| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full Length
Research
|
|
Effect of
sulfur and iron fertilizers on yield, yield components and
nutrient uptake in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) under water
stress
Mostafa Heidari*, Mohammad
Galavi and Maryam Hassani
Department of Agronomy Plant Breeding, University of Zabol,
Zabol, Iran.
*Corresponding author. E-mail:Haydari2005@gmail.com. Tel:
+98- 9155710972. Fax: +98(0)542-2226762
Accepted 13 June, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
|
To evaluate the effects of sulfur and iron fertilizers on
yield, yield components and nutrient uptake in sesame (Sesamum
indicum L.) under water stress, a field experiment was
conducted as split factorial design with three replication
at Dezful, Khuzestan, Iran. Two irrigation regimes were used
(well-watered and water-limited) as the main plots and
subplot consisted of three levels of sulfur (B1 =
0, B2 = 100 and B3 = 200 kg.ha-1)
and three foliar application of iron (C1 = 0, C2
= 3 and C3 = 6*1000 concentrations). The
results showed that water stress significantly reduced
biological yield (10.26%) and number of capsule per plant.
Interaction between water stress and combination of iron and
sulfur fertilizers had significant effect on grain yield.
The highest grain yield was obtained by well water treatment
and b2c2 fertilizers treatment.
Interaction between water stress and combination of iron and
sulfur fertilizers had significant effect on nitrogen and
iron content in the seeds. The highest iron content of seeds
was obtained at water stress treatment and b1c2,
and highest nitrogen content was at b1c2
and b1c3 fertilizers treatments.
Key words:
Sesame, water stress, sulfur, iron, yield, nutrients
content. |
|
|
|
Introduction |
|
|
|
Drought is known to limit plant productivity in many regions
of the world. Recent studies showed that growth rates of
several plants were directly proportional to the
availability of water in the soil (Kamel and Loser, 1995).
Water deficit is also known to alter a variety of
biochemical and physiological processes ranging from
photosynthesis to protein synthesis and solute accumulation
(Hu and Schmidhalter, 1998). The extent to which
photosynthetic capability is maintained during periods of
water stress and the ability of rapid recovery of
photosynthesis after rewatering may play an important role
in plant adaptation to drought environments.
Crop production in arid and semi-arid regions is restricted
by soil deficiencies in moisture and plant nutrients.
Consequently, adequate levels of irrigation and fertilizers
are needed (El-siddig, 1998). High yielding crops need large
and regular supply of macro and micro nutrient elements to
develop high photosynthetic capacity
and maintain the proper elements concentration in the leaves
(Lawlor, 1995). The importance of sulfur fertilezation in
increasing wheat production and other crops has been well
documented, but still it is difficult to determine the
quantities to apply under water stress conditions. Sulfur
(S) is one of the essential macro elements of plant and is
regarded as the fourth key element after N, P and K (Lewandowska
and Sirko, 2008).
The effect of micronutrient elements on yield and crop
performance has been reported by many investigators. Rehm
and Albert (2006) reported that yields were higher for the
treatments with micronutrients. In this respect, Singh
(2004) reported that foliar sprays of ferrous sulphate were
found to be more effective in wheat. Nevertheless, the soil
and foliar application of Mn significantly increased the
yields, but the rate of soil application of Mn (40 to 50 kg
ha-1) is uneconomical than its foliar sprays due
to more reversion of soil applied Mn with higher oxide in
alkaline soils.
Sesame is considered a drought resistance crop and its
cultivation is extended beyond the tropical and sub-tropical
zones to temperate and subtemperate zones of the world
(Ail et al., 2000). The irrigation water regimes affect
growth, yield and oil content of sesame plants. In this
connection, Hong et al. (1985) indicated that drought stress
during vegetative growth reduced seed yield of sesame from
8.5 to 4.3 tha-1 and that the main factor in
yield reduction was plant height.
Iran
is
a country
with
semi-arid
climate.
In most areas, water stress reduces the growth and yield of
many crops. The
lack of nutrient
elements such as
iron and
sulfur reduce
plant growth.
The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of
iron and sulfur application on growth, yield, yield
components and nutrient uptake of sesame (Sesamum indicum
L.) plants grown under water stress conditions.
Table 1.
Some physical and chemical properties of the soil.
|
Soil property |
Value |
|
pH |
7.64 |
|
EC (ds/m) |
0.57 |
|
OC (%) |
0.62 |
|
P (ppm) |
5.6 |
|
K(ppm) |
121 |
|
Cu (ppm) |
0.9 |
|
Fe (ppm) |
1.6 |
|
Mn (ppm) |
4.6 |
|
Zn (ppm) |
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
Materials and Methods |
|
|
|
In
order to evaluate the effects of iron and sulfur application on
sesame under water stress, a field
experiment in split
factorial
on
the randomized complete block design with three replications was
conducted in 2009 to 2010 in Dezful, Khuzestan, Iran (32°22′ N,
48°32′ E; 82 m above sea level). The pH = 7.64, EC = 0.57 ds/m and
soil texture of the experimental site were sandy
loam. Some physical and chemical
properties of the soil are shown in Table 1. Each block consisted of
two main plots (for the two irrigation treatments). Two irrigation
regimes used were well-watered control (irrigation after 70% field
capacity of soil) and water-limited (irrigation after 50% field
capacity of soil) irrigation.
Subplot consisted of
three levels of sulfur (B1 = 0, B2 = 100 and B3
= 200 kg.ha-1) from ammonium sulfate application in
soil before sowing) and three foliar application of iron (C1
= 0, C2 = 3 and C3 = 6*1000
concentrations, application at the eight leaf stage). These two
treatments were applied as
factorial in the subplot. After Fe application, water-limited
treatment was
laid out. Gotvand cultivar
of
sesame
was used in this study.
In
the experiment, each subplot was 12 m2 (4 m width and 3 m
length) and consisted of six rows. Plots were fertilized with 150 kg
ha−1 nitrogen from urea and applied before sowing and
after eight leaf stage, 100 kg ha−1 phosphorus from super
phosphate was applied once before sowing.
At
harvest time, sesame plants were collected from each plots and the
following characters were determined:
plant height (cm), capsules per plant, weight of seed/plant (g),
seed and biological yields and harvest index (HI%).
Total
nitrogen content in grains was determined using the method described
by Kjeldahl method. Potassium was determined using Flame Photometer
according to the methods described by Chapman and Pratt (1961). Fe
was determined by using Konic Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer.
Statistical analysis
All data were analyzed using the SAS
Institute Inc. Version 6.12 Software. Initially, the data were
analyzed in an analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) test to determine
significance (P≤ 0.05) of the treatment effects.
The
data were analyzed according to
split
factorial
on
the randomized complete block and the differences between averages
were tested at 5% significance level in accordance with Duncan
multiple comparative method.
|
|
|
|
Results and Discussion |
|
|
|
Yield and yield components
Analysis of variance revealed a
significant effect of water
stress on biological yield,
number of capsule per plant and
harvest index in sesame (Table
2). However, water stress had no
significant effect on grain
yield, but reduced it (Table 3).
Water stress reduced 10.26%
biological yield as compared to
the control treatment.
Fredrick et al. (2001)
indicated that water deficit had
significant effect on yield of
lateral stems of soybean and its
yield under normal conditions
was higher than that under
stress conditions. In this study
however, water stress had no
significant effect on grain
yield in
sesame plants, but it had the most effect on
yield components, especially
biological yield and decreased
it to about 10.26% (Table 3).
Fredrick et al. (2001)
stated that water stress reduced
growth and biological yield of
soybean.
With iron and sulfur fertilizer,
only iron fertilizer had
significant effect on grain
yield (Table 2).
Among the
three levels
of iron
fertilizer, performance increase in yield
was
observed in C2 level
and increased it to about 22.14%
(Table 3).
Tekin et al. (2000)
conducted a field experiment to
determine the effect of soil and
foliar application of iron as
iron sulphate on the yield of
Pistachio nuts. Results revealed
that three foliar applications
of iron sulphate at 55 ppm was
the most effective and soil
application at 4 and 6 kg of
iron sulphate per tree was also
effective in enhancing nuts
weight. There was a positive
correlation between iron levels
and weight of 100-nuts.
Interaction between water stress
and combination of iron and
sulfur fertilizers had
significant effect on grain
yield in sesame plants (Table
2). The highest grain yield was
obtained at well
water
treatment and b2c2
combination of two fertilizers
(Figure 1).
Conry (1997) stated that S
application from the leaf had a
minimum effect on the grain
yield of barley. Sulphur based
fertilizers decrease the pH of
soil and increases the uptake of
other plant nutrients.
Therefore, the yield increases.
However, iron
fertilizer had no significant
effect on yield components in
sesame plant but
sulfur had significant effect on
biological yield and
number of capsule per plant and
increased them. Sulfur
fertilizer increased biological
yield by 12.91% and number of
capsule per plant by 10.62%.
This increase was only up to the
b2 for biological
yield (Table 3).
Withers et al. (1997)
reported that inorganic S
application increased straw
yield of cereals by 34%. Our
findings are in agreement with
the findings of other
researchers. The effect of
different sulfur applications
was statistically significant on
number of capsule per plant.
The lowest
number of capsule per
plant
was obtained from the control
plots, whereas the highest
values (10.62%) were obtained
from the plots given 200 kg/ha
sulfur (Table 3). The sulphur
application improved the soil
structure and it increased the
usefulness of other plant
nutrients. Dewal and Pareek
(2004) stated that the plant
height and the number of seed
per spike in wheat were obtained
with the application of 40 kg S
ha-1 application.
Interaction between water stress
and combination of iron and
sulfur
fertilizers had significant
effect on
biological yield and
number
of capsule per plant
(Table 2). The highest
biological yield was obtained at
well watered treatment, b2c1
and b3c3
(Figure 2) and
number
of
capsule per plant
at b3c3
combination of two fertilizers
(Figure 3). Salvagiotti and
Miralles (2008) showed that S
addition increased
biomass and grain yield in
wheat, showing a positive
interaction between N and S,
which was reflected in a greater
NUE (nitrogen use efficiency).ListenRead
phonetically
Table 2. Results of analysis of
variance (ANOVA) of water stress
(W), sulfur (B) and iron (C),
and their interaction with gain
yield, yield components and
nutrients content in sesame.
|
Independent variable |
Dependent variable |
|
Grain yield (g m-2) |
Biological yield (g
m-2) |
Number of capsule
per plant |
Number of seed per
capsule |
HI (%) |
Nitrogen (%) |
Potassium (mg/g DW) |
Iron (mg/kg DW) |
|
Block |
644.12 |
306714.24** |
891.46 |
0.907 |
432.16* |
0.0507* |
0.142 |
0.00000313 |
|
W |
347.57 |
266985.35** |
25654.24** |
0.296 |
96.801* |
0.0240 |
0.462* |
0.00048002* |
|
Errora
(Block*W) |
2934.68 |
55744.907 |
3500.12 |
0.0185 |
55.701 |
0.0497* |
0.0674 |
0.00000257 |
|
b |
3946.29 |
175233.85* |
6548.57* |
0.129 |
21.281 |
0.061* |
0.197* |
0.00069702** |
|
c |
29202.57** |
57346.074 |
2258.57 |
0.074 |
24.803 |
0.107** |
0.215* |
0.00012757* |
|
W*b |
301.40 |
12459.85 |
17742.12** |
0.351 |
12.261 |
0.1044** |
0.529** |
0.00002724 |
|
W*c |
2966.68 |
75788.74 |
11891.24** |
0.518 |
31.721 |
0.0124 |
0.624** |
0.00049091** |
|
b*c |
5015.12* |
112098.12* |
25473.407** |
0.601 |
52.742* |
0.0187 |
0.072 |
0.00024057** |
|
W*b*c |
5461.35* |
393991.57** |
10453.12** |
0.324 |
20.490 |
0.0372* |
0.074 |
0.00049263** |
|
Eb |
1842.15 |
33832.69 |
1841.54 |
0.317 |
18.260 |
0.01259 |
0.069 |
0.00004162 |
W = Irrigation; B = sulfur; C =
iron. * P<0.05; ** P<0.01.
Numbers represent F
values at 5% level; ns, not
significant.
Table 3.
Mean comparisons of the effect
of water stress and combination
of sulfur and iron fertilizers
on
gain yield, yield components and
nutrients content in sesame.
|
Parameter |
Grain yield (g m-2) |
Biological yield(g m-2) |
Number of capsule
per plant |
Number of seed per
capsule |
HI (%) |
Nitrogen
(%) |
Potassium
(mg/g DW) |
Iron (mg/kg DW) |
|
Irrigation |
|
Well Water |
293.41a |
1374.56a |
78.88889a |
360.93a |
22.093a |
3.53370a |
6.64074b |
0.0433333b |
|
Water stress |
288.33a |
1233.93b |
77.04074b |
317.33b |
24.770a |
3.57593a |
6.82593a |
0.0492963a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sulfur fertilizer |
|
B1 |
284.94a |
1234.06b |
320.56b |
78.7222a |
23.706a |
3.48778b |
6.65000b |
0.053500a |
|
B2 |
307.72a |
1417.06a |
338.17ab |
78.8889a |
24.356a |
3.59444a |
6.71111ab |
0.042778b |
|
B3 |
279.94a |
1261.61b |
358.67a |
78.8333a |
22.233a |
3.58222a |
6.83889a |
0.042667b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron fertilizer |
|
C1 |
262.33b |
1332.17a |
338.67a |
78.8889a |
22.500a |
3.49389b |
6.63333b |
0.044778b |
|
C2 |
336.94a |
1239.28a |
350.56a |
78.7778a |
24.750a |
3.52889b |
6.71667ab |
0.044778b |
|
C3 |
273.33b |
1341.28a |
328.17a |
78.7778a |
23.044a |
3.64167a |
6.85000a |
0.049389a |
Means with different letters are
significantly different at P<
0:05 (Duncan’s test).
W = Irrigation; B =
sulfur; C = iron; Sulfur (B1
= 0, B2 = 100
and B3 = 200 kg.ha-1);
Iron (C1 = 0, C2
= 3 and C3 =
6*1000 concentrations).
Nutrient contents in seeds
The results of this study
indicate that water stress
significantly (P<0.05)
affected potassium and iron
content of the seeds of sesame
(Table 2). Water stress
increased Fe and K+
content of seeds (Table 3).
Potassium increases the plant’s
drought resistance through its
functions in stomatal
regulation, osmoregulation,
energy status, charge balance,
protein synthesis and
homeostasis (Marschner, 1995).
It also maintains turgor
pressure and reduces
transpiration under drought
conditions (Andersen et al.,
1992). In plants coping with
drought stress, the accumulation
of K+ may be more
important than the production of
organic solutes during the
initial adjustment phase,
because osmotic adjustment
through ion uptake like K+
is more energy efficient (Hsiao,
1973).
Sulfur and iron fertilizers had
significant effect on potassium,
nitrogen and iron content in the
seeds of sesame plants (Table
2). Sulfur fertilizer increased
potassium and iron content but
increased nitrogen in b2
treatment (Table 3). The iron
foliar application increased the
amounts of these three elements
in the seeds (Table 3).
However, S addition in b2
in the soil showed N increment
in seeds of sesame, suggesting
that soil S may have been enough
to meet the crop N demand at
this N uptake level (Salvagiotti
and Miralles, 2008).
Environmental conditions during
the stem elongation period (from
terminal spikelet to anthesis in
wheat) may affect crop growth
and thus, modify the pattern of
N uptake (Hocking, 1994).
Interaction between water
stress and combination of
iron and sulfur fertilizers had
significant effect on nitrogen
and
iron concentration in seeds
(Table 2). The highest iron
content of seeds was obtained at
water stress treatment and b1c2
(Figure 4) and nitrogen
at b1c2
and b1c3
combination of the two
fertilizers treatments (Figure
5). Application of S containing
fertilizer can result to soil
acidification and may eventually
influence nutrient uptake (Havlin
et al., 2007).

|
|
|
|
Conclusion |
|
|
|
From the obtained results, it can be concluded that
the use of foliar spraying of iron and application
of sulfur can alleviate the harmful effect of water
stress on growth, yield components and nutrient
elements contents in the seeds of
sesame.
Interaction between sulfur and iron depends on
initial soil fertility status, levels of nutrients
applied, test crop and climatic conditions of the
region during crop growth period. The results in
this study indicated that water stress had
significant effect on biological yield and number of
capsule per plant and decreased them. However, the
highest grain yield was obtained by the well watered
treatment but at the water stress condition,
application of sulfur and iron (b2c2
treatment) was more effective on grain yield and
yield components, and
improved
grain yield under water
stress.

|
|
|
|
References |
|
|
|
Ali
A, Kafkafi U, Yamaguchi I, Sugimoto Y, Inanga S (2000). Growth
transpiration, root-boron? cytokinins and gibberllins and nutrient
compositional changes in sesame exposed to low root-zone temperature
under different ratios of nitrate:
Ammonium supply.
J.
Plant Nutr.
23:
123-140
Andersen MN, Jensen CR, Lösch R (1992). The interaction effects of
potassium and drought in field-grown barley. 1. Yield, water-use
efficiency and growth.
Acta. Agriculturae Scandinavica,
Section B -Soil
Plant Sci.
42: 34-44.
Chapman HO, Pratt PE (1961). Methods of Analysis for Soil, Plants
and Water.
University
of
California,
Division
of
Agric. p. 68
Conry
MJ (1997). The influence of different nitrogenous fertilizers and
foliar-applied sulphur on the yield, grain nitrogen and screenings
of spring malting barley. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy,
Section B, Biol. Environ. 97(2): 133-138.
Dewal
GS, Pareek RG (2004). Effect of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on
growth, yield and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum).
Indian J. Agron.
49(39): 160-162.
El-Siddig
K, Lüdders P, Ebert G, Adiku SGK (1998). Response of Rose Apple
(Eugenia jambos L.) to water and nitrogen supply.
J. Appl. Bot.,
72:
203-206.
Fredrick JR, Camp CR, Bauer PH (2001).
Drought-stress effects on branch and mainstem seed yield and yield
components of determinate soybean.
Crop Sci. 759-763.
Havlin JL, Beaton JD, Tisdale SL, Nelson WL (2007). Soil Fertility
and Fertilizers, An Introduction to Nutrient Management, 7th
edition, Pearson Education Inc. Singapore, p. 221.
Hocking PJ (1994) Dry-matter production, mineral nutrient
concentrations, and nutrient distribution and redistribution in
irrigated wheat.
J.
Plant Nutr.
17: 1289-1308.
Hong
Y, Yu JM, Chai KC (1985). Effect of drought stress on upland crops.
Research report of the Rural Development Administration Crop, Koera-Republic
(C.F. Computure Res). Intl. Agric. Cent. Inform. Serv. 27: 148-155.
Hsiao
TC (1973). Plant responses to water stress.
Ann.
Rev.
Plant Physiol.
24: 519-570.
Hu Y,
Schmidhalter U (1998). Spatial distributions of inorganic ions and
carbohydrates contributing to osmotic adjustment in the elongating
wheat leaf under saline conditions.
Aust. J. Plant Physiol.
25:
591-597.
Kamel
A, Loser DM (1995). Contribution of carbohydrates and other solutes
to osmotic adjustment in wheat leaves under water stress.
J.
Plant Physiol.
145: 363-366.
Lawlor DW (1995). The effects of water deficit on photosynthesis In:
Environment and plant metabolisim (Smirnoff ed.) Bios. Sci.
Publishers. pp. 129-160.
Lewandowska M, Sirko A (2008). Recent advances in understanding
plant response to sulfur-deficiency stress. Acta. Biochimica.
Polonica, 55: 457-471.
Marschner H (1995). Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic
Press, London.
Rehm
G, Albert S (2006). Micronutrients and Production of Hard Red Spring
Wheat. Minnesota Crope News . pp. 1-3.
Salvagiotti F, Miralles DJ (2008). Radiation interception, biomass
production and grain yield as affected by the interaction of
nitrogen and sulfur fertilization in wheat. Eur. J. Agron. 28(3):
282-290.
Singh
MV (2004). IFA International Symposium on Micronurients. 23-25
February 2004. Tekin H, Arpaci S, Yukceken Y, Cakiri I (2000)
Correction of lime chlorosis in Pristachio orchards. Bache, 29(1-3):
19-25.
Withers PJA, Zhao FJ, McGrath SP, Evans EJ, Sinclair AH (1997).
Sulphur inputs for optimum yields of cereals.
Aspects
Appl. Biol.
50: 191-198.
|
|