African Journal of Biotechnology

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

 

Afr. J. Biotechnol.


Vol. 6 No.22



Viewing options:


 • Abstract
 • Full text
 • Reprint (PDF) (1876K)

Search Pubmed for articles by:

 

Osemeahon SA

Maina HM

 


Other links:


PubMed Citation


Related articles in PubMed

 

African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 6 (22), pp. 2532-2540, 19 November 2007   

ISSN 1684–5315 © 2007 Academic Journals        

 

 

Full Length Research Paper

 

Development of amino resins for emulsion paint formulation: effect of aldelhydic group and degree of substitution

 

Osemeahon S.A.*, Barminas, J. T., Aliyu, B.A. and Maina H.M.

 

Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Technology, Yola, P. M. B.  2076 Yola, Nigeria.

 

*Corresponding author. E-mail: sundayosemeahon@yahoo.com

 

Accepted 5 November, 2007

 
    Abstract

 

 

 

In our continuous effort to develop a paint binder from amino resins, amino resins from different aldehydic groups were synthesized to produce urea, formaldehyde (UF), urea acetaldehyde (UA), urea proparaldehyde (UP) and urea butaldehyde (UB) at different degree of substitution (Mono – tetra). Some physical properties of these resins were evaluated. The viscosity, gel time, density and refractive index of the resins (except UB) were found to increase with increase in alkyl length of the aldehydic group while turbidity (except UF) increased with increase in alkyl length of the aldehydic group. On the other hand, melting point and moisture uptake decreases with increase in alkyl length of the aldehydic group. In the case of the degree of substitution the viscosity, turbidity, melting point and moisture uptake increases with increase in the degree of substitution while the gel time and refractive index were found to decrease with increase in the degree of substitution. However, an initial rise followed by a gradual fall was recorded for density for the different degree of substitution for all the resins. Samples for UF and UA with the exception of monoethylol urea were too hard brittle and has low water resistance while those of UP and UB resins were too soft and remained as semi solid in the cured state at room temperature (30oC). This result indicates that these resins cannot be used alone as paint binder. However, monoethylol urea seems to have sieved itself out as a compromise candidate who is neither brittle nor too soft. A comparison of monoethylol urea with some physical properties of some convectional paint binders present it as a potential binder which may be used in the coating industry.

 

Key words: Paint binder, aldehydic group, degree of substitution, amino resin.

 

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Copyright © 2007 by Academic Journals.