiebel
et al., 1995). White egg 2 mutant characterized by its white
eggs and white eyes during its life cycle, is more
convenient and easily used as biomarker for transgenesis
screening and gene functional study. In this study, to
investigate the differentially expressed genes between white
egg 2 mutant and normal black egg strain, near-isogenic line
of white egg 2 was constructed with the black egg
sex-limited variety Suluanban as white egg 2 gene (w-2)
donor, and the normal black egg variety Jingsong A as
recurrent parent. Eight generations proceeded by the
selection procedure of the white egg as selecting phenotype.
After eight generations, the re-current parent recovery is
assumed to be about 99.95%, retaining all normal black egg
traits, while the donor parent genome is reduced to less
than 0.05%, eliminating all the undesirable traits except
the white egg 2 related genes (Ashwath et al.,
2010). Theoretically, the near- isogenic line of white egg 2
mutant construction paves a high-efficiency way to
investigate the differentially expressed genes between white
egg 2 mutant and normal black egg strain joint with
microarray analysis.
The morphogenesis of the silkworm egg, which has three
distinct phases: spheric, ellipsoidal, and plattened-ellipsoid,
is an important procedure for its reproduction by strict
transmission of genetic information and energy stores to the
next generation (Tazima, 1964). As known, the color of the
eggs of silkworms depends on three factors: yolk color,
shell color, and the color of the serosa. The yolk and shell
color of eggs are derived from the silkworm’s blood; the
pigments passing from the haemolymph of the mother’s body
into the eggs. However, serosa color is produced by granules
which are formed in the serosa cells themselves (Tirelli,
1946). Normally, the color observed apparently concerns
mainly the serosa pigment, than that of the yolk or/and
shell. It is a fact that the serosa cell pigmentation may
therefore be considered as the result of an enzymatic
process involved in genes related to pigmentation.
Furthermore, when eggs are newly laid, all silkworm eggs
appear yellow, taking their color only from the yolk and
shell, since the serosa pigment has not yet developed. As
the serosa develops, granules of melanic pigment appear in
its cells, yellowish at first, following pink, red, dark red
and eventually dark brown. Notably,
this dark brown serosa pigment, as modified by the pigment
of the translucent shell, is what gives the normal egg its
gray color. The time course of this procedure is basically
around 24 h post oviposition (Kikkawa, 1941), so our
hypothetical genes related white egg 2 phenotype may have
been expressed before pigmentogenesis was complete in the
serosa at 24 h post oviposition. In this study, we found
that 157 genes were expressed differentially, including 80
up-regulated genes and 77 down-regulated genes at 24 h post
oviposition, and 178 genes including 98 up-regulated genes
and 80 down-regulated genes at 48 h post oviposition.
The GO functional categories for these genes exhibited
significant differences at both time points. It was noted
that a gene encoding high affinity nuclear juvenile hormone
binding protein was expressed over notable 33-fold change at
24 h post oviposition, inferring that this gene was involved
in juvenile hormone signal trans-duction in the
morphogenesis of the silkworm egg. Juvenile hormone exerts
pleiotropic functions during insect life cycles and it
primes the ecdysteroid response of developing follicles (Hartfelder,
2000). The fat body of pre-diapausing, early diapausing and
mid-diapausing larvae was found to release a high affinity
juvenile hormone binding protein in the southwestern corn
borer, Diatraea grandiosella (Dillwith et al., 1985).
We know that the diapause hormone, which is secreted from
the suboesophageal ganglion is mainly responsible for the
induction of diapause eggs, acts to control the metabolism
of 3-hydroxykynurenine and carbohydrate in silkworm pupae.
This hormone accelerates the 3-hydro-xykynurenine and
glycogen accumulation in pupae ovaries of silkworm
(Yamashita et al., 1966). In silkworm, the interaction of
diapause hormone and juvenile hormone regulate the diapause
event, although we hope to sequentially trace the upstream
or downstream genes of this high affinity nuclear juvenile
hormone binding protein in further study.
Tryptophan metabolites are the source of pigment produced
by granules accumulated in serosa of the eggs (Bernt Linzen,
1974). Bonse (1969) reported that one mutant of
Drosophila was unable to accumulate tryptophan in the
Malpighian tubules leading to its white color. In our study,
the transcript level of gene charged for phenylalanine,
tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis detected 1.27-fold
change. Down-regulation shows that the low tryptophan
content at early embryo development stage probably was
assumed to be insufficient, so that pigments in serosa led
to the color deficiency phenotype of the eggs observed as
the white egg. At 48 h post oviposition, one gene encoding
reverse transcriptase involved in tryptophan metabolism was
3.2173 fold up-regulated. We therefore inferred that the
source of pigment production was from tryptophan metabolites
at very early stage after oviposition.
The results of KEGG analysis indicate that the pathways
involved in differentially expressed genes were quite
different at 24 h post oviposition and at 48 h post
oviposition; only two common pathways; starch and sucrose
metabolism and pyrimidine metabolism existed at both time
points. The genes involved in starch and sucrose metabolism
were both up-regulated at two time points. We conjectured
that the genes involved in starch and sucrose metabolism
were over expressed to fill the needs of the embryo
development at non-diapause phase or merely survived at
diapause phase. Embryogenesis is an extremely
energy-intensive activity, requiring the rapid mobilization
of energy source at the early embryo development stages. On
the contrary, the gene involved in pyrimidine metabolism at
24 h post oviposition was up-regulated, while the one at 48
h was down-regulated. Pyrimidine nucleotides play a critical
role in cellular metabolism serving as activated precursors
of RNA and DNA (Evans and Guy, 2004). A gene involved in
pyrimidine metabolism was up-regulated leading to more
synthesized nucleic acids to meet the need of cell
proliferation from newly laid to 24 h. However, at 48 h post
oviposition, the eggs used in this experiment were in
diapause stage and as the process of cellular morpho-genesis
was almost completed, the gene expression level dropped down
correspondingly.
In order to demonstrate the accuracy of the microarray
analysis results, we confirmed the differential expression
of several randomly selected genes via RT-PCR validation, as
is shown in Figure 4. The
coefficient of determination
was 0.7575 and the result of microarray analysis was
reasonably consistent with those of the RT-PCR analysis. The
microarray analysis is based on the hybridization
technology; actually there is no strict linear relationship
between signal strength and transcript abundance for
different genes (Luo et al., 2005). In some cases, the
cross-hybridization among the homologous sequences may cause
the variance. Therefore, we conclude that our results are
reliable, and can be used for further research of the white
egg 2 mutant.
In summary, we report herein
genes differentially expressed in white egg 2 mutant
at 24 and 48 h after oviposition compared to normal
black egg strain, as detected by DNA microarray analysis.
The aim was to shed more light on any cues of genetic
information of white egg 2 mutant. Recent study (Tatematsu
et al., 2011) showed that in silkorm w-2 there exist
several multi-allelic mutations encoding the ortholog of
Drosophila scarlet, which is responsible for the
formation of a white/scarlet heterodimer and involved in the
transport of ommo-chrome precursors. In our laboratory, we
also found other new allelic mutation (data not shown).
Hence, results in this study provide new clues for the
exploration of the molecular mechanism of white egg 2
mutant. Further-more, in subsequent studies, close attention
will be focused on those genes with unknown function due to
the limitation of the silkworm database.
Acknowledgements
This project was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (Grant no. 30871829). We thank Prof. Xia
Qingyou (Southwest University) for the thoughtful advice and
Prof. Miao Yungen (Zhejiang University) for the critical
reading of the manuscript. We also thank Prof. Shen Xingjia
and Prof. Xu Anying (Sericultural Research Institute, CAAS)
for the materials supported.
|
|
|
|
References |
|
|
|
Arbeitman MN, Furlong EE, Imam F, Johnson E, Null BH,
Baker BS, Krasnow MA, Scott MP, Davis RW, White KP
(2002). Gene expression during the life cycle of
Drosophila melanogaster. Science, 297:
2270-2275.
Ashwath SK, Sreekumar S, Toms JT, Dandin SB, Kamble
CK (2010). Identification of RAPD markers linked to
digestive amylase genes using near isogenic lines of
the silkworm, Bombyx mori. J. Insect Sci. 10:
p. 84.
Baglioni C (1959). Genetic control of tryptophan
peroxidaseoxidase in Drosophila melanogaster.
Nature 184 (Suppl. 14): 1084-1085.
Bernt Linzen (1974). The tryptophan to ommochrome
pathway in insects.
Adv. Insect Physiol. 10: 117-246.
Bonse A (1969). Uber das auftreten von pterinen,
tryptophan und dessen derivate in verschiedene
organen der mutante white von Drosophila
melanogaster. Z. Naturf 24b:128-131.
DeRisi JL, Iyer VR, Brown PO (1997). Exploring the
metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on
a genomic scale. Science, 278: 680-686.
Dillwith JW, Mane SD, Chippendale GM (1985). High
affinity juvenile hormone binding protein of the
haemolymph of the southwestern corn borer,
Diatraea grandiosella: Characteristics and
relation to diapause.
Insect Biochem. 15: 233-246.
Egelhaaf A (1963a). Uber das wirkungsmuster des
a-locus von ephestia kukniella Z. Vererblehre 94:
348-384.
Evans DR, Guy HI (2004).
Mammalian pyrimidine biosynthesis: fresh insights
into an ancient pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 279:
33035-33038.
Glassman E (1956). Kynurenine
formamidase in mutants of Drosophila. Genet. 41:
566-574.
Guo Y, Guo H, Zhang L, Xie H, Zhao X, Wang F, Li Z,
Wang Y, Ma S, Tao J, Wang W, Zhou Y, Yang W, Cheng J
(2005). Genomic Analysis of Anti-Hepatitis B Virus (HBV)
Activity by small interfering RNA and lamivudine in
stable HBV-producing cells. J. Virol. 79:
14392-14403.
Hartfelder K (2000). Insect juvenile hormone: from
"status quo" to high society. Braz. J. Med. Biol.
Res. 33: 157-177.
Hong SM, Nho SK, Kim NS, Lee JS, Kang SW (2006).
Gene expression profiling in the silkworm, Bombyx
mori, during early embryonic development. Zoolog.
Sci. 23: 517-528.
Inagami K (1958). The mechanism of formation of
tryptophon pigments and the metablism of tryptophon
in silkworm. Bull Kumamoto Sericult. Exp. Stat. 6:
57-58
Jiang M, Ryu J, Kiraly M, Duke
K, Reinke V, Kim SK (2001).
Genome-wide analysis of developmental and
sex-regulated gene expression profiles in
Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 98: 218-223.
Kikkawa H (1941). Mechanism of pigment formation in
Bombyx and Drosophila. Genetic, 28: 587-607.
Klemenz R, Weber U, Gehring WJ
(1987).
The white gene as a marker in a new P-element vector
for gene transfer in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res.
15: 3947–3959.
Komoto N, Quan GX, Sezutsu H, Tamura T (2009). A
single-base deletion in an ABC transporter gene
causes white eyes, white eggs, and translucent
larval skin in the silkworm w-3 (oe) mutant. Insect
Biochem. Mol. Biol. 39: 152-156.
Leibenguth F (1967). Regulation of tryptophan
metabolism in the parasitic wasp, Habrobracon
juglandis. Experientia, 23: 1069-1071.
Liu WM, Laux H, Henry JY, Bolton TB, Dalgleish AG,
Galustian C (2009). A microarray study of altered
gene expression in colorectal cancer cells after
treatment with immunomodulatory drugs: differences
in action in vivo and in vitro. Mol.
Biol. Rep. 37: 1801–1814.
Loukeris TG, Livadaras I, Arca B, Zabalou S, Savakis
C (1995). Gene transfer into the medfly,
Ceratitis capitata, with a Drosophila hydei
transposable element. Science, 270: 2002–2005.
Lu HS (1991). The sericultural science in China.
Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers. First
ver. p. 224.
Luo M, Liang XQ, Dang P, Holbrook CC, Bausher MG,
Lee RD, Guo BZ (2005). Microarray-based screening of
differentially expressed genes in peanut in response
to Aspergillus parasiticus infection and
drought stress. Plant Sci. 169: 695-703.
Luo Y, Lv GL, Wu WT, Chen SN, Cheng ZQ (2010).
Analysis of genome expression in the response of
Oryza granulata to Xanthomonas oryzae pv
oryzae. Mol. Biol. Rep. 37: 875–892.
Ma L, Chen C, Liu X, Jiao Y, Su N, Li L, Wang X, Cao
M, Sun N, Zhang X, Bao J, Li J, Pedersen S, Bolund
L, Zhao H, Yuan L, Wong GK, Wang J, Deng XW, Wang J
(2005). A microarray analysis of the rice
transcriptome and its comparison to Arabidopsis.
Genome, Res. 15: 1274-1283.
Mayer G, Ullrich V, Schmeling U, Staudinger H
(1968). Possible involvement of cytochrome b5 in L-kynurenine
3-hydroxylase. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol. Chem. 349:
p. 1616.
Patterson TA, Lobenhofer EK, Fulmer-Smentek SB,
Collins PJ, Chu TM, Bao W, Fang H, Kawasaki ES,
Hager J, Tikhonova IR, Walker SJ, Zhang L, Hurban P,
Longueville FD, Fuscoe JC, Tong W, Shi L, Wolfinger
RD (2006). Performance comparison of one-color and
two-color platforms within the MicroArray Quality
Control (MAQC) project. Nat. Biotechnol. 24:
1140-1150.
Pinamonti S, Petris A, Miliani M (1970). Studies on
the kynurenine transaminase of Schistocerca
gregaria forsk. (Orthoptera, Acrididae). Comp.
Biochem. Physiol. 37: 311-320.
Quan GX, Kim I, Komoto N, Sezutsu H, Ote M, Shimada
T, Kanda T, Mita K, Kobayashi M, Tamura T (2002).
Characterization of the kynurenine 3-monooxygenase
gene corresponding to the white egg 1 mutant in the
silkworm Bombyx mori. Mol. Genet. Genomics
267: 1-9.
Son CG, Bilke S, Greer BT, Wei JS, Whiteford CC,
Chen QR, Cenacchi N, Khan J (2005). Database of mRNA
gene expression profiles of multiple human organs.
Genome Res. 15: 443-450.
Tatematsu K, Yamamoto K, Uchino K, Narukawa J,
Lizuka T, Katsuma S, Shimada T, Tamura T, Sezutsu H,
Daimon T (2011). Positional cloning of silkworm
white egg 2 (w-2) locus shows functional
conservation and diversification of ABC transporters
for pigmentation in insect. Genes Cells 16(4):
331-342.
Tazima Y (1964). The Genetics of the Silkworm.
London: Academic Press.
Tirelli M (1946). Egg and eye color in mutant
silkworms; pigment mutations of Bombyx mori
L. and related biochemical and genetic factors. J.
Heredit. 37: 377-383.
Tusher V, Tibshirani R, Chu G (2001).
Significance analysis of microarrays applied to
transcriptional responses to ionizing radiation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98: 5116-5121.
Walker JR, Su AI, Self DW, Hogenesch JB, Lapp H,
Maier R, Hoyer D, Bilbe G (2004). Applications of a
rat multiple tissue gene expression data set. Genome
Res. 14: 742-749.
Wu P, Wang X, Qin GX, Liu T, Jiang YF, Li MW, Guo XJ
(2011). Microarray analysis of the gene expression
profile in the midgut of silkworm infected with
cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus. Mol. Biol. Rep. 38:
333-341.
Xia Q, Cheng D, Duan J, Wang G, Cheng T, Zha X, Liu
C, Zhao P, Dai F, Zhang Z, He N, Zhang L, Xiang Z
(2007). Microarray-based gene expression profiles in
multiple tissues of the domesticated silkworm,
Bombyx mori. Genome Biol. 8: R162.
Yamashita O, Hasegawa K (1966). Further studies on
the mode of action of the diapause hormone in the
silkworm, Bombyx mori. J. Insect Physiol. 12:
957-962.
Young ND, Tanksley SD (1989). RFLP analysis of the
size of chromosomal segments retained around the
Tm-2 locus of tomato during backcross breeding.
Theor. Appl. Genet. 77: 353-359.
Zwiebel LJ, Saccone G, Zacharopoulou A, Besansky NJ,
Favia G,Collins FH, Louis C, Kafatos FC (1995). The
white gene of Ceratitis capitata: a phenotypic
marker for germline transformation. Science, 270:
2005-2008.
|
|